Olly wrote:No cable based new is worth watching. Local access news is the best way to find out a more truthful non political story.
Usually I will see a story on the national news then track it back to the journalist that first reported it locally. That way I don't read any of the major media's bias spin on it. Fox and MSNBC are the worst as the bias spin to either the right or left.
I tend to take a bit of a different tact.
If I can find where the New York Times or some other left leaning news source includes something in their story that is unfavorable to the leftist or Democrat world view, I tend to believe it. Same for something unfavorable to the establishment Republicans, etc. Find a news source that would really rather not say it and you have more confidence that they did their due diligence and were forced to say it just to try and maintain the pretense of serious honest journalism.
Clear open bias is a good thing. I'd rather have one open lefty and one open righty reporting their own versions of the news than to have people lying, probably to themselves, about pretending to be neutral. You pretty much have to be brain dead to be neutral.
Fair and balanced does not mean unbiased. However, I can't stand any of them because I think they are all not very bright. In the morning, I usually get on the bike at the gym for 45 minutes. I flip between CNN, MSNBC, FNC, and occasionally a local news cast and if everything else is in commercials the Today show. While they all annoy me, getting all the different spins is probably the best you can really hope for and then follow up online if it is something that really interests me.
For example, what did Jeb do with his emails. I found a story on CNN. What did Hillary do, I'm going to the NYT and similar outlets.