Duck Hunting Forum, Goose Hunting Forum, Waterfowl Hunting, Duck Boats.
https://www.waterfowlforum.net/
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 2:06 pmOlly wrote:The Duck Hammer wrote:How close to that does it get on gas mileage?
Its got the V6 in it and I get around 16-18 mpg and maybe close to 20 when I stay below 65 on the highway.
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 2:08 pmThe Duck Hammer wrote:Olly wrote:The Duck Hammer wrote:How close to that does it get on gas mileage?
Its got the V6 in it and I get around 16-18 mpg and maybe close to 20 when I stay below 65 on the highway.
I see. Looked into rangers when I was looking for my truck. Would have much rather had a V6 but the inline 5 is doing great, pulls a lot better than I expected.
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 2:10 pmPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 2:18 pmPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 4:19 pmaunt betty wrote:Had a Toyota with the 2200 cc 4-cylinder.
Was a 4x4. Fun as hell but under powered.
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 4:21 pmEric Haynes wrote:aunt betty wrote:Had a Toyota with the 2200 cc 4-cylinder.
Was a 4x4. Fun as hell but under powered.
What year was the Toyota? I'm surprised you got rid of the 1886 for a Toyota unless it was an early 1900's model.
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 4:51 pmaunt betty wrote:Eric Haynes wrote:aunt betty wrote:Had a Toyota with the 2200 cc 4-cylinder.
Was a 4x4. Fun as hell but under powered.
What year was the Toyota? I'm surprised you got rid of the 1886 for a Toyota unless it was an early 1900's model.
1980. Drove it til the bed rusted off. Built a wood bed, kept on going until around 2000-ish.
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 5:40 pmPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 5:45 pmEric Haynes wrote:aunt betty wrote:Eric Haynes wrote:aunt betty wrote:Had a Toyota with the 2200 cc 4-cylinder.
Was a 4x4. Fun as hell but under powered.
What year was the Toyota? I'm surprised you got rid of the 1886 for a Toyota unless it was an early 1900's model.
1980. Drove it til the bed rusted off. Built a wood bed, kept on going until around 2000-ish.
What did you do with the 1886? must have been worth some money.
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 5:52 pmEric Haynes wrote:aunt betty wrote:Eric Haynes wrote:aunt betty wrote:Had a Toyota with the 2200 cc 4-cylinder.
Was a 4x4. Fun as hell but under powered.
What year was the Toyota? I'm surprised you got rid of the 1886 for a Toyota unless it was an early 1900's model.
1980. Drove it til the bed rusted off. Built a wood bed, kept on going until around 2000-ish.
What did you do with the 1886? must have been worth some money.
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 5:52 pmjust like I remember itgila-river wrote:
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 5:57 pmaunt betty wrote:Had a 1878 ranger with a straight six. Full sized truck...ranger. yeah.
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 6:02 pmPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 6:04 pmEric Haynes wrote:aunt betty wrote:Had a 1878 ranger with a straight six. Full sized truck...ranger. yeah.
My bad, it was 1878
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 6:17 pmaunt betty wrote:Eric Haynes wrote:aunt betty wrote:Had a 1878 ranger with a straight six. Full sized truck...ranger. yeah.
My bad, it was 1878
Yeah...they had pickups before cars. The 1778 model was slave driven. You should know.
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 6:26 pmFlintRiverFowler wrote:
Out for an evening ride on the golf course.
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 6:37 pmGadwallGetter530 wrote:FlintRiverFowler wrote:
Out for an evening ride on the golf course.
Big hitter, the Dali Lama.
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 6:43 pmFlintRiverFowler wrote:GadwallGetter530 wrote:FlintRiverFowler wrote:
Out for an evening ride on the golf course.
Big hitter, the Dali Lama.
More like tweedle dee, and boss ass bitch.
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 8:36 pmPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 8:39 pmPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:18 pm3legged_lab wrote:
Funny story on this fireplace. The framer didnt take into account the thickness of the hearth stones when framing. I had to come back and raise it 2.5".
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:18 pmPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:33 pmTiler_J wrote:3legged_lab wrote:
Funny story on this fireplace. The framer didnt take into account the thickness of the hearth stones when framing. I had to come back and raise it 2.5".
Haha! We had some drywallers here that would forget to run the drywall all the way down to the fire box. It was in a subdivision, they did atleast 20 fireplaces with the drywall 8 inches above the box. It sucked. We had to fix them all so we could tile them.
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 10:04 pm3legged_lab wrote:Tiler_J wrote:3legged_lab wrote:
Funny story on this fireplace. The framer didnt take into account the thickness of the hearth stones when framing. I had to come back and raise it 2.5".
Haha! We had some drywallers here that would forget to run the drywall all the way down to the fire box. It was in a subdivision, they did atleast 20 fireplaces with the drywall 8 inches above the box. It sucked. We had to fix them all so we could tile them.
The best part is the GC framed it himself, then texted me and said "we need to talk about YOUR fireplace installation". Lol. After I decided it would be easier for me to uninstall, lift 2.5", and reinstall rather than him to bust the rock off the face of the hearth and cut it down he said "its really nobody's fault..."
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 10:08 amPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 11:54 amPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 11:57 amPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 1:12 pmJuice Box wrote:
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 3:01 pmPosted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 3:15 pm