assateague wrote:What Reb said.
You said all animals.
assateague wrote:What Reb said.
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
3legged_lab wrote:So now that we're completely off track, "eradicating all animals", how about back to assa's original question? Why shouldnt the govt take responsibility for their animals if they choose to take control of their animals?
If my dog kills one of jeffys lambs (and makes it out of his yard alive) im responsible for paying for the loss. If one of jeffys lambs eats an acre of my corn he's responsible for the loss. Right? Why isn't the govt responsible for their animals damages?
Woody wrote:3legged_lab wrote:So now that we're completely off track, "eradicating all animals", how about back to assa's original question? Why shouldnt the govt take responsibility for their animals if they choose to take control of their animals?
If my dog kills one of jeffys lambs (and makes it out of his yard alive) im responsible for paying for the loss. If one of jeffys lambs eats an acre of my corn he's responsible for the loss. Right? Why isn't the govt responsible for their animals damages?
No one is arguing against that point. I am just asking, where is the money coming from to accomplish that?
Olly wrote: We're still the bastard pirates of the duck forum world.
Woody wrote:3legged_lab wrote:So now that we're completely off track, "eradicating all animals", how about back to assa's original question? Why shouldnt the govt take responsibility for their animals if they choose to take control of their animals?
If my dog kills one of jeffys lambs (and makes it out of his yard alive) im responsible for paying for the loss. If one of jeffys lambs eats an acre of my corn he's responsible for the loss. Right? Why isn't the govt responsible for their animals damages?
No one is arguing against that point. I am just asking, where is the money coming from to accomplish that?
The Duck Hammer wrote:Woody wrote:3legged_lab wrote:So now that we're completely off track, "eradicating all animals", how about back to assa's original question? Why shouldnt the govt take responsibility for their animals if they choose to take control of their animals?
If my dog kills one of jeffys lambs (and makes it out of his yard alive) im responsible for paying for the loss. If one of jeffys lambs eats an acre of my corn he's responsible for the loss. Right? Why isn't the govt responsible for their animals damages?
No one is arguing against that point. I am just asking, where is the money coming from to accomplish that?
I don't know maybe the revenue from issuing tickets?
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
sws002 wrote:Woody wrote:3legged_lab wrote:So now that we're completely off track, "eradicating all animals", how about back to assa's original question? Why shouldnt the govt take responsibility for their animals if they choose to take control of their animals?
If my dog kills one of jeffys lambs (and makes it out of his yard alive) im responsible for paying for the loss. If one of jeffys lambs eats an acre of my corn he's responsible for the loss. Right? Why isn't the govt responsible for their animals damages?
No one is arguing against that point. I am just asking, where is the money coming from to accomplish that?
Perhaps we require all those fucking bird watchers to buy a habitat stamp?
rebelp74 wrote:Yeah I have a yacht, suck it bitches!
Feelin' Fowl wrote:sws002 wrote:Woody wrote:3legged_lab wrote:So now that we're completely off track, "eradicating all animals", how about back to assa's original question? Why shouldnt the govt take responsibility for their animals if they choose to take control of their animals?
If my dog kills one of jeffys lambs (and makes it out of his yard alive) im responsible for paying for the loss. If one of jeffys lambs eats an acre of my corn he's responsible for the loss. Right? Why isn't the govt responsible for their animals damages?
No one is arguing against that point. I am just asking, where is the money coming from to accomplish that?
Perhaps we require all those fucking bird watchers to buy a habitat stamp?
I like it
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
Woody wrote:3legged_lab wrote:So now that we're completely off track, "eradicating all animals", how about back to assa's original question? Why shouldnt the govt take responsibility for their animals if they choose to take control of their animals?
If my dog kills one of jeffys lambs (and makes it out of his yard alive) im responsible for paying for the loss. If one of jeffys lambs eats an acre of my corn he's responsible for the loss. Right? Why isn't the govt responsible for their animals damages?
No one is arguing against that point. I am just asking, where is the money coming from to accomplish that?
Woody wrote:3legged_lab wrote:So now that we're completely off track, "eradicating all animals", how about back to assa's original question? Why shouldnt the govt take responsibility for their animals if they choose to take control of their animals?
If my dog kills one of jeffys lambs (and makes it out of his yard alive) im responsible for paying for the loss. If one of jeffys lambs eats an acre of my corn he's responsible for the loss. Right? Why isn't the govt responsible for their animals damages?
No one is arguing against that point. I am just asking, where is the money coming from to accomplish that?
assateague wrote:Woody wrote:3legged_lab wrote:So now that we're completely off track, "eradicating all animals", how about back to assa's original question? Why shouldnt the govt take responsibility for their animals if they choose to take control of their animals?
If my dog kills one of jeffys lambs (and makes it out of his yard alive) im responsible for paying for the loss. If one of jeffys lambs eats an acre of my corn he's responsible for the loss. Right? Why isn't the govt responsible for their animals damages?
No one is arguing against that point. I am just asking, where is the money coming from to accomplish that?
Pretty sure Nuff was arguing against that point.
Woody wrote:assateague wrote:Woody wrote:3legged_lab wrote:So now that we're completely off track, "eradicating all animals", how about back to assa's original question? Why shouldnt the govt take responsibility for their animals if they choose to take control of their animals?
If my dog kills one of jeffys lambs (and makes it out of his yard alive) im responsible for paying for the loss. If one of jeffys lambs eats an acre of my corn he's responsible for the loss. Right? Why isn't the govt responsible for their animals damages?
No one is arguing against that point. I am just asking, where is the money coming from to accomplish that?
Pretty sure Nuff was arguing against that point.
Nuff doesn't know what he is arguing.
DuckMulisha wrote:My question is, how they can be charged with over limit when there isn't a season going on? They are def douches though..make the rest of hunters look bad..tisk tisk
Return to Illinois Duck Hunting Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests