Ericdc wrote:Permission to share on social media?
Sure. (Kind of nice to actually be asked.)
Ericdc wrote:Permission to share on social media?
DComeaux wrote:We need a bit of rain on that land. Driving around this weekend I noticed a lot of dust devils and clouds of dust with tractors not visible in the middle of it.
Darren wrote:Ya'll look out for the transmitter-toting birds
Rick wrote:Heard they were banding in Thornwell.
How would that help them understand what happens where the season is not closed?DComeaux wrote:Maybe they should close the season down here so the newly banded don't get shot in the next field over.
DComeaux wrote:Not unlike like those in the north where guy's fill their lanyards with bands that are days old by shooting near the release site. Yeah, that helps, lot of info gathered on those bands..........
SpinnerMan wrote:How would that help them understand what happens where the season is not closed?DComeaux wrote:Maybe they should close the season down here so the newly banded don't get shot in the next field over.DComeaux wrote:Not unlike like those in the north where guy's fill their lanyards with bands that are days old by shooting near the release site. Yeah, that helps, lot of info gathered on those bands..........
Both result in skewed data.
The second is probably a lot easier to correct for. Closing the season, now you have a bunch of birds that would have got shot, but didn't. That error propagates for years to come.
Past data should give you a good idea of how many birds should have got shot. If there is an actual spike because of band hunting, it is a one time correction to the data. You can throw out any data for birds shot within a certain distance of the banding site within a certain time and rerun your calculations and see if it has any impact.
The answer, 10% more bands, 20% more bands, whatever the banding induced mortality rate is. I'd be surprised if it is even that high, but it seems pretty easy to correct for without inconveniencing everyone in the area.
DComeaux wrote:SpinnerMan wrote:How would that help them understand what happens where the season is not closed?DComeaux wrote:Maybe they should close the season down here so the newly banded don't get shot in the next field over.DComeaux wrote:Not unlike like those in the north where guy's fill their lanyards with bands that are days old by shooting near the release site. Yeah, that helps, lot of info gathered on those bands..........
Both result in skewed data.
The second is probably a lot easier to correct for. Closing the season, now you have a bunch of birds that would have got shot, but didn't. That error propagates for years to come.
Past data should give you a good idea of how many birds should have got shot. If there is an actual spike because of band hunting, it is a one time correction to the data. You can throw out any data for birds shot within a certain distance of the banding site within a certain time and rerun your calculations and see if it has any impact.
The answer, 10% more bands, 20% more bands, whatever the banding induced mortality rate is. I'd be surprised if it is even that high, but it seems pretty easy to correct for without inconveniencing everyone in the area.
I'm with you on the bands, and they have a pretty good handle on that. Ricks post got me sidetracked on bands and I was thinking transmitters after seeing Darren's post. Transmitter application,IMO,will give a better understanding of migration changes. If these are shot near the release site the data is useless, depending on what they're trying to accomplish. I doubt seriously it's local movement.
Ericdc wrote:Rode back up to morehouse parish this evening with friend and partner in lease, Josh. Incredibly dry in the delta. All the fields except a few including ours are completely disced under and it looks like a desert.
Shoveled the muck left in bottom of pit, after pumping all the water out oct 10th. Several bull frogs and 1 small banded water snake.
Put the grates back in and zip tied stubble to the panels we use to break up hole and cover dog boxes.
Ready for specks nov 7th.
Pumps should start running nov 1 and hopefully we will have received some rain by then.
DComeaux wrote:Ericdc wrote:Rode back up to morehouse parish this evening with friend and partner in lease, Josh. Incredibly dry in the delta. All the fields except a few including ours are completely disced under and it looks like a desert.
Shoveled the muck left in bottom of pit, after pumping all the water out oct 10th. Several bull frogs and 1 small banded water snake.
Put the grates back in and zip tied stubble to the panels we use to break up hole and cover dog boxes.
Ready for specks nov 7th.
Pumps should start running nov 1 and hopefully we will have received some rain by then.
Eric, you should get Olly to set you up with a log. It would be neat to have another one to follow during the season.
Darren wrote:Hopefully this stretch from Sunday to Wednesday does you right.
Rick wrote:"Worst case" for us will be good for the farmers still cutting second crop, so there's that.
Rick wrote:Rick wrote:"Worst case" for us will be good for the farmers still cutting second crop, so there's that.
Could be I lied. Still not what we'd like for the marsh but probably enough wind along with what we got to knock down a lot of rain soaked rice. So it goes...
Rick wrote:As long as they can still combine it, knocked down rice is probably a good thing, as more grain is left in the field. But if not harvested at all, plowing or buffaloing open water to make decoys show is manipulation and baiting.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 83 guests