WaterfowlForum.Net

...to get Smith and Wessons new 9 shot(?) 9mm revolver. Looks like a nice gun for plinking.

...a Glock 42.

I would have liked to been able to buy guns when I was 12.

assateague wrote:...a Glock 42.

For CC?

A s&w 629 in 44 mag with 7.5 inch barrel or a ruger redhawk in same configuration

Sub compact XDm .40
1911 in .45
Auto loader -12 ga.
O/U - 20 ga.

Among many, many others...

...to go to Disneyland. Never done it.

ducks~n~bucks wrote:...to go to Disneyland. Never done it.

Why there?

Feelin' Fowl wrote:Sub compact XDm .40
1911 in .45
Auto loader -12 ga.
O/U - 20 ga.

Among many, many others...

Have you considered getting a Remmy 1911R1? One hell of a pistol.

R. Chapman wrote:

Feelin' Fowl wrote:Sub compact XDm .40
1911 in .45
Auto loader -12 ga.
O/U - 20 ga.

Among many, many others...

Have you considered getting a Remmy 1911R1? One hell of a pistol.

Nope. As soon as I start looking, I'll be buying. To many other priorities to start looking.

Feelin' Fowl wrote:

R. Chapman wrote:

Feelin' Fowl wrote:Sub compact XDm .40
1911 in .45
Auto loader -12 ga.
O/U - 20 ga.

Among many, many others...

Have you considered getting a Remmy 1911R1? One hell of a pistol.

Nope. As soon as I start looking, I'll be buying. To many other priorities to start looking.

Take a good look at the R1. Best 1911 for the money. They're built to the same tolerances as John Browning built them. You get them too tight of tolerances and it takes 500 or so rounds to "break" them in. Them R1s don't need breaking in. Plus the slide is like silk cocking back. Great hog leg if you need to slap leather on something.

Noted

R. Chapman wrote:

Feelin' Fowl wrote:

R. Chapman wrote:

Feelin' Fowl wrote:Sub compact XDm .40
1911 in .45
Auto loader -12 ga.
O/U - 20 ga.

Among many, many others...

Have you considered getting a Remmy 1911R1? One hell of a pistol.

Nope. As soon as I start looking, I'll be buying. To many other priorities to start looking.

Take a good look at the R1. Best 1911 for the money. They're built to the same tolerances as John Browning built them. You get them too tight of tolerances and it takes 500 or so rounds to "break" them in. Them R1s don't need breaking in. Plus the slide is like silk cocking back. Great hog leg if you need to slap leather on something.

Slap leather? Who do you think you are, John Wayne?

Bootlipkiller wrote:

R. Chapman wrote:

Feelin' Fowl wrote:

R. Chapman wrote:

Feelin' Fowl wrote:Sub compact XDm .40
1911 in .45
Auto loader -12 ga.
O/U - 20 ga.

Among many, many others...

Have you considered getting a Remmy 1911R1? One hell of a pistol.

Nope. As soon as I start looking, I'll be buying. To many other priorities to start looking.

Take a good look at the R1. Best 1911 for the money. They're built to the same tolerances as John Browning built them. You get them too tight of tolerances and it takes 500 or so rounds to "break" them in. Them R1s don't need breaking in. Plus the slide is like silk cocking back. Great hog leg if you need to slap leather on something.

Slap leather? Who do you think you are, John Wayne?

The fucker who slaps leather on groundhogs, jack rabbits, and possibly a badger.

assateague wrote:...a Glock 42.

Is that the new .380? My wife's uncle just got one.

...a Beechcraft King Air

To stop pooping

R. Chapman wrote:

Feelin' Fowl wrote:

R. Chapman wrote:

Feelin' Fowl wrote:Sub compact XDm .40
1911 in .45
Auto loader -12 ga.
O/U - 20 ga.

Among many, many others...

Have you considered getting a Remmy 1911R1? One hell of a pistol.

Nope. As soon as I start looking, I'll be buying. To many other priorities to start looking.

Take a good look at the R1. Best 1911 for the money. They're built to the same tolerances as John Browning built them. You get them too tight of tolerances and it takes 500 or so rounds to "break" them in. Them R1s don't need breaking in. Plus the slide is like silk cocking back. Great hog leg if you need to slap leather on something.

You're outside your mind. Best 1911 if you want one built with features from WWII. My vote for best bang for your buck would be Ruger. However, 1911s are a PITA, I get the fascination with them (kind of), but quite honestly unless you are going to spend the coin ($1500+) you are taking a risk. Call it 50/50

FlintRiverFowler wrote:

assateague wrote:...a Glock 42.

Is that the new .380? My wife's uncle just got one.

Yes. Steal it for me, please. PM me your address, and I'll send you 5 pork butts for your trouble. Thank you.

sws002 wrote:

R. Chapman wrote:

Feelin' Fowl wrote:

R. Chapman wrote:

Feelin' Fowl wrote:Sub compact XDm .40
1911 in .45
Auto loader -12 ga.
O/U - 20 ga.

Among many, many others...

Have you considered getting a Remmy 1911R1? One hell of a pistol.

Nope. As soon as I start looking, I'll be buying. To many other priorities to start looking.

Take a good look at the R1. Best 1911 for the money. They're built to the same tolerances as John Browning built them. You get them too tight of tolerances and it takes 500 or so rounds to "break" them in. Them R1s don't need breaking in. Plus the slide is like silk cocking back. Great hog leg if you need to slap leather on something.

You're outside your mind. Best 1911 if you want one built with features from WWII. My vote for best bang for your buck would be Ruger. However, 1911s are a PITA, I get the fascination with them (kind of), but quite honestly unless you are going to spend the coin ($1500+) you are taking a risk. Call it 50/50

I'm not talking about WWII, I'm talking about the way they originally came. Only difference between JB design and Remington is Remington has a slightly longer beavertail, and different sights.

to slap some leather...

R. Chapman wrote:

sws002 wrote:

R. Chapman wrote:

Feelin' Fowl wrote:

R. Chapman wrote:

Feelin' Fowl wrote:Sub compact XDm .40
1911 in .45
Auto loader -12 ga.
O/U - 20 ga.

Among many, many others...

Have you considered getting a Remmy 1911R1? One hell of a pistol.

Nope. As soon as I start looking, I'll be buying. To many other priorities to start looking.

Take a good look at the R1. Best 1911 for the money. They're built to the same tolerances as John Browning built them. You get them too tight of tolerances and it takes 500 or so rounds to "break" them in. Them R1s don't need breaking in. Plus the slide is like silk cocking back. Great hog leg if you need to slap leather on something.

You're outside your mind. Best 1911 if you want one built with features from WWII. My vote for best bang for your buck would be Ruger. However, 1911s are a PITA, I get the fascination with them (kind of), but quite honestly unless you are going to spend the coin ($1500+) you are taking a risk. Call it 50/50

I'm not talking about WWII, I'm talking about the way they originally came. Only difference between JB design and Remington is Remington has a slightly longer beavertail, and different sights.

Exactly, why the fuck would I want something that LOOKS like it was built 100 years ago? It doesn't hold any collector value and it doesn't have the improved function and design that have come over the past 100 years. Pass. Hard Pass.

Plus, I'd let someone else be the canary for that. Remington hasn't built a quality gun in 10 years

That's probably being generous.

Probably right.


They fucked up the 870 - what makes you think they can build a 1911??

No, I meant the "10 year" part. I'd probably go back further than that.

Yah - my comment was for RMFC. Tried editing it, but I fucked that up too. Better call Vicky and see if she can fix it.

The fact that they caved so easily pisses me off. Just shows it's a scam, and they know it. Otherwise, they would have strung you out for 3 months. "Ok, you got us- we'll just settle for this couple hundred bucks, for nothing. Sorry." Multiplied by several hundred thousand who may dispute it, never mind the other 3 million who won't. Fuck those guys. Like Comcast raising the price for their cable boxes by $1. "But it's just a dollar." Yeah, multiplied by the 31 MILLION video subscribers they have. That's a nice little addition to the monthly revenue. For nothing.

assateague wrote:The fact that they caved so easily pisses me off. Just shows it's a scam, and they know it. Otherwise, they would have strung you out for 3 months. "Ok, you got us- we'll just settle for this couple hundred bucks, for nothing. Sorry." Multiplied by several hundred thousand who may dispute it, never mind the other 3 million who won't. Fuck those guys. Like Comcast raising the price for their cable boxes by $1. "But it's just a dollar." Yeah, multiplied by the 31 MILLION video subscribers they have. That's a nice little addition to the monthly revenue. For nothing.

Dish just did that to me. Raises the rental on the box from 10 to 12. The guy said he would credit me $6 for the 3 months - big deal. I told him I dont give a shit about 6 dollars, I lose that or more in the laundry every week, the he hung up on me. Haha

DeadEye_Dan wrote:Probably right.


They fucked up the 870 - what makes you think they can build a 1911??

Have you actually even picked one up at a shop and finger fucked it a little? I own one, and like the dickens out of it. I don't why you'd pay 2x the amount on a Kimber or Para when the R1s are just fine a really a good gun that's accurate. Just my thought.