I would like...
Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2014 9:51 am
...to get Smith and Wessons new 9 shot(?) 9mm revolver. Looks like a nice gun for plinking.
Duck Hunting Forum, Goose Hunting Forum, Waterfowl Hunting, Duck Boats.
https://www.waterfowlforum.net/
assateague wrote:...a Glock 42.
ducks~n~bucks wrote:...to go to Disneyland. Never done it.
Feelin' Fowl wrote:Sub compact XDm .40
1911 in .45
Auto loader -12 ga.
O/U - 20 ga.
Among many, many others...
R. Chapman wrote:Feelin' Fowl wrote:Sub compact XDm .40
1911 in .45
Auto loader -12 ga.
O/U - 20 ga.
Among many, many others...
Have you considered getting a Remmy 1911R1? One hell of a pistol.
Feelin' Fowl wrote:R. Chapman wrote:Feelin' Fowl wrote:Sub compact XDm .40
1911 in .45
Auto loader -12 ga.
O/U - 20 ga.
Among many, many others...
Have you considered getting a Remmy 1911R1? One hell of a pistol.
Nope. As soon as I start looking, I'll be buying. To many other priorities to start looking.
R. Chapman wrote:Feelin' Fowl wrote:R. Chapman wrote:Feelin' Fowl wrote:Sub compact XDm .40
1911 in .45
Auto loader -12 ga.
O/U - 20 ga.
Among many, many others...
Have you considered getting a Remmy 1911R1? One hell of a pistol.
Nope. As soon as I start looking, I'll be buying. To many other priorities to start looking.
Take a good look at the R1. Best 1911 for the money. They're built to the same tolerances as John Browning built them. You get them too tight of tolerances and it takes 500 or so rounds to "break" them in. Them R1s don't need breaking in. Plus the slide is like silk cocking back. Great hog leg if you need to slap leather on something.
Bootlipkiller wrote:R. Chapman wrote:Feelin' Fowl wrote:R. Chapman wrote:Feelin' Fowl wrote:Sub compact XDm .40
1911 in .45
Auto loader -12 ga.
O/U - 20 ga.
Among many, many others...
Have you considered getting a Remmy 1911R1? One hell of a pistol.
Nope. As soon as I start looking, I'll be buying. To many other priorities to start looking.
Take a good look at the R1. Best 1911 for the money. They're built to the same tolerances as John Browning built them. You get them too tight of tolerances and it takes 500 or so rounds to "break" them in. Them R1s don't need breaking in. Plus the slide is like silk cocking back. Great hog leg if you need to slap leather on something.
Slap leather? Who do you think you are, John Wayne?
assateague wrote:...a Glock 42.
R. Chapman wrote:Feelin' Fowl wrote:R. Chapman wrote:Feelin' Fowl wrote:Sub compact XDm .40
1911 in .45
Auto loader -12 ga.
O/U - 20 ga.
Among many, many others...
Have you considered getting a Remmy 1911R1? One hell of a pistol.
Nope. As soon as I start looking, I'll be buying. To many other priorities to start looking.
Take a good look at the R1. Best 1911 for the money. They're built to the same tolerances as John Browning built them. You get them too tight of tolerances and it takes 500 or so rounds to "break" them in. Them R1s don't need breaking in. Plus the slide is like silk cocking back. Great hog leg if you need to slap leather on something.
FlintRiverFowler wrote:assateague wrote:...a Glock 42.
Is that the new .380? My wife's uncle just got one.
sws002 wrote:R. Chapman wrote:Feelin' Fowl wrote:R. Chapman wrote:Feelin' Fowl wrote:Sub compact XDm .40
1911 in .45
Auto loader -12 ga.
O/U - 20 ga.
Among many, many others...
Have you considered getting a Remmy 1911R1? One hell of a pistol.
Nope. As soon as I start looking, I'll be buying. To many other priorities to start looking.
Take a good look at the R1. Best 1911 for the money. They're built to the same tolerances as John Browning built them. You get them too tight of tolerances and it takes 500 or so rounds to "break" them in. Them R1s don't need breaking in. Plus the slide is like silk cocking back. Great hog leg if you need to slap leather on something.
You're outside your mind. Best 1911 if you want one built with features from WWII. My vote for best bang for your buck would be Ruger. However, 1911s are a PITA, I get the fascination with them (kind of), but quite honestly unless you are going to spend the coin ($1500+) you are taking a risk. Call it 50/50
R. Chapman wrote:sws002 wrote:R. Chapman wrote:Feelin' Fowl wrote:R. Chapman wrote:Feelin' Fowl wrote:Sub compact XDm .40
1911 in .45
Auto loader -12 ga.
O/U - 20 ga.
Among many, many others...
Have you considered getting a Remmy 1911R1? One hell of a pistol.
Nope. As soon as I start looking, I'll be buying. To many other priorities to start looking.
Take a good look at the R1. Best 1911 for the money. They're built to the same tolerances as John Browning built them. You get them too tight of tolerances and it takes 500 or so rounds to "break" them in. Them R1s don't need breaking in. Plus the slide is like silk cocking back. Great hog leg if you need to slap leather on something.
You're outside your mind. Best 1911 if you want one built with features from WWII. My vote for best bang for your buck would be Ruger. However, 1911s are a PITA, I get the fascination with them (kind of), but quite honestly unless you are going to spend the coin ($1500+) you are taking a risk. Call it 50/50
I'm not talking about WWII, I'm talking about the way they originally came. Only difference between JB design and Remington is Remington has a slightly longer beavertail, and different sights.
assateague wrote:The fact that they caved so easily pisses me off. Just shows it's a scam, and they know it. Otherwise, they would have strung you out for 3 months. "Ok, you got us- we'll just settle for this couple hundred bucks, for nothing. Sorry." Multiplied by several hundred thousand who may dispute it, never mind the other 3 million who won't. Fuck those guys. Like Comcast raising the price for their cable boxes by $1. "But it's just a dollar." Yeah, multiplied by the 31 MILLION video subscribers they have. That's a nice little addition to the monthly revenue. For nothing.
DeadEye_Dan wrote:Probably right.
They fucked up the 870 - what makes you think they can build a 1911??