assateague wrote:Catch any crapgills lately?
Needed that laugh...work sucks today
assateague wrote:Catch any crapgills lately?
Mornin Beef wrote:It would be so much easier to take part in online discussions if you bozos knew something about fish...really anything resembling a coherent thought would be a great starting point. I'll keep waiting.
bill herian wrote:Mornin Beef wrote:It would be so much easier to take part in online discussions if you bozos knew something about fish...really anything resembling a coherent thought would be a great starting point. I'll keep waiting.
I'm trying to learn about fish, that's why I asked what a chinho is.
Now can the hostility before I get this thread locked.
AKPirate wrote:The sins of Boot and Gaddy are causing the Cali drought and knowing they have no limits to their depravity... :mrgreen:
Bootlipkiller wrote:I catch a lot of king chinook crosses! :):)
AKPirate wrote:Bootlipkiller wrote:I catch a lot of king chinook crosses! :):)
I have caught exactly the same amount of rainbow-steelhead crosses as I have of silver-coho crosses
AKPirate wrote:The sins of Boot and Gaddy are causing the Cali drought and knowing they have no limits to their depravity... :mrgreen:
Bootlipkiller wrote:AKPirate wrote:Bootlipkiller wrote:I catch a lot of king chinook crosses! :):)
I have caught exactly the same amount of rainbow-steelhead crosses as I have of silver-coho crosses
That's almost as rare as a sprig pintail cross!
AKPirate wrote:Bootlipkiller wrote:AKPirate wrote:Bootlipkiller wrote:I catch a lot of king chinook crosses! :):)
I have caught exactly the same amount of rainbow-steelhead crosses as I have of silver-coho crosses
That's almost as rare as a sprig pintail cross!
Let's call that a sprintail from now on. Wonder if they can fertilize chinho eggs?
AKPirate wrote:The sins of Boot and Gaddy are causing the Cali drought and knowing they have no limits to their depravity... :mrgreen:
Bootlipkiller wrote:AKPirate wrote:Bootlipkiller wrote:AKPirate wrote:Bootlipkiller wrote:I catch a lot of king chinook crosses! :):)
I have caught exactly the same amount of rainbow-steelhead crosses as I have of silver-coho crosses
That's almost as rare as a sprig pintail cross!
Let's call that a sprintail from now on. Wonder if they can fertilize chinho eggs?
I think it's highly possible. The result would probably be the birth of a Morning Beef.
AKPirate wrote:Bootlipkiller wrote:AKPirate wrote:Bootlipkiller wrote:AKPirate wrote:[quote="Bootlipkiller"]I catch a lot of king chinook crosses! :):)
I have caught exactly the same amount of rainbow-steelhead crosses as I have of silver-coho crosses
That's almost as rare as a sprig pintail cross!
Let's call that a sprintail from now on. Wonder if they can fertilize chinho eggs?
I think it's highly possible. The result would probably be the birth of a Morning Beef.
AKPirate wrote:The sins of Boot and Gaddy are causing the Cali drought and knowing they have no limits to their depravity... :mrgreen:
Mornin Beef wrote:The salmon river in paluski ny has natural repro for both kings and cohos and there is a window of overlap there relative to spawning. Sans genetic info you're left with observations of phenotype. Black gums with only the upper half of the tail fin spotted for example or some other melding of diagnostic features generally lends to a conclusion of hybridization. I see one pic on average posted around per year. Very rare but possible. Never worked in a hatchery but would presume its a very sterile atmospere with little or no chance of cross breeding. But who knows maybe there was a young tech prankster who thought it would be cool to mix up a few batches.
bill herian wrote:Mornin Beef wrote:The salmon river in paluski ny has natural repro for both kings and cohos and there is a window of overlap there relative to spawning. Sans genetic info you're left with observations of phenotype. Black gums with only the upper half of the tail fin spotted for example or some other melding of diagnostic features generally lends to a conclusion of hybridization. I see one pic on average posted around per year. Very rare but possible. Never worked in a hatchery but would presume its a very sterile atmospere with little or no chance of cross breeding. But who knows maybe there was a young tech prankster who thought it would be cool to mix up a few batches.
Now we're getting somewhere.
Phenotype means diddly. There are a few hot shot bios (and many more than a few anglers) out there who think they can detemine crosses by pheno alone. Studies done on walleye/sauger/saugeye crosses have repeadtley embarrassed these jokers when the genetic workup comes through.
Whats the first assumption in evolutionary theory? There is variation within the species. Just because it dosen't like the rest dosen't mean it isn't the same.
If you hunted an area where every buck had a typical 8 point rack, and your buddy shot a 10 pointer, would you say it isn't a whitetail?
bill herian wrote:Mornin Beef wrote:The salmon river in paluski ny has natural repro for both kings and cohos and there is a window of overlap there relative to spawning. Sans genetic info you're left with observations of phenotype. Black gums with only the upper half of the tail fin spotted for example or some other melding of diagnostic features generally lends to a conclusion of hybridization. I see one pic on average posted around per year. Very rare but possible. Never worked in a hatchery but would presume its a very sterile atmospere with little or no chance of cross breeding. But who knows maybe there was a young tech prankster who thought it would be cool to mix up a few batches.
Now we're getting somewhere.
Phenotype means diddly. There are a few hot shot bios (and many more than a few anglers) out there who think they can detemine crosses by pheno alone. Studies done on walleye/sauger/saugeye crosses have repeadtley embarrassed these jokers when the genetic workup comes through.
Whats the first assumption in evolutionary theory? There is variation within the species. Just because it dosen't like the rest dosen't mean it isn't the same.
If you hunted an area where every buck had a typical 8 point rack, and your buddy shot a 10 pointer, would you say it isn't a whitetail?
assateague wrote:I would if it had a black tail.
bill herian wrote:assateague wrote:I would if it had a black tail.
Stahp it.
rebelp74 wrote:eat-mor-cheez, typed in the chic-fil-a font on a sign held up by a hop
bill herian wrote:Just slurring a little.
I found out yesterday that Wisconsin is #4 in beer consumption per capita.
I've been working all day to rectify the situation.
bill herian wrote:Mornin Beef wrote:The salmon river in paluski ny has natural repro for both kings and cohos and there is a window of overlap there relative to spawning. Sans genetic info you're left with observations of phenotype. Black gums with only the upper half of the tail fin spotted for example or some other melding of diagnostic features generally lends to a conclusion of hybridization. I see one pic on average posted around per year. Very rare but possible. Never worked in a hatchery but would presume its a very sterile atmospere with little or no chance of cross breeding. But who knows maybe there was a young tech prankster who thought it would be cool to mix up a few batches.
Now we're getting somewhere.
Phenotype means diddly. There are a few hot shot bios (and many more than a few anglers) out there who think they can detemine crosses by pheno alone. Studies done on walleye/sauger/saugeye crosses have repeadtley embarrassed these jokers when the genetic workup comes through.
Whats the first assumption in evolutionary theory? There is variation within the species. Just because it dosen't like the rest dosen't mean it isn't the same.
If you hunted an area where every buck had a typical 8 point rack, and your buddy shot a 10 pointer, would you say it isn't a whitetail?
bill herian wrote:Just slurring a little.
I found out yesterday that Wisconsin is #4 in beer consumption per capita.
I've been working all day to rectify the situation.
assateague wrote:bill herian wrote:Just slurring a little.
I found out yesterday that Wisconsin is #4 in beer consumption per capita.
I've been working all day to rectify the situation.
#6, actually.
assateague wrote:If it's any consolation, I am looking at "new" football teams, in case this latest attack on the Redskins works, and they cave in. If they change their name, right now the Packers are in first place to replace them. I was leaning toward the Cowboys, since that is as far as you can get from the Redskins, but just don't think I can do it. But the Packers fit the bill, for now.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests