Rick wrote:SpinnerMan wrote:It might not be so much a problem of them stopping short as it seemed like plenty of them continue to head to points much further south as always. It looks more like a local problem than a general problem of them not heading south.
When I asked Southwest Louisiana based waterfowl biologist, Paul Link, for his thoughts on what's happening here, he didn't say "Fat cats' corn soup up North". He said, "Look around."
Loss of
meaningful habitat and crazy pressure aren't the whole issue, of course, but little doubt much of it.
I've thought about this issue a lot trying to keep an open mind, and the habitat and pressure theory bothers me. Sure, the marsh has changed a bit south of Highway 82, but the fresh marsh north, not so much. As for pressure down there, it's been the same for generations. Those long-established, well-managed places are now experiencing what many have for quite a few years now. We've /I've witnessed shifts east and west with bird distribution along the coast from year to year, with progressions to either side for a short while, but not this total lack of waterfowl in all areas.
Knowing how easy feed attracts and holds waterfowl, it's not hard to believe that enhanced waterfowl areas in the northern part of the flyway coupled with low numbers of breeding waterfowl along with low hatch numbers due to degraded nesting habitat combine to make our situation the way it is. I would love to see what a population explosion would do to the "short-stopping" theory.
We have no good data on the number of waterfowl in the Mississippi flyway that overfly Louisiana and winter in South America and Mexico. Using the refuge as a gage, I know the build-up numbers, disappearance, and replenishment in the early season with frontal passage is not what it used to be.
With that said, I'm going to ride it out this year, hopefully storm free and see how it goes down there. I currently don't have a warm and fuzzy feeling with our "waterfowl management professionals".