WaterfowlForum.Net

The Duck Hammer wrote:So we need a forum just for you and DNB to parade around in?

3legged_lab wrote:If we make one, will you guys only stay within it?

3legged_lab wrote:Only able to "graduate" to the main forum after you turn 18?

3legged_lab wrote:Only able to "graduate" to the main forum after you turn 18?

capt1972 wrote:

The Duck Hammer wrote:So we need a forum just for you and DNB to parade around in?

while its raining.

Goldfish wrote:

capt1972 wrote:

The Duck Hammer wrote:So we need a forum just for you and DNB to parade around in?

while its raining.

capt1972 wrote:

Goldfish wrote:

capt1972 wrote:

The Duck Hammer wrote:So we need a forum just for you and DNB to parade around in?

while its raining.

Goldfish wrote:You changed the picture, and I don't even remember what the other one was, lol

Olly wrote:Rex, the guys have pointed out why we don't have one. You, DNB and Jehler's son are the only under 18 guys here. It would be a nit of a waste.

Thanks for the suggestion though.

R. Chapman wrote:

Olly wrote:Rex, the guys have pointed out why we don't have one. You, DNB and Jehler's son are the only under 18 guys here. It would be a nit of a waste.

Thanks for the suggestion though.

So why not promote it?

RonE wrote:

R. Chapman wrote:

Olly wrote:Rex, the guys have pointed out why we don't have one. You, DNB and Jehler's son are the only under 18 guys here. It would be a nit of a waste.

Thanks for the suggestion though.

So why not promote it?

OK, here is how it is. We don't mind you sharing your views with our views on almost any topic but you wouldn't like for some of us older guys getting into the youth forum. Another thing we have that you don't have is the Hawaii forum and if we had to get "Permission" to get into the youth forum we wouldn't like that. WFF is not a democratic organization, it is not a democratic republic, and it certainly isn't a free for all........It is best to think of WFF and a Benevolent Dictatorship and Olly is the man in the top seat...........So when Olly says: "No Youth Forum", just take that as it is and quit being a winey bitch.

R. Chapman wrote:

Olly wrote:Rex, the guys have pointed out why we don't have one. You, DNB and Jehler's son are the only under 18 guys here. It would be a nit of a waste.

Thanks for the suggestion though.

So why not promote it?

DeadEye_Dan wrote:Fill a forum full of teenage boy loaded up with hormones, convinced they know everything

Redbeard wrote:

DeadEye_Dan wrote:Fill a forum full of teenage boy loaded up with hormones, convinced they know everything

come on dan when have ya seen that lately

aunt betty wrote:Wouldn't an age-specific forum be considered discrimination?
Possibly Mister Olly don't want to open that can of worms.

I'm not so sure a youth forum is such a good idea.
Well, maybe we could let FF be the babysitter.

aunt betty wrote:Wouldn't an age-specific forum be considered discrimination?
Possibly Mister Olly don't want to open that can of worms.

I'm not so sure a youth forum is such a good idea.
Well, maybe we could let FF be the babysitter.

Feelin' Fowl wrote:

aunt betty wrote:Wouldn't an age-specific forum be considered discrimination?
Possibly Mister Olly don't want to open that can of worms.

I'm not so sure a youth forum is such a good idea.
Well, maybe we could let FF be the babysitter.

No dice!

R. Chapman wrote:

aunt betty wrote:Wouldn't an age-specific forum be considered discrimination?
Possibly Mister Olly don't want to open that can of worms.

I'm not so sure a youth forum is such a good idea.
Well, maybe we could let FF be the babysitter.

Dirty ducks would be age-specific discrimination as well, but I also can understand why it is.

Redbeard wrote:

DeadEye_Dan wrote:Fill a forum full of teenage boy loaded up with hormones, convinced they know everything

come on dan when have ya seen that lately