assateague wrote:Brew, are the crosshairs on your scope fine, or are they sort of "in the way"? In all the images of what the view is like, the lighted reticle looks sort of "bulky".
get a supressor for that and we'll be all set.BrewGUN wrote:Depends on your rifle, but forming and most rifles it's needed, very little eye relief. For my .22 mag savage I actually had to file if part if it that hung over the rear so my bolt could open, but it also has really low bases, if I bought medium bases it prob would have cleared, but its tall enough already!
JGUN wrote:get a supressor for that and we'll be all set.BrewGUN wrote:Depends on your rifle, but forming and most rifles it's needed, very little eye relief. For my .22 mag savage I actually had to file if part if it that hung over the rear so my bolt could open, but it also has really low bases, if I bought medium bases it prob would have cleared, but its tall enough already!
assateague wrote:I don't know a whole lot of people who hunt ducks with a .22 mag, anyway.
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
Rick Ican only imagine the shit youve seenwaterfowlman wrote:Assa.....that video brought back memories of all the hours I have spent staring through a starlight scope way back when. Doesn't have the green tinted images but does have the same feeling. Nowadays the technology has advanced to some really amazing equipment available to all of us. We have been running FLIR on all of our boats the past few years and it can even pick up small birds flying at night from some pretty long distances, show me buoys and small boats through pea soup fog and even which cars driving past the marina need brake jobs (heat signature)
gila-river wrote:Great, now the cops want to install dishwashers to. Just do your job Red and stop encroaching on our rights to replace appliances. That is not the responsibility of police.:lol:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 117 guests