AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Place for general and off topic Waterfowl talk.

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby DeadEye_Dan » Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:19 pm

(MT)Montanafowler wrote:
DeadEye_Dan wrote:Great.
Draft a letter to USFW, tell them they have nothing to worry about because a 2nd year WB major said so.
I'll personally deliver it at the Flyway Meetings in July & I'll load the tears of laughter that result to YouTube an post them here.

Seriously - do you have a career "plan B"?



dan, you started this. i simply stated my own opinion concerning calling a guy a poacher or not, you took it above and beyond. for fuck sakes, calm down. why are you getting so bent out of shape over this anyway?


Because we as hunters should be the No. 1 proponents of wildlife stewardship, and to hear a guy who says he wants to make Wildlife Biology his life's work argue for baiting wildfowl for the purpose of hunting is easily the dumbest fucking thing I've heard in quite some time.

You want to make baiting legal so you can kill more ducks - fuck whatever the last 100 years of science and research have told us about how it will affect the population.

I don't give a shit that Reb baits and kills ducks - but it's utterly mind boggling that a guy studying WB with an expressed goal of working for a State wildlife agency would have the views you do.

And I didn't start it - you're the one that jumped to the defense of a poacher by trying to justify baiting.
Cover your ears, Darlin'
User avatar
DeadEye_Dan
WFF Supporter
 
Posts: 7164
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:59 am
Location: The Zoo

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby Bootlipkiller » Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:22 pm

3legged_lab wrote:
(MT)Montanafowler wrote:
DeadEye_Dan wrote:Holy shit.

It's regulated now.

Why the fuck do you think we have the laws we have?

Hey guys - I guess we can go back to shooting lead, piss on bag limits, hen restrictions, and generally anything else that was put in place to help bird populations.

Seriously. Quit your pursuit of Wildlife Biology - it's idiot thinking like yours that's going to get us stuck with 3/30 seasons again.


once again Dan, you present a slippery slope.

i don't really care for regulation, but some laws on the books should be repealed. i think this is one of them. All i have said is it's not the worst law in the world that could be broken.

you still haven't presented any scientific data.

Redbeard wrote:you sure get a lot more sensitive when ya argue with me and I've never even called you stupid


because i'm always traumatized by your police brutality ;) i'm really not sensitive Red :thumbsup:

What's the "slippery slope"?.


I believe it's a term used when one is failing at an argument on duck forums.

Other examples...
"Apples and oranges" Or Pointing out grammatical errors. Because your argument is sinking faster then the titanic. :lol:
AKPirate wrote:The sins of Boot and Gaddy are causing the Cali drought and knowing they have no limits to their depravity... :mrgreen:
User avatar
Bootlipkiller
 
Posts: 14361
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 4:47 am
Location: you stay classy Sutter County... Im Ron Burgandy???

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby The Duck Hammer » Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:23 pm

Cream Corn
“When you're at the end of your rope, tie a knot and hold on” - Theodore Roosevelt

Olly wrote: We're still the bastard pirates of the duck forum world.


WFF Prostaff
User avatar
The Duck Hammer
 
Posts: 14027
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 7:42 pm
Location: The Chicken House

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby rebelp74 » Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:24 pm

DeadEye_Dan wrote:
(MT)Montanafowler wrote:
DeadEye_Dan wrote:Great.
Draft a letter to USFW, tell them they have nothing to worry about because a 2nd year WB major said so.
I'll personally deliver it at the Flyway Meetings in July & I'll load the tears of laughter that result to YouTube an post them here.

Seriously - do you have a career "plan B"?



dan, you started this. i simply stated my own opinion concerning calling a guy a poacher or not, you took it above and beyond. for fuck sakes, calm down. why are you getting so bent out of shape over this anyway?


Because we as hunters should be the No. 1 proponents of wildlife stewardship, and to hear a guy who says he wants to make Wildlife Biology his life's work argue for baiting wildfowl for the purpose of hunting is easily the dumbest fucking thing I've heard in quite some time.

You want to make baiting legal so you can kill more ducks - fuck whatever the last 100 years of science and research have told us about how it will affect the population.

I don't give a shit that Reb baits and kills ducks - but it's utterly mind boggling that a guy studying WB with an expressed goal of working for a State wildlife agency would have the views you do.

And I didn't start it - you're the one that jumped to the defense of a poacher by trying to justify baiting.

In my defense, I only hunt it once a year but and never kill over 100(well I have once), but I don't so that there will be plenty of birds to come back each year.
Reinstate TomKat

4-20MJ
User avatar
rebelp74
 
Posts: 12506
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:49 am
Location: nw louisiana

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby capt1972 » Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:25 pm

The Duck Hammer wrote:Cream Corn

Brilliant! It will dissipate in the water. Bye bye evidence
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

The Tree of Liberty Must be Refreshed From Time to Time With the BLOOD OF TYRANTS
User avatar
capt1972
WFF Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 5582
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2012 6:33 pm
Location: Where the ducks arnt

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby Bootlipkiller » Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:27 pm

The Duck Hammer wrote:Cream Corn

:lol:
AKPirate wrote:The sins of Boot and Gaddy are causing the Cali drought and knowing they have no limits to their depravity... :mrgreen:
User avatar
Bootlipkiller
 
Posts: 14361
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 4:47 am
Location: you stay classy Sutter County... Im Ron Burgandy???

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby Flightstopper » Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:27 pm

Bootlipkiller wrote:
The Duck Hammer wrote:Cream Corn

:lol:


Well played.
AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
User avatar
Flightstopper
WFF Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 9754
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:46 pm
Location: Pflugerville, Tx

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby The Duck Hammer » Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:28 pm

capt1972 wrote:
The Duck Hammer wrote:Cream Corn

Brilliant! It will dissipate in the water. Bye bye evidence


That didn't go as planned. It was supposed to lighten the mood but I see how that could go the wrong way in hindsight.
“When you're at the end of your rope, tie a knot and hold on” - Theodore Roosevelt

Olly wrote: We're still the bastard pirates of the duck forum world.


WFF Prostaff
User avatar
The Duck Hammer
 
Posts: 14027
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 7:42 pm
Location: The Chicken House

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby NuffDaddy » Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:29 pm

rebelp74 wrote:
DeadEye_Dan wrote:
(MT)Montanafowler wrote:
DeadEye_Dan wrote:Great.
Draft a letter to USFW, tell them they have nothing to worry about because a 2nd year WB major said so.
I'll personally deliver it at the Flyway Meetings in July & I'll load the tears of laughter that result to YouTube an post them here.

Seriously - do you have a career "plan B"?



dan, you started this. i simply stated my own opinion concerning calling a guy a poacher or not, you took it above and beyond. for fuck sakes, calm down. why are you getting so bent out of shape over this anyway?


Because we as hunters should be the No. 1 proponents of wildlife stewardship, and to hear a guy who says he wants to make Wildlife Biology his life's work argue for baiting wildfowl for the purpose of hunting is easily the dumbest fucking thing I've heard in quite some time.

You want to make baiting legal so you can kill more ducks - fuck whatever the last 100 years of science and research have told us about how it will affect the population.

I don't give a shit that Reb baits and kills ducks - but it's utterly mind boggling that a guy studying WB with an expressed goal of working for a State wildlife agency would have the views you do.

And I didn't start it - you're the one that jumped to the defense of a poacher by trying to justify baiting.

In my defense, I only hunt it once a year but and never kill over 100(well I have once), but I don't so that there will be plenty of birds to come back each year.

That just sounds like a lot of work.
User avatar
NuffDaddy
WFF Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 2:05 pm
Location: Saginaw Bay, Michigan

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby rebelp74 » Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:31 pm

NuffDaddy wrote:
rebelp74 wrote:
DeadEye_Dan wrote:
(MT)Montanafowler wrote:
DeadEye_Dan wrote:Great.
Draft a letter to USFW, tell them they have nothing to worry about because a 2nd year WB major said so.
I'll personally deliver it at the Flyway Meetings in July & I'll load the tears of laughter that result to YouTube an post them here.

Seriously - do you have a career "plan B"?



dan, you started this. i simply stated my own opinion concerning calling a guy a poacher or not, you took it above and beyond. for fuck sakes, calm down. why are you getting so bent out of shape over this anyway?


Because we as hunters should be the No. 1 proponents of wildlife stewardship, and to hear a guy who says he wants to make Wildlife Biology his life's work argue for baiting wildfowl for the purpose of hunting is easily the dumbest fucking thing I've heard in quite some time.

You want to make baiting legal so you can kill more ducks - fuck whatever the last 100 years of science and research have told us about how it will affect the population.

I don't give a shit that Reb baits and kills ducks - but it's utterly mind boggling that a guy studying WB with an expressed goal of working for a State wildlife agency would have the views you do.

And I didn't start it - you're the one that jumped to the defense of a poacher by trying to justify baiting.

In my defense, I only hunt it once a year but and never kill over 100(well I have once), but I don't so that there will be plenty of birds to come back each year.

That just sounds like a lot of work.

It is, especially when it's cold.
Reinstate TomKat

4-20MJ
User avatar
rebelp74
 
Posts: 12506
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:49 am
Location: nw louisiana

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby capt1972 » Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:32 pm

The Duck Hammer wrote:
capt1972 wrote:
The Duck Hammer wrote:Cream Corn

Brilliant! It will dissipate in the water. Bye bye evidence


That didn't go as planned. It was supposed to lighten the mood but I see how that could go the wrong way in hindsight.

I knew what you were doing, it was me that sent that down that road Image
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

The Tree of Liberty Must be Refreshed From Time to Time With the BLOOD OF TYRANTS
User avatar
capt1972
WFF Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 5582
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2012 6:33 pm
Location: Where the ducks arnt

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby The Duck Hammer » Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:34 pm

capt1972 wrote:
The Duck Hammer wrote:
capt1972 wrote:
The Duck Hammer wrote:Cream Corn

Brilliant! It will dissipate in the water. Bye bye evidence


That didn't go as planned. It was supposed to lighten the mood but I see how that could go the wrong way in hindsight.

I knew what you were doing, it was me that sent that down that road Image

:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
“When you're at the end of your rope, tie a knot and hold on” - Theodore Roosevelt

Olly wrote: We're still the bastard pirates of the duck forum world.


WFF Prostaff
User avatar
The Duck Hammer
 
Posts: 14027
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 7:42 pm
Location: The Chicken House

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby (MT)Montanafowler » Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:43 pm

DeadEye_Dan wrote:
(MT)Montanafowler wrote:
DeadEye_Dan wrote:Great.
Draft a letter to USFW, tell them they have nothing to worry about because a 2nd year WB major said so.
I'll personally deliver it at the Flyway Meetings in July & I'll load the tears of laughter that result to YouTube an post them here.

Seriously - do you have a career "plan B"?



dan, you started this. i simply stated my own opinion concerning calling a guy a poacher or not, you took it above and beyond. for fuck sakes, calm down. why are you getting so bent out of shape over this anyway?


Because we as hunters should be the No. 1 proponents of wildlife stewardship, and to hear a guy who says he wants to make Wildlife Biology his life's work argue for baiting wildfowl for the purpose of hunting is easily the dumbest fucking thing I've heard in quite some time.

You want to make baiting legal so you can kill more ducks - fuck whatever the last 100 years of science and research have told us about how it will affect the population.

I don't give a shit that Reb baits and kills ducks - but it's utterly mind boggling that a guy studying WB with an expressed goal of working for a State wildlife agency would have the views you do.

And I didn't start it - you're the one that jumped to the defense of a poacher by trying to justify baiting.


i'm just arguing against you dude, i never stated i am either for or against baiting. you took my statement and ran with it, so i played devil's advocate. sorry you got bent out of shape.

once again, i simply don't think it's that big of a deal to get worked up over. my opinion is that if he did it, it was really poor judgement on his part, and that he broke the law. in the end, he put grain on the ground and shot some ducks that flew down to eat it. i consider that far different than a guy who shoots banded birds in a park with a pellet gun. i think everyone jumping up and calling him a poacher is a bit harsh, nobody knows what really went on yet. when the actual events are revealed, then you can call him a poacher, but i'll still think it's harsh.

personally, i think baiting is stupid, and i've never done it.

do i think some wildlife laws are really stupid-yes. even if i was hired at a state agency i wouldn't necessarily agree with everything they did. i think some laws are very archaic and don't really apply today, that's just my opinion. Montana has a law that says something along the lines of you can't have any electronic aid that enables you to coordinate in the field. the way the law is written, you could get a ticket for possession of a cell phone if they really wanted to get you. laws like that need to be repealed or rewritten with better context in my opinion.

sorry to piss you off dude, no hard feelings?
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:18 pm
huntall6 wrote:MT is right.



totally sig worthy!
User avatar
(MT)Montanafowler
 
Posts: 3707
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 4:19 pm

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby Redbeard » Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:47 pm

Bootlipkiller wrote:
3legged_lab wrote:
(MT)Montanafowler wrote:
DeadEye_Dan wrote:Holy shit.

It's regulated now.

Why the fuck do you think we have the laws we have?

Hey guys - I guess we can go back to shooting lead, piss on bag limits, hen restrictions, and generally anything else that was put in place to help bird populations.

Seriously. Quit your pursuit of Wildlife Biology - it's idiot thinking like yours that's going to get us stuck with 3/30 seasons again.


once again Dan, you present a slippery slope.

i don't really care for regulation, but some laws on the books should be repealed. i think this is one of them. All i have said is it's not the worst law in the world that could be broken.

you still haven't presented any scientific data.

Redbeard wrote:you sure get a lot more sensitive when ya argue with me and I've never even called you stupid


because i'm always traumatized by your police brutality ;) i'm really not sensitive Red :thumbsup:

What's the "slippery slope"?.


I believe it's a term used when one is failing at an argument on duck forums.

Other examples...
"Apples and oranges" Or Pointing out grammatical errors. Because your argument is sinking faster then the titanic. :lol:
HAHAHA
gila-river wrote:Great, now the cops want to install dishwashers to. Just do your job Red and stop encroaching on our rights to replace appliances. That is not the responsibility of police.:lol:
User avatar
Redbeard
 
Posts: 20636
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 10:09 pm
Location: Humboldt County

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby 3legged_lab » Sun Nov 24, 2013 9:49 pm

Bootlipkiller wrote:
3legged_lab wrote:
(MT)Montanafowler wrote:
DeadEye_Dan wrote:Holy shit.

It's regulated now.

Why the fuck do you think we have the laws we have?

Hey guys - I guess we can go back to shooting lead, piss on bag limits, hen restrictions, and generally anything else that was put in place to help bird populations.

Seriously. Quit your pursuit of Wildlife Biology - it's idiot thinking like yours that's going to get us stuck with 3/30 seasons again.


once again Dan, you present a slippery slope.

i don't really care for regulation, but some laws on the books should be repealed. i think this is one of them. All i have said is it's not the worst law in the world that could be broken.

you still haven't presented any scientific data.

Redbeard wrote:you sure get a lot more sensitive when ya argue with me and I've never even called you stupid


because i'm always traumatized by your police brutality ;) i'm really not sensitive Red :thumbsup:

What's the "slippery slope"?.


I believe it's a term used when one is failing at an argument on duck forums.

Other examples...
"Apples and oranges" Or Pointing out grammatical errors. Because your argument is sinking faster then the titanic. :lol:


:lol::lol::lol:

And I was actually asking what the slippery slope of this argument was. Since it was tossed out 3 times I figured it was a tactic.
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
User avatar
3legged_lab
WFF Supporter
 
Posts: 17344
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:19 pm
Location: OREGON

AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby DeadEye_Dan » Sun Nov 24, 2013 10:18 pm

(MT)Montanafowler wrote:
DeadEye_Dan wrote:
(MT)Montanafowler wrote:
DeadEye_Dan wrote:Great.
Draft a letter to USFW, tell them they have nothing to worry about because a 2nd year WB major said so.
I'll personally deliver it at the Flyway Meetings in July & I'll load the tears of laughter that result to YouTube an post them here.

Seriously - do you have a career "plan B"?



dan, you started this. i simply stated my own opinion concerning calling a guy a poacher or not, you took it above and beyond. for fuck sakes, calm down. why are you getting so bent out of shape over this anyway?


Because we as hunters should be the No. 1 proponents of wildlife stewardship, and to hear a guy who says he wants to make Wildlife Biology his life's work argue for baiting wildfowl for the purpose of hunting is easily the dumbest fucking thing I've heard in quite some time.

You want to make baiting legal so you can kill more ducks - fuck whatever the last 100 years of science and research have told us about how it will affect the population.

I don't give a shit that Reb baits and kills ducks - but it's utterly mind boggling that a guy studying WB with an expressed goal of working for a State wildlife agency would have the views you do.

And I didn't start it - you're the one that jumped to the defense of a poacher by trying to justify baiting.


i'm just arguing against you dude, i never stated i am either for or against baiting. you took my statement and ran with it, so i played devil's advocate. sorry you got bent out of shape.

once again, i simply don't think it's that big of a deal to get worked up over. my opinion is that if he did it, it was really poor judgement on his part, and that he broke the law. in the end, he put grain on the ground and shot some ducks that flew down to eat it. i consider that far different than a guy who shoots banded birds in a park with a pellet gun. i think everyone jumping up and calling him a poacher is a bit harsh, nobody knows what really went on yet. when the actual events are revealed, then you can call him a poacher, but i'll still think it's harsh.

personally, i think baiting is stupid, and i've never done it.

do i think some wildlife laws are really stupid-yes. even if i was hired at a state agency i wouldn't necessarily agree with everything they did. i think some laws are very archaic and don't really apply today, that's just my opinion. Montana has a law that says something along the lines of you can't have any electronic aid that enables you to coordinate in the field. the way the law is written, you could get a ticket for possession of a cell phone if they really wanted to get you. laws like that need to be repealed or rewritten with better context in my opinion.

sorry to piss you off dude, no hard feelings?


Weak.

I don't believe for one second that you were arguing on principle or to play the devils advocate.

Nevertheless, it's fine.

And for the record a "citation" (and I don't give a damn if it's for jaywalking, baiting or speeding) isn't an "innocent til proven guilty" scenario.
It's a "You got caught doing _____, here's your fine".

In this case, he was cited for hunting over bait. What's the term we use for killing animals illegally....let's see what Wiki calls it.

Violations of hunting laws and regulations concerning wildlife management, local or international wildlife conservation schemes constitute wildlife crimes that are typically punishable.[12][13] The following violations and offenses are considered acts of poaching:

Hunting, killing or collecting wildlife that is listed as endangered by IUCN and protected by law such as the Endangered Species Act, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 and international treaties such as CITES.[12]
Fishing and hunting without a license.[13][14]
Capturing wildlife outside of legal hours and outside the hunting season;[12][13] usually the breeding season is declared as the closed season during which wildlife is protected by law.
Prohibited use of machine guns, poison, explosives, snare traps, nets and pitfall traps.[12]

(Pay special attention to this part)


Prohibited use of baiting with food, decoys or recorded calls in order to increase chances for shooting wildlife.[12]






Hunting from a moving vehicle or aircraft.[12]
Canned hunting is a particularly inhumane type of poaching wildlife as it often involves illegal activities such as trapping, caging or drugging animals, or cutting their feet with razor blades.[12]
Shining deer with a spotlight at night to impair its natural defenses and thus facilitate an easy kill is considered animal abuse.[15] This hunting method is illegal in Virginia, Connecticut and Tennessee.[12]
Taking wildlife on land that is restricted, owned by or licensed to somebody else.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poaching
Cover your ears, Darlin'
User avatar
DeadEye_Dan
WFF Supporter
 
Posts: 7164
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:59 am
Location: The Zoo

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby (MT)Montanafowler » Sun Nov 24, 2013 10:32 pm

DeadEye_Dan wrote:
Weak.

I don't believe for one second that you were arguing on principle or to play the devils advocate.

Nevertheless, it's fine.

And for the record a "citation" (and I don't give a damn if it's for jaywalking, baiting or speeding) isn't an "innocent til proven guilty" scenario.
It's a "You got caught doing _____, here's your fine".



That's fine, don't believe it.

just because someone is cited doesn't mean they can't take it to court. simply because an officer writes a ticket does not mean that they're the judge, they only enforce the law as they interpret the situation. their ticket can be thrown out by a judge if sufficient evidence is provided to the contrary. i'll reserve judgement on the guy until his court appearance.

i think if an anti wanted to get someone in trouble, they could fairly easily bait a field to frame someone, then call the warden.
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:18 pm
huntall6 wrote:MT is right.



totally sig worthy!
User avatar
(MT)Montanafowler
 
Posts: 3707
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 4:19 pm

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby DeadEye_Dan » Sun Nov 24, 2013 10:53 pm

In which case, he'd be proving his innocence and he's going to be considered guilty until he can prove otherwise.
Cover your ears, Darlin'
User avatar
DeadEye_Dan
WFF Supporter
 
Posts: 7164
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:59 am
Location: The Zoo

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby (MT)Montanafowler » Sun Nov 24, 2013 10:59 pm

DeadEye_Dan wrote:In which case, he'd be proving his innocence and he's going to be considered guilty until he can prove otherwise.


true, but that's how it pretty much goes these days anyway.
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:18 pm
huntall6 wrote:MT is right.



totally sig worthy!
User avatar
(MT)Montanafowler
 
Posts: 3707
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 4:19 pm

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby Bootlipkiller » Sun Nov 24, 2013 11:03 pm

(MT)Montanafowler wrote:
DeadEye_Dan wrote:In which case, he'd be proving his innocence and he's going to be considered guilty until he can prove otherwise.


true, but that's how it pretty much goes these days anyway.


How was it in the old days old timer? :lol:
AKPirate wrote:The sins of Boot and Gaddy are causing the Cali drought and knowing they have no limits to their depravity... :mrgreen:
User avatar
Bootlipkiller
 
Posts: 14361
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 4:47 am
Location: you stay classy Sutter County... Im Ron Burgandy???

AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby Redbeard » Sun Nov 24, 2013 11:06 pm

When I write a ticket, they're guilty
gila-river wrote:Great, now the cops want to install dishwashers to. Just do your job Red and stop encroaching on our rights to replace appliances. That is not the responsibility of police.:lol:
User avatar
Redbeard
 
Posts: 20636
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 10:09 pm
Location: Humboldt County

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby rebelp74 » Sun Nov 24, 2013 11:09 pm

Redbeard wrote:When I write a ticket, they're guilty

stop resisting dammit
Reinstate TomKat

4-20MJ
User avatar
rebelp74
 
Posts: 12506
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:49 am
Location: nw louisiana

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby assateague » Mon Nov 25, 2013 12:52 am

DeadEye_Dan wrote:Hey guys - I guess we can go back to shooting lead, piss on bag limits, hen restrictions, and generally anything else that was put in place to help bird populations since clearly no evidence exists that suggests we shouldn't do those things now.



Wait....."go back to"?
User avatar
assateague
 
Posts: 23627
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:52 pm
Location: Eastern Shore, People's Republic of Maryland

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby DeadEye_Dan » Mon Nov 25, 2013 5:57 am

assateague wrote:
DeadEye_Dan wrote:Hey guys - I guess we can go back to shooting lead, piss on bag limits, hen restrictions, and generally anything else that was put in place to help bird populations since clearly no evidence exists that suggests we shouldn't do those things now.



Wait....."go back to"?


Yeah. If you thought it was hard to kill a Pintail now, just wait until the population really craters!!
Cover your ears, Darlin'
User avatar
DeadEye_Dan
WFF Supporter
 
Posts: 7164
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:59 am
Location: The Zoo

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby GadwallGetter530 » Mon Nov 25, 2013 6:06 am

I just read this thread and I'm loving it. It's dripping with Irony. 8-)
Who really runs the prison? The inmates or the guards?
User avatar
GadwallGetter530
 
Posts: 9758
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 6:58 am
Location: Jefferson Republic

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby Eric Haynes » Mon Nov 25, 2013 6:28 am

DeadEye_Dan wrote:
assateague wrote:
DeadEye_Dan wrote:Hey guys - I guess we can go back to shooting lead, piss on bag limits, hen restrictions, and generally anything else that was put in place to help bird populations since clearly no evidence exists that suggests we shouldn't do those things now.



Wait....."go back to"?


Yeah. If you thought it was hard to kill a Pintail now, just wait until the population really craters!!

Godd creates a bunch of new ones every year. Can't remember exactly who said such a statement....
Whoever appeals to the law against his fellow man is either a fool or a coward. Whoever cannot take care of himself without that law is both. For a wounded man shall say to his assailant, "If I live, I will kill you. If I die, you are forgiven." Such is the rule of honor.
User avatar
Eric Haynes
WFF Supporter
 
Posts: 8350
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 6:59 pm
Location: Ogdensburg, NY

AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby DeadEye_Dan » Mon Nov 25, 2013 6:32 am

Eric Haynes wrote:
DeadEye_Dan wrote:
assateague wrote:
DeadEye_Dan wrote:Hey guys - I guess we can go back to shooting lead, piss on bag limits, hen restrictions, and generally anything else that was put in place to help bird populations since clearly no evidence exists that suggests we shouldn't do those things now.



Wait....."go back to"?


Yeah. If you thought it was hard to kill a Pintail now, just wait until the population really craters!!

Godd creates a bunch of new ones every year. Can't remember exactly who said such a statement....


I did, but you already know that. What's your point?
Cover your ears, Darlin'
User avatar
DeadEye_Dan
WFF Supporter
 
Posts: 7164
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:59 am
Location: The Zoo

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby OGblackcloud » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:08 am

Redbeard wrote:When I write a ticket, they're guilty

:lol: Every time
User avatar
OGblackcloud
 
Posts: 637
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 8:33 am
Location: calif/minnesnowta

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby Mornin Beef » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:40 am

Feeding wildlife can lead to an increase in disease transmission especially if it is in a concentrated area. Seems counterintuitive but feeding wildlife can lead to malnutrition. just look at the wildlife at the wal mart bait pile, huge and obese but actually quite sick from malnutrition. Feeding wildlife also leads to changes in behavior. Due to the difficulty migration poses for species like waterfowl they develop mechanisms like philopatry that allow for efficient means of traveling long distances. Feeding wildlife can cause animals to abadoden proven methods that lead to migratory success lowering their fitness.
Carp
Mornin Beef
 
Posts: 5357
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 5:25 pm
Location: Erie Canal

Re: AAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Postby Redbeard » Mon Nov 25, 2013 1:25 pm

Mornin Beef wrote:Feeding wildlife can lead to an increase in disease transmission especially if it is in a concentrated area. Seems counterintuitive but feeding wildlife can lead to malnutrition. just look at the wildlife at the wal mart bait pile, huge and obese but actually quite sick from malnutrition. Feeding wildlife also leads to changes in behavior. Due to the difficulty migration poses for species like waterfowl they develop mechanisms like philopatry that allow for efficient means of traveling long distances. Feeding wildlife can cause animals to abadoden proven methods that lead to migratory success lowering their fitness.
check out the big brain on beef. You make excellent points buddy
gila-river wrote:Great, now the cops want to install dishwashers to. Just do your job Red and stop encroaching on our rights to replace appliances. That is not the responsibility of police.:lol:
User avatar
Redbeard
 
Posts: 20636
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 10:09 pm
Location: Humboldt County

PreviousNext

Return to The Blind

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 81 guests

cron