The Offical WFF BS Thread!

Place for general and off topic Waterfowl talk.

WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby Flightstopper » Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:55 am

assateague wrote:
Bufflehead wrote:
assateague wrote:Does it actually say you can"t take them by hand?

if you are floating beneath the surface(swimming). you have to be standing on solid ground or be above the water. layout boats are a grey area


I forgot about this part. Hell, in MD, there are only two locations where you are even allowed to hunt standing on the bottom. Everywhere else must (technically) be on shore or in a boat. Ridiculous, this state.


Maryland sounds like the definition of contradiction
AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
User avatar
Flightstopper
WFF Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 9754
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:46 pm
Location: Pflugerville, Tx

Re: WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby assateague » Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:58 am

Hunting while Standing on the Natural Bottom
This method of hunting was formerly termed "body-booting". Hunting while standing in water on the natural bottom is legal at a licensed blind site (see above) or in specified waters of the state. The specified waters of the state where hunting by this method is allowed are the Sea Duck Zone, the Offshore Waterfowl Hunting Zone (often referred to as the gunning rig zone) and the nontidal waters of the Potomac River. Rules for hunting while standing on the natural bottom are the same as hunting from an anchored boat.


While it may appear that there are a lot of places for this, it's not the case. Both the Sea Duck zones and Gunning Rig zones are generally located at least 800 yards from any shore. I'm sure you could find a place to stand on the bottom somewhere, but most likely your head would be 25' under water as well. Dumbasses. And standing in the non-tidal waters of the Potomac is a quick ticket to a drowning death. So basically, 95% (or more) of the waters and marshes that people hunt, you're not allowed to stand on the bottom and hunt.
User avatar
assateague
 
Posts: 23627
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:52 pm
Location: Eastern Shore, People's Republic of Maryland

Re: WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby assateague » Fri Jul 06, 2012 12:01 pm

Click here and play with this mess of a map to get a true taste. Here, people may license blind sites even on private land, if the owner doesn't register it before, I think, July 10th every year. A lot of people do it, but I can't help but think you're just asking for aggravation if you license a stretch of shoreline in someone's backyard and build a blind on it, especially if they just forgot to license it.

http://dnrweb.dnr.state.md.us/gis/blindsites/mapper/index.html
User avatar
assateague
 
Posts: 23627
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:52 pm
Location: Eastern Shore, People's Republic of Maryland

Re: WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby Goldfish » Fri Jul 06, 2012 12:03 pm

Why in the world do you still live in that state??
My absolute favorite time of the day is from just before dawn, until just after. Most folks will spend their entire lives in bed sleeping through that magical hour - Mean Gene
User avatar
Goldfish
 
Posts: 7009
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:33 am
Location: Up Nort Dontchaknow

Re: WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby assateague » Fri Jul 06, 2012 12:04 pm

And if you do, click on "Legend" in the toolbar, and tell me if you can see any difference whatsoever in "licensed properties" and "areas closed". DNR here is an effing joke.
User avatar
assateague
 
Posts: 23627
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:52 pm
Location: Eastern Shore, People's Republic of Maryland

Re: WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby assateague » Fri Jul 06, 2012 12:04 pm

Goldfish wrote:Why in the world do you still live in that state??


Apparently I'm some sort of masochist.
User avatar
assateague
 
Posts: 23627
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:52 pm
Location: Eastern Shore, People's Republic of Maryland

Re: WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby Bufflehead » Fri Jul 06, 2012 12:36 pm

assateague wrote:Click here and play with this mess of a map to get a true taste. Here, people may license blind sites even on private land, if the owner doesn't register it before, I think, July 10th every year. A lot of people do it, but I can't help but think you're just asking for aggravation if you license a stretch of shoreline in someone's backyard and build a blind on it, especially if they just forgot to license it.

http://dnrweb.dnr.state.md.us/gis/blindsites/mapper/index.html
other than on state/federal owned land, it's the same here. only land owners have no rights over a area. whoever has the blind licensed, has hunting rights for 500 yards in every direction. all blinds must be licensed and can't be within 500 yards of another. can't hunt from a boat/floating blind without a float blind permit and there are only 125 of them issued each year and most are renewed to the person that had it the year before.


someone said they inherited a tiny marsh island that my family has had blinds on since the early 1900's, no one else has ever hunted there. they thought if they filed a complaint with the game commission, i would have to move the blinds and they would be able to hunt. with approval of the game commission, i moved the blinds into the water. they will never legaly hunt there as long as i'm alive. if they would have went about it different i would have let them hunt when i wasn't there but they wanted to be dicks about it.
Bufflehead
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 8:43 pm

Re: WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby JGUN » Fri Jul 06, 2012 1:11 pm

Eating lunch at the Wienermobile cafe in the Henry Ford museum.

uploadfromtaptalk1341598611415.jpg
YOU MUST REGISTER TO VIEW THIS IMAGE.
User avatar
JGUN
 
Posts: 2093
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 6:39 am
Location: Traverse City, Michigan

Re: WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby duckkillerclyde » Fri Jul 06, 2012 1:39 pm

Flightstopper wrote:
duckkillerclyde wrote:
assateague wrote:Does it actually say you can"t take them by hand?


So, yes it says you can't take game birds, including waterfowl by hand.



all of that being said, the duck commander admits that his first duck was with a sling shot and a sling shot is NOT an approved method of taking game birds in ANY state. Phil Robertson is the same as Jeff Foiles in my book.


So you lump a young poor coonass Phil that most likely shot the duck just to eat with a scoundrel like Foiles?


I put law breakers with law breakers.

They both broke the law for personal gain.
duckkillerclyde
 
Posts: 904
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 11:16 am

Re: WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby DC727 » Fri Jul 06, 2012 1:47 pm

duckkillerclyde wrote:
Flightstopper wrote:
duckkillerclyde wrote:
assateague wrote:Does it actually say you can"t take them by hand?


So, yes it says you can't take game birds, including waterfowl by hand.



all of that being said, the duck commander admits that his first duck was with a sling shot and a sling shot is NOT an approved method of taking game birds in ANY state. Phil Robertson is the same as Jeff Foiles in my book.


So you lump a young poor coonass Phil that most likely shot the duck just to eat with a scoundrel like Foiles?


I put law breakers with law breakers.

They both broke the law for personal gain.


No, Phil did not. Phil did it to eat, to survive. It was hell of a lot longer ago than Foiles, also.
NuffDaddy wrote:Nigga ran that back like he had my VCR
User avatar
DC727
 
Posts: 3575
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 8:01 am
Location: SouthCak

Re: WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby grizz18 » Fri Jul 06, 2012 1:49 pm

If you were a little less douchey, it would be a lot easier to ignore.
User avatar
grizz18
 
Posts: 1032
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 7:32 am

Re: WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby assateague » Fri Jul 06, 2012 1:50 pm

duckkillerclyde wrote:
Flightstopper wrote:
duckkillerclyde wrote:
assateague wrote:Does it actually say you can"t take them by hand?


So, yes it says you can't take game birds, including waterfowl by hand.



all of that being said, the duck commander admits that his first duck was with a sling shot and a sling shot is NOT an approved method of taking game birds in ANY state. Phil Robertson is the same as Jeff Foiles in my book.


So you lump a young poor coonass Phil that most likely shot the duck just to eat with a scoundrel like Foiles?


I put law breakers with law breakers.

They both broke the law for personal gain.



I vote you get to take HNTFSHs role here on WFF! :lol:
User avatar
assateague
 
Posts: 23627
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:52 pm
Location: Eastern Shore, People's Republic of Maryland

Re: WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby assateague » Fri Jul 06, 2012 1:50 pm

Bufflehead wrote:
assateague wrote:Click here and play with this mess of a map to get a true taste. Here, people may license blind sites even on private land, if the owner doesn't register it before, I think, July 10th every year. A lot of people do it, but I can't help but think you're just asking for aggravation if you license a stretch of shoreline in someone's backyard and build a blind on it, especially if they just forgot to license it.

http://dnrweb.dnr.state.md.us/gis/blindsites/mapper/index.html
other than on state/federal owned land, it's the same here. only land owners have no rights over a area. whoever has the blind licensed, has hunting rights for 500 yards in every direction. all blinds must be licensed and can't be within 500 yards of another. can't hunt from a boat/floating blind without a float blind permit and there are only 125 of them issued each year and most are renewed to the person that had it the year before.


someone said they inherited a tiny marsh island that my family has had blinds on since the early 1900's, no one else has ever hunted there. they thought if they filed a complaint with the game commission, i would have to move the blinds and they would be able to hunt. with approval of the game commission, i moved the blinds into the water. they will never legaly hunt there as long as i'm alive. if they would have went about it different i would have let them hunt when i wasn't there but they wanted to be dicks about it.



I love it when rules work against the asshats of the world. It makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside.
User avatar
assateague
 
Posts: 23627
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:52 pm
Location: Eastern Shore, People's Republic of Maryland

Re: WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby Bufflehead » Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:00 pm

assateague wrote:I love it when rules work against the asshats of the world. It makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside.

me too


it's nice that they have a online map of licensed locations up there. here, you have to go to the game commission office to view the blind location maps. they have it on a google maps account as well as old school maps, seems like it shouldn't be to hard to make a public map online like the one you linked to
Bufflehead
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 8:43 pm

WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby Flightstopper » Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:00 pm

duckkillerclyde wrote:
Flightstopper wrote:
duckkillerclyde wrote:
assateague wrote:Does it actually say you can"t take them by hand?


So, yes it says you can't take game birds, including waterfowl by hand.



all of that being said, the duck commander admits that his first duck was with a sling shot and a sling shot is NOT an approved method of taking game birds in ANY state. Phil Robertson is the same as Jeff Foiles in my book.


So you lump a young poor coonass Phil that most likely shot the duck just to eat with a scoundrel like Foiles?


I put law breakers with law breakers.

They both broke the law for personal gain.


Must be hell inside that head of yours
AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
User avatar
Flightstopper
WFF Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 9754
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:46 pm
Location: Pflugerville, Tx

Re: WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby duckkillerclyde » Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:02 pm

duckcommander727 wrote:
duckkillerclyde wrote:
Flightstopper wrote:
duckkillerclyde wrote:
assateague wrote:Does it actually say you can"t take them by hand?


So, yes it says you can't take game birds, including waterfowl by hand.



all of that being said, the duck commander admits that his first duck was with a sling shot and a sling shot is NOT an approved method of taking game birds in ANY state. Phil Robertson is the same as Jeff Foiles in my book.


So you lump a young poor coonass Phil that most likely shot the duck just to eat with a scoundrel like Foiles?


I put law breakers with law breakers.

They both broke the law for personal gain.


No, Phil did not. Phil did it to eat, to survive. It was hell of a lot longer ago than Foiles, also.


no matter when he did it, it was still illegal.

phil did it to survive which is personal gain. :thumbsup:
duckkillerclyde
 
Posts: 904
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 11:16 am

Re: WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby Bufflehead » Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:03 pm

you ever broken a law?
Bufflehead
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 8:43 pm

Re: WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby duckkillerclyde » Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:06 pm

phil also admits to
shooting waaaaaaaaay too many ducks
.

This was of course after he had left his wife and kids to fend for themselves when he was out drinking and abusing drugs and committing adultery.

It explains all of this in the movie. A fistful of ducks. Phil is the one who explains it.
duckkillerclyde
 
Posts: 904
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 11:16 am

Re: WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby duckkillerclyde » Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:06 pm

Bufflehead wrote:you ever broken a law?



Yes.
duckkillerclyde
 
Posts: 904
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 11:16 am

Re: WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby duckkillerclyde » Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:09 pm

Bufflehead wrote:you ever broken a law?



Have you ever broken a law?
duckkillerclyde
 
Posts: 904
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 11:16 am

Re: WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby Olly » Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:15 pm

duckkillerclyde wrote:
Bufflehead wrote:you ever broken a law?



Have you ever broken a law?


Buffie it's a trap.

Sent from your honey hole.
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.” ― Samuel Adams
User avatar
Olly
WFF Administrator
 
Posts: 15522
Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 9:05 am

Re: WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby Bufflehead » Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:16 pm

duckkillerclyde wrote:
Bufflehead wrote:you ever broken a law?



Have you ever broken a law?
more than once
Bufflehead
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 8:43 pm

WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby Flightstopper » Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:18 pm

View must be great from that self righteous high horse
AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
User avatar
Flightstopper
WFF Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 9754
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:46 pm
Location: Pflugerville, Tx

Re: WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby Bufflehead » Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:21 pm

Flightstopper wrote:View must be great from that self righteous high horse
he's just trolling
Bufflehead
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 8:43 pm

Re: WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby capt1972 » Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:22 pm

Flightstopper wrote:View must be great from that self righteous high horse

I think I can see my house from here.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

The Tree of Liberty Must be Refreshed From Time to Time With the BLOOD OF TYRANTS
User avatar
capt1972
WFF Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 5582
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2012 6:33 pm
Location: Where the ducks arnt

Re: WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby assateague » Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:25 pm

User avatar
assateague
 
Posts: 23627
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:52 pm
Location: Eastern Shore, People's Republic of Maryland

WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby Flightstopper » Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:25 pm

Bufflehead wrote:
Flightstopper wrote:View must be great from that self righteous high horse
he's just trolling


Me too, bored as hell
AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
User avatar
Flightstopper
WFF Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 9754
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:46 pm
Location: Pflugerville, Tx

Re: WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby Bufflehead » Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:30 pm

Flightstopper wrote:
Bufflehead wrote:
Flightstopper wrote:View must be great from that self righteous high horse
he's just trolling


Me too, bored as hell

clyde didn't stick around long, must be trying a screen shot of phil with a slingshot and a duck
Bufflehead
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 8:43 pm

Re: WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby Goldfish » Fri Jul 06, 2012 3:09 pm

I want to try and get a duck with a slingshot. It'd be quite the challenge I'd think.


Besides, it's just one big BB instead of a bunch of little BBs. What's the difference? You are shooting the same projectile.
My absolute favorite time of the day is from just before dawn, until just after. Most folks will spend their entire lives in bed sleeping through that magical hour - Mean Gene
User avatar
Goldfish
 
Posts: 7009
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:33 am
Location: Up Nort Dontchaknow

Re: WFF almost has 250 posts

Postby duckkillerclyde » Fri Jul 06, 2012 3:31 pm

Bufflehead wrote:
Flightstopper wrote:
Bufflehead wrote:
Flightstopper wrote:View must be great from that self righteous high horse
he's just trolling


Me too, bored as hell

clyde didn't stick around long, must be trying a screen shot of phil with a slingshot and a duck


no. pressure washing my house.
duckkillerclyde
 
Posts: 904
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 11:16 am

PreviousNext

Return to The Blind

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 265 guests