NuffDaddy wrote:I'm done with this thread too.
Sorry for getting worked up about this guys. I hope there are no hard feelings. I understand what you all are saying and it makes sense. I just feel there needs to be some regulation in this world to keep the assholes from screwing it up for everyone else. I wish it didn't have to be that way, but most people are selfish and don't give a fuck about the people they screw over.
Sorry again guys.
rebelp74 wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:I'm done with this thread too.
Sorry for getting worked up about this guys. I hope there are no hard feelings. I understand what you all are saying and it makes sense. I just feel there needs to be some regulation in this world to keep the assholes from screwing it up for everyone else. I wish it didn't have to be that way, but most people are selfish and don't give a fuck about the people they screw over.
Sorry again guys.
![]()
Bout time you quit being so shellfish.
NuffDaddy wrote:rebelp74 wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:I'm done with this thread too.
Sorry for getting worked up about this guys. I hope there are no hard feelings. I understand what you all are saying and it makes sense. I just feel there needs to be some regulation in this world to keep the assholes from screwing it up for everyone else. I wish it didn't have to be that way, but most people are selfish and don't give a fuck about the people they screw over.
Sorry again guys.
![]()
Bout time you quit being so shellfish.
Dick. I'm trying to apologize here.
And you spelled selfish wrong.
NuffDaddy wrote:3legged_lab wrote:Nuffy, brother, you can't win. You couldn't win with a solid argument, much less the weak one you are throwing down. Jim argues better than a woman, even if he was wrong, he'd still make you think he was right...
I know...but no one has a solid argument here. Assa posted himself a while back, if I'm remembering right, that he doesn't like to hunt where he can hear other people shoot. How can he argue anything other than his "principal" without hunting the places I'm talking about.
assateague wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:3legged_lab wrote:Nuffy, brother, you can't win. You couldn't win with a solid argument, much less the weak one you are throwing down. Jim argues better than a woman, even if he was wrong, he'd still make you think he was right...
I know...but no one has a solid argument here. Assa posted himself a while back, if I'm remembering right, that he doesn't like to hunt where he can hear other people shoot. How can he argue anything other than his "principal" without hunting the places I'm talking about.
You're not remembering right at all. I never said such a thing- matter of fact, I've said the exact opposite, many times. I hate it when I'm the only one in the marsh, because there's nothing to keep the birds up and moving if they've found a loafing spot. Same as dove hunting a field, I prefer a marsh loaded with hunters, to keep the ducks moving around.
ever have 100 mallards fly over and chuckle at you? I respond quick with a hail call. Many time the whole flock will slam on breaks, line up and come into the hole...it's a beautiful thing until a guy nearby skybusts ONE of your swing ducks, fucks up the whole train, and can't find his duck.assateague wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:3legged_lab wrote:Nuffy, brother, you can't win. You couldn't win with a solid argument, much less the weak one you are throwing down. Jim argues better than a woman, even if he was wrong, he'd still make you think he was right...
I know...but no one has a solid argument here. Assa posted himself a while back, if I'm remembering right, that he doesn't like to hunt where he can hear other people shoot. How can he argue anything other than his "principal" without hunting the places I'm talking about.
You're not remembering right at all. I never said such a thing- matter of fact, I've said the exact opposite, many times. I hate it when I'm the only one in the marsh, because there's nothing to keep the birds up and moving if they've found a loafing spot. Same as dove hunting a field, I prefer a marsh loaded with hunters, to keep the ducks moving around.
huntall6 wrote:and didnt FF post the regs that state a lost bird does count toward you limit? or was that just here in illannoy?
rebelp74 wrote:Yeah I have a yacht, suck it bitches!
aunt betty wrote:ever have 100 mallards fly over and chuckle at you? I respond quick with a hail call. Many time the whole flock will slam on breaks, line up and come into the hole...it's a beautiful thing until a guy nearby skybusts ONE of your swing ducks, fucks up the whole train, and can't find his duck.assateague wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:3legged_lab wrote:Nuffy, brother, you can't win. You couldn't win with a solid argument, much less the weak one you are throwing down. Jim argues better than a woman, even if he was wrong, he'd still make you think he was right...
I know...but no one has a solid argument here. Assa posted himself a while back, if I'm remembering right, that he doesn't like to hunt where he can hear other people shoot. How can he argue anything other than his "principal" without hunting the places I'm talking about.
You're not remembering right at all. I never said such a thing- matter of fact, I've said the exact opposite, many times. I hate it when I'm the only one in the marsh, because there's nothing to keep the birds up and moving if they've found a loafing spot. Same as dove hunting a field, I prefer a marsh loaded with hunters, to keep the ducks moving around.
Not cool.
assateague wrote:I think it should be 6 shells. Because if you wait for perfect shots, there are never cripples. That only happens when you have a backpack with 90 shells, and skybust. 6 shells is plenty.
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
3legged_lab wrote:assateague wrote:I think it should be 6 shells. Because if you wait for perfect shots, there are never cripples. That only happens when you have a backpack with 90 shells, and skybust. 6 shells is plenty.
The rule says your gun may only hold 3 shells, but it doesn't say anything at all about how many guns holding 3 shells each you may possess.
assateague wrote:And there should be a 1 gun limit. Because it's important certain people are happy.
(Nuff, I'm just busting balls)
NuffDaddy wrote:3legged_lab wrote:assateague wrote:I think it should be 6 shells. Because if you wait for perfect shots, there are never cripples. That only happens when you have a backpack with 90 shells, and skybust. 6 shells is plenty.
The rule says your gun may only hold 3 shells, but it doesn't say anything at all about how many guns holding 3 shells each you may possess.
We can't here.
Bullet #4
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
3legged_lab wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:3legged_lab wrote:assateague wrote:I think it should be 6 shells. Because if you wait for perfect shots, there are never cripples. That only happens when you have a backpack with 90 shells, and skybust. 6 shells is plenty.
The rule says your gun may only hold 3 shells, but it doesn't say anything at all about how many guns holding 3 shells each you may possess.
We can't here.
Bullet #4
I really don't think it gives any type of edge
3legged_lab wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:3legged_lab wrote:assateague wrote:I think it should be 6 shells. Because if you wait for perfect shots, there are never cripples. That only happens when you have a backpack with 90 shells, and skybust. 6 shells is plenty.
The rule says your gun may only hold 3 shells, but it doesn't say anything at all about how many guns holding 3 shells each you may possess.
We can't here.
Bullet #4
I really don't think it gives any type of edge
NuffDaddy wrote:3legged_lab wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:3legged_lab wrote:assateague wrote:I think it should be 6 shells. Because if you wait for perfect shots, there are never cripples. That only happens when you have a backpack with 90 shells, and skybust. 6 shells is plenty.
The rule says your gun may only hold 3 shells, but it doesn't say anything at all about how many guns holding 3 shells each you may possess.
We can't here.
Bullet #4
I really don't think it gives any type of edge
Quick cripple kills is all I could see it helping.
3legged_lab wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:3legged_lab wrote:assateague wrote:I think it should be 6 shells. Because if you wait for perfect shots, there are never cripples. That only happens when you have a backpack with 90 shells, and skybust. 6 shells is plenty.
The rule says your gun may only hold 3 shells, but it doesn't say anything at all about how many guns holding 3 shells each you may possess.
We can't here.
Bullet #4
I really don't think it gives any type of edge
assateague wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:3legged_lab wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:3legged_lab wrote:[quote="assateague"]I think it should be 6 shells. Because if you wait for perfect shots, there are never cripples. That only happens when you have a backpack with 90 shells, and skybust. 6 shells is plenty.
The rule says your gun may only hold 3 shells, but it doesn't say anything at all about how many guns holding 3 shells each you may possess.
We can't here.
Bullet #4
I really don't think it gives any type of edge
Quick cripple kills is all I could see it helping.
NuffDaddy wrote:I'm a bad shot...I get cripples.
Eric Haynes wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:I'm a bad shot...I get cripples.
You should only bring 6 shells with you than. That would make you get even less cripples.
huntall6 wrote:MT is right.
aunt betty wrote:You still haven't gotten to shot size restrictions.
15 shells and they must be #2 or smaller.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 182 guests