Considering a .35?

Place for general and off topic Waterfowl talk.

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby Flightstopper » Sat Oct 19, 2013 1:29 pm

assateague wrote:That's why I like the neck- miss or dead.


Agreed, done the same ever since.
AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
User avatar
Flightstopper
WFF Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 9754
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:46 pm
Location: Pflugerville, Tx

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby Tomkat » Sat Oct 19, 2013 1:58 pm

I aim for the heart. The majority of them bang flop if you hit them. I have had a few run 10-20 yards before they pile up.

I am not as big on the neck shot. I had one I knocked down like that get up and run away.

The quartering away is a great angle to take out all the important organs.

The head shot is a fools errand.



Blog- http://www.ksducks.com
User avatar
Tomkat
 
Posts: 6869
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 1:46 pm

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby assateague » Sat Oct 19, 2013 2:15 pm

I've shot around 500-600 deer. The only ones that I reliably get a flop from are neck shot or chest shot with the .35 only. Not saying it doesn't happen, just hasn't been the case for me. I've blown hearts completely out with a .30-06, and had to track them for 150 yards. And I've had them drop. Guess it depends on the type of bullet, also.

That being said, I've killed deer with a .22LR, .22-250, .243, .25-06, 7mm, .30-06, .30-30, .35, and a .45/70. The .35 is only one that reliably drops them where they stand for me (probably 90%), and within 20 yards (100%). I've never ever had to track an animal with that gun, so it's my favorite. I know you CAN get the flop with pretty much any caliber, but you DO get it with .35. That's all I'm saying.

And I still get excited every time :lol:
User avatar
assateague
 
Posts: 23627
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:52 pm
Location: Eastern Shore, People's Republic of Maryland

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby rebelp74 » Sat Oct 19, 2013 3:35 pm

Tomkat wrote:I aim for the heart. The majority of them bang flop if you hit them. I have had a few run 10-20 yards before they pile up.

I am not as big on the neck shot. I had one I knocked down like that get up and run away.

The quartering away is a great angle to take out all the important organs.

The head shot is a fools errand.



Blog- http://www.ksducks.com

The heed shot is money, ear hole that shit.
Reinstate TomKat

4-20MJ
User avatar
rebelp74
 
Posts: 12506
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:49 am
Location: nw louisiana

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby NuffDaddy » Sat Oct 19, 2013 4:00 pm

I go for the lungs. Lot bigger target, and you don't loose the neck meat.
User avatar
NuffDaddy
WFF Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 2:05 pm
Location: Saginaw Bay, Michigan

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby 3legged_lab » Sat Oct 19, 2013 5:40 pm

Out Texas friends go for the heart, via the butt.
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
User avatar
3legged_lab
WFF Supporter
 
Posts: 17344
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:19 pm
Location: OREGON

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby assateague » Sat Oct 19, 2013 5:56 pm

NuffDaddy wrote:I go for the lungs. Lot bigger target, and you don't loose the neck meat.


Anything over about 100, that's what I shoot for too.
User avatar
assateague
 
Posts: 23627
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:52 pm
Location: Eastern Shore, People's Republic of Maryland

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby DeadEye_Dan » Sat Oct 19, 2013 6:20 pm

Nice article on .35 caliber rounds in the new issue of American Rifleman
Cover your ears, Darlin'
User avatar
DeadEye_Dan
WFF Supporter
 
Posts: 7164
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:59 am
Location: The Zoo

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby Tomkat » Sat Oct 19, 2013 7:53 pm

Dan whats the writer like?
If I was gonna hunt the big woods like AT and others I would go with a 45/70 only because I have been around a few of them. My friend that killed his bear on our trip with a .35 Whelen swore by it.

I am looking forward to using my first ever 50 cal with my muzzle loader. I bet its brutal.



Blog- http://www.ksducks.com
User avatar
Tomkat
 
Posts: 6869
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 1:46 pm

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby assateague » Sat Oct 19, 2013 8:01 pm

I will say this about the ML- the brand of sabot you shoot makes a HUGE difference. I shot some TC and Powerbelt, was nothing. Shot my first Hornady and busted the bridge of my nose open. Felt like I added an extra 50 grains of powder.
User avatar
assateague
 
Posts: 23627
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:52 pm
Location: Eastern Shore, People's Republic of Maryland

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby assateague » Sat Oct 19, 2013 8:03 pm

Tomkat wrote:Dan whats the writer like?
If I was gonna hunt the big woods like AT and others I would go with a 45/70 only because I have been around a few of them. My friend that killed his bear on our trip with a .35 Whelen swore by it.

I am looking forward to using my first ever 50 cal with my muzzle loader. I bet its brutal.



Blog- http://www.ksducks.com


I've got nothing against the 45-70, either. The few deer I shot acted like it was .30-06, though. 2 dropped, but one ran almost 100 yards on his chest using only his hind legs. Couldn't believe it. And it was an ugly gun. Think it was a Henry, with that polished receiver and big ass octagonal barrel. Just not my cup of tea.
User avatar
assateague
 
Posts: 23627
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:52 pm
Location: Eastern Shore, People's Republic of Maryland

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby rebelp74 » Sat Oct 19, 2013 8:04 pm

assateague wrote:
Tomkat wrote:Dan whats the writer like?
If I was gonna hunt the big woods like AT and others I would go with a 45/70 only because I have been around a few of them. My friend that killed his bear on our trip with a .35 Whelen swore by it.

I am looking forward to using my first ever 50 cal with my muzzle loader. I bet its brutal.



Blog- http://www.ksducks.com


I've got nothing against the 45-70, either. The few deer I shot acted like it was .30-06, though. 2 dropped, but one ran almost 100 yards on his chest using only his hind legs. Couldn't believe it. And it was an ugly gun. Think it was a Henry, with that polished receiver and big ass octagonal barrel. Just not my cup of tea.

That doesn't sound like an ugly gun.
Reinstate TomKat

4-20MJ
User avatar
rebelp74
 
Posts: 12506
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:49 am
Location: nw louisiana

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby assateague » Sat Oct 19, 2013 8:05 pm

Eye of the beholder, and all that. I'm a simple guy- don't like all that "shine" shit.
User avatar
assateague
 
Posts: 23627
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:52 pm
Location: Eastern Shore, People's Republic of Maryland

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby NuffDaddy » Sun Oct 20, 2013 5:39 am

assateague wrote:
NuffDaddy wrote:I go for the lungs. Lot bigger target, and you don't loose the neck meat.


Anything over about 100, that's what I shoot for too.

With my .32 they almost never make it over 50 yards with a double lung shot. I love that little gun.
User avatar
NuffDaddy
WFF Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 2:05 pm
Location: Saginaw Bay, Michigan

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby Rick » Sun Oct 20, 2013 6:04 am

Tomkat wrote:I aim for the heart. The majority of them bang flop if you hit them. I have had a few run 10-20 yards before they pile up.


Every deer I recall just hitting in the heart has taken off like I hit it in the ass with a hotshot. Some only made it a 100yds, others a whole lot farther before piling up, and that can really suck in some of the places I have to recover them. For quick drops, make mine double lungers, and I won't mind sacrificing a shoulder for added insurance if the location suggests. Also a huge fan of Nosler ballistic tips as deer stoppers.
Rick
 
Posts: 12195
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 8:38 pm

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby NuffDaddy » Sun Oct 20, 2013 7:17 am

The problem with heart shots, is little to no tracking blood. With a hole in the lungs, they start spraying it out their nose in less than 10 yards.
User avatar
NuffDaddy
WFF Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 2:05 pm
Location: Saginaw Bay, Michigan

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby assateague » Sun Oct 20, 2013 2:04 pm

I assure you, with the .35 there is always blood.
User avatar
assateague
 
Posts: 23627
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:52 pm
Location: Eastern Shore, People's Republic of Maryland

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby bill herian » Sun Oct 20, 2013 3:26 pm

Looks like a good brush gun. Where I hunt, shots are seldom more than 80 yards but all the aspen whips and tag alder make it some tight shooting. Looks like a bullet that won't be thrown by an unseen twig or two.
User avatar
bill herian
 
Posts: 2375
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:28 am
Location: The Takagura Dojo

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby assateague » Sun Oct 20, 2013 4:55 pm

I've shot a deer through a cedar tree with it before.
User avatar
assateague
 
Posts: 23627
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:52 pm
Location: Eastern Shore, People's Republic of Maryland

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby jehler » Sun Oct 20, 2013 7:31 pm

32 Winchester is a better round
FREE THE QUOTE STREAM!
User avatar
jehler
 
Posts: 11453
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:18 pm

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby NuffDaddy » Sun Oct 20, 2013 7:44 pm

jehler wrote:32 Winchester is a better round

That's what I use. Seems to do some good damage. Shoots pretty flat to 150+ yards too.
User avatar
NuffDaddy
WFF Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 2:05 pm
Location: Saginaw Bay, Michigan

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby bill herian » Sun Oct 20, 2013 9:15 pm

assateague wrote:I've shot a deer through a cedar tree with it before.


It's illegal to attempt to take cedar trees with a centerfire rifle in Maryland.
User avatar
bill herian
 
Posts: 2375
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:28 am
Location: The Takagura Dojo

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby possumfoot » Sun Oct 20, 2013 10:31 pm

300 win mag.. most never even flip.. just drop like a sack of taters.. 200gr sierra BTHP match..

exit is about the size of my fist.. insides look like they spent time in a blender. it will rupture the heart even if ya dont hit it..

only ever had one move.. big buck that was chasing a doe.. perfect hit, but he some how managed to run.. though i had missed him because he ran.. then it occured to me that the big floating cloud was hair.. he made it MAYBE 100 yards.. looked like someone had dumped a paint can the whole way.. since then, i shoot a little higher on a big buck.. and a lil forward.. hard to run with no lungs, a blown open heart, and two totally busted shoulders.
Redbeard wrote:It's sad that a family can be torn apart by something as simple as a pack of wild dogs.
User avatar
possumfoot
 
Posts: 120
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:06 pm

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby waterfowlman » Sun Oct 20, 2013 10:39 pm

bill herian wrote:
assateague wrote:I've shot a deer through a cedar tree with it before.


It's illegal to attempt to take cedar trees with a centerfire rifle in Maryland.


:lol: :lol: :lol:
You're probably correct.
"Duty - Honor - Country".
User avatar
waterfowlman
 
Posts: 2250
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 6:12 pm
Location: Eastern Shore of Virginia

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby Tomkat » Sun Oct 20, 2013 10:42 pm

NuffDaddy wrote:The problem with heart shots, is little to no tracking blood. With a hole in the lungs, they start spraying it out their nose in less than 10 yards.


I don't need to trail them, they go night night.

I know people have runners on heart shots. I have had good results doing it this way. Hydrostatic shock perhaps?



Blog- http://www.ksducks.com
User avatar
Tomkat
 
Posts: 6869
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 1:46 pm

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby Rick » Mon Oct 21, 2013 5:53 am

NuffDaddy wrote:The problem with heart shots...


One that hasn't been mentioned is that it spoils the very best tasting part of the animal.
Rick
 
Posts: 12195
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 8:38 pm

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby Flightstopper » Mon Oct 21, 2013 6:32 am

Rick wrote:
NuffDaddy wrote:The problem with heart shots...


One that hasn't been mentioned is that it spoils the very best tasting part of the animal.


Even though it's not much meat, it jellies the front quarters as well.
AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
User avatar
Flightstopper
WFF Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 9754
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:46 pm
Location: Pflugerville, Tx

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby Tomkat » Mon Oct 21, 2013 6:47 am

Bang flop!

Heart shot has been a winner for me. I have done it with a 120 grn SP bullet from a .270 and a 150 grn SP bullet from a .30-06 on several occasions. I don't eat the heart and never noticed meat damage.

I just go over to my dead deer and get to work.



Blog- http://www.ksducks.com
User avatar
Tomkat
 
Posts: 6869
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 1:46 pm

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby Rick » Mon Oct 21, 2013 7:04 am

Now I'm going to tell on myself, as this thread haunted me yesterday evening. This heartshot:
Image

old gal didn't go "flop" but ran like a scalded-assed cat until a quick follow-up broke her back - and wiped out the lower portion of both backstaps and tenderloins in the process:
Image

Yes, yes, I should have had more confidence in my first double-lung-intended shot, or simply done a better job of putting it where I wanted it. But I didn't. And truth be told, it wasn't the first time a followed-up heart shot cost me backstraps.

So I say again, fuck heart shots.

(TK would have been proud of me yesterday morning, though, when I ran across a pasture after a sick coyote and plugged him on the run with a .357.)
Rick
 
Posts: 12195
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 8:38 pm

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby waterfowlman » Mon Oct 21, 2013 7:08 am

Your little hunting buddy looks pretty happy there Rick.
"Duty - Honor - Country".
User avatar
waterfowlman
 
Posts: 2250
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 6:12 pm
Location: Eastern Shore of Virginia

PreviousNext

Return to The Blind

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 84 guests