Kids today

[Feelin' Fowl]

Riding horses.


And that still doesn't explain away the biology, unless you're saying that we were designed to die at 40. Which I may be inclined to believe, some mornings.

yep, extensive horseback riding.

yes, i am saying we were designed to die far earlier in life than we do now. the biology will always be there, but if we live so much longer, does it benefit us to pop out kids at 14?

My guess would be that women are physically healthier from 14-28 than they are from 30-44. This would lead me to believe that breeding at a younger age is a huge benefit to the women involved, strictly speaking about their health/body.

[assateague]

I just can't believe that. No way is a 14 year old more physically capable of delivering and raising a baby than a 20 year old. No way.

[aunt betty]

I just can't believe that. No way is a 14 year old more physically capable of delivering and raising a baby than a 20 year old. No way.

Opinions are like assholes, everyone has one, and they all stink.

16-Yr-old pussy is the best lay you can get. Phil Robertson was probably tappin Kay at 15.


When a doe presents herself in the woods, do bucks ask for birth certificates ? 50/50
You know, to be civilized...lol

[aunt betty]

Devil is in me today so...
AT...
The concept of marraige was invented by:
A) a female
Or
B) a male


Inquiring minds want to know your opinion on this.
Editorialize and explain plz.

[assateague]

The Church.

[Feelin' Fowl]

I just can't believe that. No way is a 14 year old more physically capable of delivering and raising a baby than a 20 year old. No way.

My thought is for the duration of the child as a child. Your prime is early, then the body starts breaking down. I would rather make/raise babies during the prime of my body. Sure at 20 she may be better for the birth part, but what about when baby 3 comes? What about when the child is 14?

[aunt betty]

The Church.

You failed.
A or B

You had a 50/50 chance and shot a skunk instead.
Eat it.

[aunt betty]

The answer is B. Its obvious that a man invented it.
Read up on it.
Historically married women were the property of the husband and had nearly no rights at all.
You blew an easy one.


Scource:wiki
Read it.

[vincentpa]

Bunch of prudes on this site.


Sent from my iPhone 5, which sucks my cojones. Don't buy one.

[assateague]

The answer is B. Its obvious that a man invented it.
Read up on it.
Historically married women were the property of the husband and had nearly no rights at all.
You blew an easy one.


Scource:wiki
Read it.

If it is property, why would you only want just one? Do you want only one dollar? Only one gun? Only one acre? Of course not. Nor would you want to have to go through a bunch of rigmarole. He didn't have to have a ceremony to own a cow, so why a woman? Because the Church made it that way. Don't always believe everything you read in Wikipedia. Sometimes you got to put your own thinking cap on.

[aunt betty]

The answer is B. Its obvious that a man invented it.
Read up on it.
Historically married women were the property of the husband and had nearly no rights at all.
You blew an easy one.


Scource:wiki
Read it.

If it is property, why would you only want just one? Do you want only one dollar? Only one gun? Only one acre? Of course not. Nor would you want to have to go through a bunch of rigmarole. He didn't have to have a ceremony to own a cow, so why a woman? Because the Church made it that way. Don't always believe everything you read in Wikipedia. Sometimes you got to put your own thinking cap on.

I am not sure but marriage existed long before AT's church and a man could have wives.
There are many churches. Can you believe that?
There is a pretty good chance that I am trying to let you do the thinking but you simply say "church".
Tell us all about it. I aint no clergyman. Which church invented marriage AT?
Mormon?

[assateague]

Doesn't matter. Show me a marriage that isn't performed by an official.

[aunt betty]

Doesn't matter. Show me a marriage that isn't performed by an official.

Your proof is weak.
Common Law Marriages...
Kind of like squatters.

[assateague]

And your proof is weak- Wikipedia? Really?


Maybe you should use this one next time:

http://www.gizoogle.net/

I Gizoogled "marriage", and this came up:

Marriage (also called matrimony or wedlock) be a hoodly or ritually recognized union or legal contract between spouses dat establishes muthafuckin rights n' obligations between them, between dem n' they children, n' between dem n' they in-laws.[1] Da definizzle of marriage varies accordin ta different cultures yo, but it is principally a institution up in which interpersonal relationshizzles, probably intimate n' sexual, is bigged up. Y'all KNOW dat shit, muthafucka! In some cultures, marriage is recommended or compulsory before pursuin any sensual seduction. When defined broadly, marriage is considered a cultural universal fo' realz. A broad definizzle of marriage includes dem dat is monogamous, polygamous, same-sex n' temporary.
Muthafuckas marry fo' nuff reasons, including: legal, hood, libidinal, wack, financial, spiritual, n' religious. Dum diddy-dum, here I come biaaatch! Who tha fuck they marry may be hyped up by socially determined rulez of incest, prescriptizzle marriage rulez, parental chizzle n' individual desire. In nuff partz of tha ghetto, marriages is arranged. Forced marriages is illegal up in some jurisdictions.[2]

From the Wikipizzle page:

http://www.gizoogle.net/xfer.php?link=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage&sa=U&ei=0xp0UvXNCYqQ7AbfpYDQCg&ved=0CB4QFjAA&usg=AFQjCNFSdI5nQAEWHtj_NUve9zY8_Jfcmg

[(MT)Montanafowler]

My guess would be that women are physically healthier from 14-28 than they are from 30-44. This would lead me to believe that breeding at a younger age is a huge benefit to the women involved, strictly speaking about their health/body.

I just can't believe that. No way is a 14 year old more physically capable of delivering and raising a baby than a 20 year old. No way.

My thought is for the duration of the child as a child. Your prime is early, then the body starts breaking down. I would rather make/raise babies during the prime of my body. Sure at 20 she may be better for the birth part, but what about when baby 3 comes? What about when the child is 14?

my guess is that those who gave birth at 14 were likely killed in the process, and if they survived, the baby didn't. Assa is probably right, the 20 year old would most likely have the highest capability. i would bet that back before 1900, the "best" birthing age was 17-23. you probably had high birth mortality from 14-17, and from 23 on.

FF, modern medicine has expanded the healthy range for women to have children. granted, they still have menopause in their 40's, but they are still able to have kids well into their 30's and early 40's. birth mortality is nearly nonexistent anymore.

also, back then the kids actually had responsibilities and were expected to act accordingly.

[(MT)Montanafowler]

I don't know about the 160. That seems awful heavy. I'd think more about 135-140.

with the amount of manual labor they did i'd imagine they were much better built than most men today. hell, look at the guys who fit in girl pants, they obviously have very little muscle mass.

[jehler]

Lmao, Idaho I love it when you talk yourself into being an expert on a subject

[jehler]

Been sitting in the truck for an hour while jr meanders around making sets, I have a feeling gonna have some early mornings and burn to much fuel this fall

[jehler]

He did just find a led mag lite under a bush that we lost two years ago though, we got that going for us

[aunt betty]

I know wiki is a weak source. However when compared to "AT said" ...

its gold.


I got a good beer buzz going on. Dont eff wif me ok Assizzle???

[(MT)Montanafowler]

Lmao, Idaho I love it when you talk yourself into being an expert on a subject

not an expert by any means. Just looking at it from a biological perspective.

[Bootlipkiller]

Lmao, Idaho I love it when you talk yourself into being an expert on a subject

not an expert by any means. Just looking at it from a biological perspective.

Your perspective is shit.


Sent from an undisclosed location on the river

[aunt betty]

Lmao, Idaho I love it when you talk yourself into being an expert on a subject

not an expert by any means. Just looking at it from a biological perspective.

Your perspective is shit.


Sent from an undisclosed location on the river

Jehler. You da main.

What is junior targeting? Dogs, Waterline? What?
I have a STACK of Fur-Fish-Game magazines with his name on them if he wants it.

[(MT)Montanafowler]

Your perspective is shit.

wow, way to be a dick.



care to elaborate at how i'm wrong?

[Bootlipkiller]

Your perspective is shit.

wow, way to be a dick.



care to elaborate at how i'm wrong?

No you're right I just like fucking with you, hahahahaha!

Serious Sally over here.


Sent from an undisclosed location on the river

[aunt betty]

Your perspective is shit.

wow, way to be a dick.



care to elaborate at how i'm wrong?

Dicks fuck pussies n assholes.
Being a dick is so cool.

[(MT)Montanafowler]

No you're right I just like fucking with you, hahahahaha!

Serious Sally over here.


Sent from an undisclosed location on the river

it's cool, just wondered where the fuck that came from

i'm a lot less serious in real life, seriously

[The Duck Hammer]

My guess would be that women are physically healthier from 14-28 than they are from 30-44. This would lead me to believe that breeding at a younger age is a huge benefit to the women involved, strictly speaking about their health/body.

I just can't believe that. No way is a 14 year old more physically capable of delivering and raising a baby than a 20 year old. No way.

My thought is for the duration of the child as a child. Your prime is early, then the body starts breaking down. I would rather make/raise babies during the prime of my body. Sure at 20 she may be better for the birth part, but what about when baby 3 comes? What about when the child is 14?

my guess is that those who gave birth at 14 were likely killed in the process, and if they survived, the baby didn't. Assa is probably right, the 20 year old would most likely have the highest capability. i would bet that back before 1900, the "best" birthing age was 17-23. you probably had high birth mortality from 14-17, and from 23 on.

FF, modern medicine has expanded the healthy range for women to have children. granted, they still have menopause in their 40's, but they are still able to have kids well into their 30's and early 40's. birth mortality is nearly nonexistent anymore.

also, back then the kids actually had responsibilities and were expected to act accordingly.

To add to this. At 14 what does the hip structure of a girl look like? I highly doubt that the majority of girls bone structure is not set up to handle childbirth. Which would cause extreme trouble during birth and potentially cause death.

[aunt betty]

My guess would be that women are physically healthier from 14-28 than they are from 30-44. This would lead me to believe that breeding at a younger age is a huge benefit to the women involved, strictly speaking about their health/body.

I just can't believe that. No way is a 14 year old more physically capable of delivering and raising a baby than a 20 year old. No way.

My thought is for the duration of the child as a child. Your prime is early, then the body starts breaking down. I would rather make/raise babies during the prime of my body. Sure at 20 she may be better for the birth part, but what about when baby 3 comes? What about when the child is 14?

my guess is that those who gave birth at 14 were likely killed in the process, and if they survived, the baby didn't. Assa is probably right, the 20 year old would most likely have the highest capability. i would bet that back before 1900, the "best" birthing age was 17-23. you probably had high birth mortality from 14-17, and from 23 on.

FF, modern medicine has expanded the healthy range for women to have children. granted, they still have menopause in their 40's, but they are still able to have kids well into their 30's and early 40's. birth mortality is nearly nonexistent anymore.

also, back then the kids actually had responsibilities and were expected to act accordingly.

To add to this. At 14 what does the hip structure of a girl look like? I highly doubt that the majority of girls bone structure is not set up to handle childbirth. Which would cause extreme trouble during birth and potentially cause death.

You a qualified physician? You should see the 14 year old black girls in my hood.
Red would always be wearing his bow tie halloween costume and pass out from extreme exhaustion.

[(MT)Montanafowler]

To add to this. At 14 what does the hip structure of a girl look like? I highly doubt that the majority of girls bone structure is not set up to handle childbirth. Which would cause extreme trouble during birth and potentially cause death.

pretty much where i was coming from. I don't know when the pubis, illium and ischium fuse in humans. the birth canal wouldn't necessarily be fully formed or the correct size at 14