Flightstopper wrote:Feelin' Fowl wrote:Flightstopper wrote:Redbeard wrote:Oh shit! Here we go again!
That's a tough one Doc. The stepdad's life was saved. But yes it is a free country.
Pops entering the building coulda put firefighters lives in danger trying to save him as well.
On the other hand, the news story the next morning would've read "last night local fire and police officials allowed a man to enter a home engulfed in flames. The man perished as fire personnel stood by and watched without making an attempt to save him. The local district attorney is filing charges against all fire and police official on scene. The case is currently under review."
I'm with Red on this one, by stopping the guy from entering the building they did exactly what they are trained to do. If they let the step dad in then decide they need to go rescue him as well then at least two firefighters have to enter the structure. With two more ready to go at the door if they go down. As hard as it is there is really no winning in a situation like this.
If they already decided they weren't going to enter for the kid, why would they suddenly need to enter because someone else ran in?
I'm not a cop, but I can't imagine that they are trained for situations like this. I'm sure that the LEO's can argue that other training they have recieved can be applied here, but I find it hard to believe that this situation is covered in the academy.
I don't like that the guy wasn't allowed to make an attempt to go in, but on the other hand, I believe that most law enforcement agencies use the motto "To protect and serve". If that's accurate, then I would say that the cop was protecting the dad, and you could make an argument that he was trained to do just that...
I'm not sure how to feel about this one. Prayers for the family involved, and thankful that it wasn't something that I was involved in from either side.
The situation changes when he enters. If it's bad enough they wont let firefighters in there is little chance the dad will make it more than a few steps in before he collapses from smoke inhalation, left to die or require rescuing.
So what? If I want to die, that's my business. Maybe the guy didn't want to live with that guilt. Who cares? Protect people from others, not themselves. I'm a firm believer in self-determination and social Darwinism. Quit throwing monkey wrenches into them both.
There's a Chinese proverb that says if you save a man's life, you are responsible for him. We like to think that they would owe you, but I'm with the Chinamen on this one. If he gets drunk 6 days a week because of the burden of guilt, repeatedly bears his wife in a drunken stupor, then kills 4 kids in a DUI crash after drinking all night, who'd they really help? Don't go saving someone's life that doesn't want to be saved unless you're ready to take responsibility for them forever.