Kids today

[flight control]

My guess would be that women are physically healthier from 14-28 than they are from 30-44. This would lead me to believe that breeding at a younger age is a huge benefit to the women involved, strictly speaking about their health/body.

I just can't believe that. No way is a 14 year old more physically capable of delivering and raising a baby than a 20 year old. No way.

My thought is for the duration of the child as a child. Your prime is early, then the body starts breaking down. I would rather make/raise babies during the prime of my body. Sure at 20 she may be better for the birth part, but what about when baby 3 comes? What about when the child is 14?

my guess is that those who gave birth at 14 were likely killed in the process, and if they survived, the baby didn't. Assa is probably right, the 20 year old would most likely have the highest capability. i would bet that back before 1900, the "best" birthing age was 17-23. you probably had high birth mortality from 14-17, and from 23 on.

FF, modern medicine has expanded the healthy range for women to have children. granted, they still have menopause in their 40's, but they are still able to have kids well into their 30's and early 40's. birth mortality is nearly nonexistent anymore.

also, back then the kids actually had responsibilities and were expected to act accordingly.

At 14 what does the hip structure of a girl look like?

Just make sure her father isn't looking when you investigate

[Feelin' Fowl]

A woman's body adjusts accordingly for child birth. That's how it works...

Without data from the 1800's this is all just opinion. Both sides.

[jehler]

I have experience with a 14 year old, no-pedo, I was 14 also, it is way smaller than a 40 year olds, I can say that with complete authority

[(MT)Montanafowler]

A woman's body adjusts accordingly for child birth. That's how it works...

Without data from the 1800's this is all just opinion. Both sides.

to an extent.

DH or I could probably find loads of information if we wanted to. i'm just not going to.


but on the other hand, i might use this as my project for vertebrate Anatomy.

[jehler]

My god are you all dopers?

[The Duck Hammer]

A woman's body adjusts accordingly for child birth. That's how it works...

Without data from the 1800's this is all just opinion. Both sides.

There is no way a 14 year olds hips are just going to kick out for childbirth and be fine. There is more to the hip structure than allowing a baby to pass through. If I'm not mistaken the hips have to already be in place to help distribute the babies weight as it develops.


Sent from my Vox Mortem

[(MT)Montanafowler]

A woman's body adjusts accordingly for child birth. That's how it works...

Without data from the 1800's this is all just opinion. Both sides.

There is no way a 14 year olds hips are just going to kick out for childbirth and be fine. There is more to the hip structure than allowing a baby to pass through. If I'm not mistaken the hips have to already be in place to help distribute the babies weight as it develops.


Sent from my Vox Mortem

not to mention hormones and other development. there is so much change that has to happen in a short period of time that it would no doubt lead to complications even today, and a death sentence in the 1800's for either the mother or child.

[rebelp74]

ugh hmmm.... WHO. GIVES. A. FUCK!

[Bootlipkiller]

ugh hmmm.... WHO. GIVES. A. FUCK!

Some people on this forum are in serious need of a blow job!

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1383351256.318589.jpg

Sent from an undisclosed location on the river

[Olly]

ugh hmmm.... WHO. GIVES. A. FUCK!

Trj2WwK.gif

[The Duck Hammer]

ugh hmmm.... WHO. GIVES. A. FUCK!

Trj2WwK.gif

Sent from my Vox Mortem

[rebelp74]

ugh hmmm.... WHO. GIVES. A. FUCK!

Trj2WwK.gif

[RonE]

ugh hmmm.... WHO. GIVES. A. FUCK!

Yeah!

[Tomkat]

I have experience with a 14 year old, no-pedo, I was 14 also, it is way smaller than a 40 year olds, I can say that with complete authority

I knew a 15 year old back in my younger days that felt like a warm soup.

[aunt betty]

I MUST EDUCATE THESE KIDS...
said in my eric cartmann voice.

Sorry, but yer all a bunch of dumassateagues.

[Laguna Madre]

Kids on a Marine Corps base standing at attention while taps is playing. We just need to train our own kids up right and pray for the best.

[vincentpa]

I have experience with a 14 year old, no-pedo, I was 14 also, it is way smaller than a 40 year olds, I can say that with complete authority

I knew a 15 year old back in my younger days that felt like a warm soup.

Is this when you made that trip to Bangkok a few years ago?

[Redbeard]

I don't know about the 160. That seems awful heavy. I'd think more about 135-140.

with the amount of manual labor they did i'd imagine like me, they were much better built than most men today. hell, look at the guys who fit in girl pants, they obviously have very little muscle mass.

FIFY


#tazincali

[Redbeard]

My guess would be that women are physically healthier from 14-28 than they are from 30-44. This would lead me to believe that breeding at a younger age is a huge benefit to the women involved, strictly speaking about their health/body.

I just can't believe that. No way is a 14 year old more physically capable of delivering and raising a baby than a 20 year old. No way.

My thought is for the duration of the child as a child. Your prime is early, then the body starts breaking down. I would rather make/raise babies during the prime of my body. Sure at 20 she may be better for the birth part, but what about when baby 3 comes? What about when the child is 14?

my guess is that those who gave birth at 14 were likely killed in the process, and if they survived, the baby didn't. Assa is probably right, the 20 year old would most likely have the highest capability. i would bet that back before 1900, the "best" birthing age was 17-23. you probably had high birth mortality from 14-17, and from 23 on.

FF, modern medicine has expanded the healthy range for women to have children. granted, they still have menopause in their 40's, but they are still able to have kids well into their 30's and early 40's. birth mortality is nearly nonexistent anymore.

also, back then the kids actually had responsibilities and were expected to act accordingly.

To add to this. At 14 what does the hip structure of a girl look like? I highly doubt that the majority of girls bone structure is not set up to handle childbirth. Which would cause extreme trouble during birth and potentially cause death.

what does a chickens hip structure like like at 8 weeks? They ready to shit them eggs out yet?


#tazincali

[Redbeard]

Lotta big brains in this thread. Too bad it's full of little dicks


#tazincali

[3geese4me]

Kids on a Marine Corps base standing at attention while taps is playing. We just need to train our own kids up right and pray for the best.

I live on an Air Force base and my son stands at attention when taps is playing and when the national anthem is playing as well.

[assateague]

Do they sound reveille and retreat on AF bases?

[3geese4me]

Absolutely, reveille is at 0700 and retreat is at 1900 everyday. National anthem plays at 1700 as well.

[assateague]

I figured it was a pretty stupid question, but I never spent any time on an AFB.

[The Duck Hammer]

My guess would be that women are physically healthier from 14-28 than they are from 30-44. This would lead me to believe that breeding at a younger age is a huge benefit to the women involved, strictly speaking about their health/body.

I just can't believe that. No way is a 14 year old more physically capable of delivering and raising a baby than a 20 year old. No way.

My thought is for the duration of the child as a child. Your prime is early, then the body starts breaking down. I would rather make/raise babies during the prime of my body. Sure at 20 she may be better for the birth part, but what about when baby 3 comes? What about when the child is 14?

my guess is that those who gave birth at 14 were likely killed in the process, and if they survived, the baby didn't. Assa is probably right, the 20 year old would most likely have the highest capability. i would bet that back before 1900, the "best" birthing age was 17-23. you probably had high birth mortality from 14-17, and from 23 on.

FF, modern medicine has expanded the healthy range for women to have children. granted, they still have menopause in their 40's, but they are still able to have kids well into their 30's and early 40's. birth mortality is nearly nonexistent anymore.

also, back then the kids actually had responsibilities and were expected to act accordingly.

To add to this. At 14 what does the hip structure of a girl look like? I highly doubt that the majority of girls bone structure is not set up to handle childbirth. Which would cause extreme trouble during birth and potentially cause death.

what does a chickens hip structure like like at 8 weeks? They ready to shit them eggs out yet?


#tazincali

No fuckin ideal. I take poultry anatomy next semester, so ask me again in May.

[3geese4me]

I figured it was a pretty stupid question, but I never spent any time on an AFB.

Meh it isn't a dumb question. Each of the services do things different on each base.

[Bulldog0156]

No fuckin ideal. I take poultry anatomy next semester, so ask me again in May.

License and registration, Chicken Fucker!

[rebelp74]

I have experience with a 14 year old, no-pedo, I was 14 also, it is way smaller than a 40 year olds, I can say that with complete authority

I knew a 15 year old back in my younger days that felt like a warm soup.

Is this when you made that trip to Bangkok a few years ago?

[aunt betty]

On the subject of 14-year-olds having babies.
Haven't you guys ever met a 28-yr-old grandmother, her 14-year-old daughter, and the grandbaby before?
I have met several families that fit this pattern.
Its genetic among welfare families.
GET THAT MONEY chica.

[The Duck Hammer]

On the subject of 14-year-olds having babies.
Haven't you guys ever met a 28-yr-old grandmother, her 14-year-old daughter, and the grandbaby before?
I have met several families that fit this pattern.
Its genetic among welfare families.
GET THAT MONEY chica.

I have met one that basically fit that situation. She had her first kid in the 7/8th grade, don't remember exactly, and less than 2 years later she was pregnant again with a different guys baby. She had absolutely no shame for what she was doing and couldn't handle raising, or even helping to raise, the first baby. People like that deserve no respect from society and when the media makes reality shows portraying that shit on TV that doesn't help the situation one damn bit.


Sent from my Vox Mortem