WaterfowlForum.Net

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 4:32 pm**

These 4 geese and walked right by me while I was fishing today. All 4 had bands! Couldn't get a good pic of the band's.

uploadfromtaptalk1367962302688.jpg

uploadfromtaptalk1367962320707.jpg

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 4:49 pm**

Happens to me all the time at this park near my house.

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 4:49 pm**

Very cool. Amazing how things like that happen isn't it.

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 4:52 pm**

Even the gosslings had bands?

sent from a phancy fone

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 4:58 pm**

Goldfish wrote:Even the gosslings had bands?

sent from a phancy fone

when both parents are banded 90% probability that the goslings are going to be banded as well unless the maternal lineage is of the lesser genus

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 5:00 pm**

jehler wrote:
Goldfish wrote:Even the gosslings had bands?

sent from a phancy fone
when both parents are banded 90% probability that the goslings are going to be banded as well unless the maternal lineage is of the lesser genus

Of course. I knew this too. Sleep deprevation and the flu takes it's toll.

sent from a phancy fone

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 5:02 pm**

Sleep deprivation is real, I went 3 weeks on like 5 hours of total sleep and damn near couldn't function. No, drugs were not involved.

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 5:05 pm**

jehler wrote:
Goldfish wrote:Even the gosslings had bands?

sent from a phancy fone
when both parents are banded 90% probability that the goslings are going to be banded as well unless the maternal lineage is of the lesser genus

What is the probability of one coming out collared?

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 5:06 pm**

The Duck Hammer wrote:
jehler wrote:
Goldfish wrote:Even the gosslings had bands?

sent from a phancy fone
when both parents are banded 90% probability that the goslings are going to be banded as well unless the maternal lineage is of the lesser genus

What is the probability of one coming out collared?

50%

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 5:06 pm**

Can any one say...........................Jeff Foiles???

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 5:06 pm**

rebelp74 wrote:
The Duck Hammer wrote:
jehler wrote:
Goldfish wrote:Even the gosslings had bands?

sent from a phancy fone
when both parents are banded 90% probability that the goslings are going to be banded as well unless the maternal lineage is of the lesser genus

What is the probability of one coming out collared?

50%

That was my assumption.

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 5:07 pm**

Tomkat wrote:Can any one say...........................Jeff Foiles???

Jeff Foiles

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 5:09 pm**

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 5:17 pm**

jehler wrote:
Goldfish wrote:Even the gosslings had bands?

sent from a phancy fone
when both parents are banded 90% probability that the goslings are going to be banded as well unless the maternal lineage is of the lesser genus

I never knew this

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 5:18 pm**

Redbeard wrote:
jehler wrote:
Goldfish wrote:Even the gosslings had bands?

sent from a phancy fone
when both parents are banded 90% probability that the goslings are going to be banded as well unless the maternal lineage is of the lesser genus
I never knew this

That surprises me as you're an expert in reproduction

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 5:39 pm**

jehler wrote:
Redbeard wrote:
jehler wrote:
Goldfish wrote:Even the gosslings had bands?

sent from a phancy fone
when both parents are banded 90% probability that the goslings are going to be banded as well unless the maternal lineage is of the lesser genus
I never knew this
That surprises me as you're an expert in reproduction

Ba-ding

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 5:56 pm**

The Duck Hammer wrote:
rebelp74 wrote:
The Duck Hammer wrote:
jehler wrote:
Goldfish wrote:Even the gosslings had bands?

sent from a phancy fone
when both parents are banded 90% probability that the goslings are going to be banded as well unless the maternal lineage is of the lesser genus

What is the probability of one coming out collared?

50%

That was my assumption.

Oh, it's more than an assumption. It's a scientific fact.

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 5:58 pm**

I thought it was a law now?

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 6:01 pm**

rebelp74 wrote:I thought it was a law now?

Laws are facts or are they?

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 6:02 pm**

Mornin Beef wrote:
rebelp74 wrote:I thought it was a law now?

Laws are facts or are they?

50/50 chance

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 6:07 pm**

Get over the whole band thing. They are aluminum things worth very little. Some else touched the goose or duck...big deal.

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 6:08 pm**

aunt betty wrote:Get over the whole band thing. They are aluminum things worth very little. Some else touched the goose or duck...big deal.

Don't sweat it, you'll get one someday.

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 6:08 pm**

rebelp74 wrote:
Mornin Beef wrote:
rebelp74 wrote:I thought it was a law now?

Laws are facts or are they?

50/50 chance

Science never proves anything either. It just helps us along. This AT 50/50 law fully binds our feet from making any sort of egress near impossible. Shame on your axiom AT.

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 6:10 pm**

Mornin Beef wrote:
rebelp74 wrote:
Mornin Beef wrote:
rebelp74 wrote:I thought it was a law now?

Laws are facts or are they?

50/50 chance

Science never proves anything either. It just helps us along. This AT 50/50 law fully binds our feet from making any sort of egress. Shame on your axiom AT.

Which has/will hurt science more, AT's 50/50 or the church?

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 6:23 pm**

3legged_lab wrote:
aunt betty wrote:Get over the whole band thing. They are aluminum things worth very little. Some else touched the goose or duck...big deal.

Don't sweat it, you'll get one someday.

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 6:41 pm**

Mornin Beef wrote:
rebelp74 wrote:
Mornin Beef wrote:
rebelp74 wrote:I thought it was a law now?

Laws are facts or are they?

50/50 chance

Science never proves anything either. It just helps us along. This AT 50/50 law fully binds our feet from making any sort of egress. Shame on your axiom AT.

50/50 chance you're right.

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 7:02 pm**

aunt betty wrote:Get over the whole band thing. They are aluminum things worth very little. Some else touched the goose or duck...big deal.

For me I'm happy just to get a duck or a goose. These just happen to be the only bands I've ever seen. To see 4 at once all together was pretty cool for me. I'm not hung up on bands.......yet

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 7:21 pm**

assateague wrote:
Mornin Beef wrote:
rebelp74 wrote:
Mornin Beef wrote:
rebelp74 wrote:I thought it was a law now?

Laws are facts or are they?

50/50 chance

Science never proves anything either. It just helps us along. This AT 50/50 law fully binds our feet from making any sort of egress. Shame on your axiom AT.

50/50 chance you're right.

I want to Quote this Headline: "AT finds best online mechanism for inline chat nothing-ness, a 50/50 law, Over 600 members posts are biting them in the ass allowing AT to say "I told you so." In a record rate.

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 7:24 pm**

Secret Government Internet Spy Scan wrote:AT finds best online mechanism for inline chat nothing-ness, a 50/50 law, Over 600 members posts are biting them in the ass allowing AT to say "I told you so. In a record rate.

Something like this?

Posted: **Tue May 07, 2013 7:42 pm**

rebelp74 wrote:
Secret Government Internet Spy Scan wrote:AT finds best online mechanism for inline chat nothing-ness, a 50/50 law, Over 600 members posts are biting them in the ass allowing AT to say "I told you so. In a record rate.

Something like this?

Geez Im flattered.

WaterfowlForum.Net

WTF?

WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?

Re: WTF?