huntfishnv wrote:The funny thing is, I bet they never try it on someone who even looks like they could fight back.
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
assateague wrote:I want to watch a video of them getting shot. REally, I do. That is precisely why it happens- because they know they're in no danger of a bullet to the skull, or even any simple trouble. And that's BS.
Olly wrote:And that ladies and gentlemen is why I am ALWAYS armed in public.
capt1972 wrote:but if you shot one after being assaulted you would be a racist for defending yourself.
Olly wrote:capt1972 wrote:but if you shot one after being assaulted you would be a racist for defending yourself.
Olly wrote:And that ladies and gentlemen is why I am ALWAYS armed in public.
AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
Tiler_J wrote:Olly wrote:And that ladies and gentlemen is why I am ALWAYS armed in public.
Forgive my ignorance, but what is being armed going to do for you in either of these three videos?
flight control wrote:Tiler_J wrote:Olly wrote:And that ladies and gentlemen is why I am ALWAYS armed in public.
Forgive my ignorance, but what is being armed going to do for you in either of these three videos?
When he regains conciousness, he's shooting the first person he sees.
Tiler_J wrote:Olly wrote:And that ladies and gentlemen is why I am ALWAYS armed in public.
Forgive my ignorance, but what is being armed going to do for you in either of these three videos?
Olly wrote:Tiler_J wrote:Olly wrote:And that ladies and gentlemen is why I am ALWAYS armed in public.
Forgive my ignorance, but what is being armed going to do for you in either of these three videos?
Obviously if anyone is taken by surprise then a gun in a holster will remain in it's holster. I was referring to the general shitbags out there that this this stuff is okay and having a firearm to defend myself IF I'm able to.
But you knew that.
Tiler_J wrote:Olly wrote:And that ladies and gentlemen is why I am ALWAYS armed in public.
Forgive my ignorance, but what is being armed going to do for you in either of these three videos?
assateague wrote:
I wasn't necessarily talking about them. I was talking to anyone else walking down the street who sees it- they should not only be allowed to shoot, they should be ENCOURAGED to shoot. Hell, give them a medal, not time in a holding cell and a huge legal bill. THAT is what will stop it- the fear of immediate, ugly, painful retribution. These type of fuckheads live 99% of their lives with zero fear of any meaningful consequence, which is why bullshit like this even exists.
And I'm sure flight is right- the whole "equal force" thing is fucking asinine. If a guy hits me with a fist, I should be more than allowed to shoot him right in the face. If he hits somebody who's walking in front of me, I should be allowed to shoot him. Equal force my ass.
assateague wrote:And people actually believe that crap. But hey, let them do what they want- I don't see the need for them to interfere with me protecting my stuff or my family, unless they're the ones breaking in.
assateague wrote:Tiler_J wrote:Olly wrote:And that ladies and gentlemen is why I am ALWAYS armed in public.
Forgive my ignorance, but what is being armed going to do for you in either of these three videos?
And I'm sure flight is right- the whole "equal force" thing is fucking asinine. If a guy hits me with a fist, I should be more than allowed to shoot him right in the face. If he hits somebody who's walking in front of me, I should be allowed to shoot him. Equal force my ass.
AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
Olly wrote:assateague wrote:
I wasn't necessarily talking about them. I was talking to anyone else walking down the street who sees it- they should not only be allowed to shoot, they should be ENCOURAGED to shoot. Hell, give them a medal, not time in a holding cell and a huge legal bill. THAT is what will stop it- the fear of immediate, ugly, painful retribution. These type of fuckheads live 99% of their lives with zero fear of any meaningful consequence, which is why bullshit like this even exists.
And I'm sure flight is right- the whole "equal force" thing is fucking asinine. If a guy hits me with a fist, I should be more than allowed to shoot him right in the face. If he hits somebody who's walking in front of me, I should be allowed to shoot him. Equal force my ass.
I had someone call me a psychopath one time because I said it should be justifiable to shoot someone breaking into your house at 2 am even if they aren't armed. Her argument was that I'm a big guy and I should be able to stop someone without a gun and because he didn't have a gun then he was only there to rob me and not murder me.
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
assateague wrote:Tiler_J wrote:Olly wrote:And that ladies and gentlemen is why I am ALWAYS armed in public.
Forgive my ignorance, but what is being armed going to do for you in either of these three videos?
I wasn't necessarily talking about them. I was talking to anyone else walking down the street who sees it- they should not only be allowed to shoot, they should be ENCOURAGED to shoot. Hell, give them a medal, not time in a holding cell and a huge legal bill. THAT is what will stop it- the fear of immediate, ugly, painful retribution. These type of fuckheads live 99% of their lives with zero fear of any meaningful consequence, which is why bullshit like this even exists.
And I'm sure flight is right- the whole "equal force" thing is fucking asinine. If a guy hits me with a fist, I should be more than allowed to shoot him right in the face. If he hits somebody who's walking in front of me, I should be allowed to shoot him. Equal force my ass.
Olly wrote: We're still the bastard pirates of the duck forum world.
I had someone call me a psychopath one time because I said it should be justifiable to shoot someone breaking into your house at 2 am even if they aren't armed. Her argument was that I'm a big guy and I should be able to stop someone without a gun and because he didn't have a gun then he was only there to rob me and not murder me.
The Mad Duck wrote:I had someone call me a psychopath one time because I said it should be justifiable to shoot someone breaking into your house at 2 am even if they aren't armed. Her argument was that I'm a big guy and I should be able to stop someone without a gun and because he didn't have a gun then he was only there to rob me and not murder me.
My concealed carry instructor told us.."If someone breaks into your house at 2am,armed or not,he aint there to borrow some pajamas. You are justified at that point to respond with deadly force."
Redbeard wrote:Buy not when. I hit that damne pole
Feelin' Fowl wrote:Big dick cakes are delicious!
Deltaman wrote:Chickenshet bastagesGang mentality..............always tougher when in numbers.
huntall6 wrote:MT is right.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 965 guests