WaterfowlForum.Net

Nashua Telegraph
November 18, 2013 6:53 PM
Companies love state-by-state lists based on their sales data because it produces easy publicity — you know, “The best places to live in America,” “Which cities love ketchup more than mustard?” and that kind of thing – but chances are that few will draw as much attention in the Granite State as one from Condomania, a Web site that sells condoms.

In a survey released Monday, it claims that based on the sizes of condoms bought through its Web site, New Hampshire has the biggest male genitalia of any state in the country. Massachusetts is No. 8, Vermont is No. 29 and Maine is No. 41.

Wyoming is dead last.

As for major cities, Boston comes in at a lowly No. 15, way below New Orleans (No. 1), Washington D.C. (2) and New York City (4).

There are so many jokes possible – many starting with “Live Free and ...” – that we'll just end this story right here.

and this is based on what exactly? there's no science involved in this "study" at all.

(MT)Montanafowler wrote:and this is based on what exactly? there's no science involved in this "study" at all.

Sales data

You sound offended.

capt1972 wrote:

(MT)Montanafowler wrote:and this is based on what exactly? there's no science involved in this "study" at all.

Sales data

still means jack squat. i've never known anyone who bought condoms online. hell, who would actually pay for condoms in the first place? they give them out free in every health clinic.

(MT)Montanafowler wrote:

capt1972 wrote:

(MT)Montanafowler wrote:and this is based on what exactly? there's no science involved in this "study" at all.

Sales data

still means jack squat. i've never known anyone who bought condoms online. hell, who would actually pay for condoms in the first place? they give them out free in every health clinic.

Yeah, the small ones

i'm just calling bullshit on the methods here. the "study" has too many biases to even be remotely plausible.

(MT)Montanafowler wrote:i'm just calling bullshit on the methods here. the "study" has too many biases to even be remotely plausible.

Facts are facts! They sold more large condoms in NH than any other state.

(MT)Montanafowler wrote:i'm just calling bullshit on the methods here. the "study" has too many biases to even be remotely plausible.

"She didn't mean nothin by it. She just laughed when she saw he had a teensy pecker"

capt1972 wrote:

(MT)Montanafowler wrote:i'm just calling bullshit on the methods here. the "study" has too many biases to even be remotely plausible.

Facts are facts! They sold more large condoms in NH than any other state.

and it still doesn't mean shit, because your sample size is too limited and biased.

(MT)Montanafowler wrote:

capt1972 wrote:

(MT)Montanafowler wrote:i'm just calling bullshit on the methods here. the "study" has too many biases to even be remotely plausible.

Facts are facts! They sold more large condoms in NH than any other state.

and it still doesn't mean shit, because your sample size is too limited and biased.

Maybe yours is limited but mine is just fine according to the survey

I'd say it's pretty sound data.

flight control wrote:I'd say it's pretty sound data.

One might even say firm data.

Can't argue with hard numbers

This thread is killin me. Especially with MT arguing it

capt1972 wrote:

(MT)Montanafowler wrote:

capt1972 wrote:

(MT)Montanafowler wrote:and this is based on what exactly? there's no science involved in this "study" at all.

Sales data

still means jack squat. i've never known anyone who bought condoms online. hell, who would actually pay for condoms in the first place? they give them out free in every health clinic.

Yeah, the small ones

hahahahahaha

capt1972 wrote:

flight control wrote:I'd say it's pretty sound data.

One might even say firm data.

I may have commented prematurely. I should have tought of that.

Redbeard wrote:This thread is killin me. Especially with MT arguing it

X100 usda

flight control wrote:

capt1972 wrote:

flight control wrote:I'd say it's pretty sound data.

One might even say firm data.

I may have commented prematurely. I should have tought of that.

I swear this has never happened before......

3geese4me wrote:

flight control wrote:

capt1972 wrote:

flight control wrote:I'd say it's pretty sound data.

One might even say firm data.

I may have commented prematurely. I should have tought of that.

I swear this has never happened before......

As far as I'm concerned, I can't comment fast enough...

3geese4me wrote:

flight control wrote:

capt1972 wrote:

flight control wrote:I'd say it's pretty sound data.

One might even say firm data.

I may have commented prematurely. I should have tought of that.

I swear this has never happened before......

I dont remember everyone being so gay when Flint went Global. It was always alot of beers and grilling and beating dogs, thats what I like!

well, it appears that this tread is on its way to being a huge success. it keeps growing and growing. just be gentle with it, at least at first.

I don't know if it can go much longer, seems to reaching a climax.

oh I think it has longevity and stamina.

DeadEye_Dan wrote:I don't know if it can go much longer, seems to reaching a climax.

There, that should keep it from climaxing for another few pages.

(MT)Montanafowler wrote:

capt1972 wrote:

(MT)Montanafowler wrote:and this is based on what exactly? there's no science involved in this "study" at all.

Sales data

still means jack squat. i've never known anyone who bought condoms online. hell, who would actually pay for condoms in the first place? they give them out free in every health clinic.

If you used those condoms, you would probably spend less time in those health clinics. I didn't know they gave condoms away for free, but then again I would probably still buy the ones I wanted. Don't be a cheap fucker MT!

Tiler_J wrote:If you used those condoms, you would probably spend less time in those health clinics. I didn't know they gave condoms away for free, but then again I would probably still buy the ones I wanted. Don't be a cheap fucker MT!

i'm never a fool, i always wrap my tool

and i'm not a cheap fucker, i'm just not dumb enough to buy condoms when i can get them free.

(MT)Montanafowler wrote:

Tiler_J wrote:If you used those condoms, you would probably spend less time in those health clinics. I didn't know they gave condoms away for free, but then again I would probably still buy the ones I wanted. Don't be a cheap fucker MT!

i'm never a fool, i always wrap my tool

and i'm not a cheap fucker, i'm just not dumb enough to buy condoms when i can get them free.

yeah, the small ones






yup, still funny!

capt1972 wrote:yeah, the small ones






yup, still funny!

i may not hit the back, but i'll beat the shit out of the sidewalls!