Re: New gadget lovers
Posted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 10:33 pm
jehler wrote:Better
http://youtu.be/pAFcl3SamHc
Saw that the other day. I want one now.
Duck Hunting Forum, Goose Hunting Forum, Waterfowl Hunting, Duck Boats.
https://www.waterfowlforum.net/
jehler wrote:Better
http://youtu.be/pAFcl3SamHc
3legged_lab wrote:Sooooo... that's a "no" from everybody on the broadheads? They do look like the biohazard symbol so they are probably dangerous.
The Duck Hammer wrote:FlintRiverFowler wrote:If you'll notice in the video you have to shoot the hog in the temple to kill it.
Sent using tapatalk
With no exit wound. Bullet hardly enters the skull.
The Duck Hammer wrote:3legged_lab wrote:Sooooo... that's a "no" from everybody on the broadheads? They do look like the biohazard symbol so they are probably dangerous.
I would probably shoot them before I picked these.
assateague wrote:The Duck Hammer wrote:FlintRiverFowler wrote:If you'll notice in the video you have to shoot the hog in the temple to kill it.
Sent using tapatalk
With no exit wound. Bullet hardly enters the skull.
100% energy transfer. Ideal.
NuffDaddy wrote:The Duck Hammer wrote:3legged_lab wrote:Sooooo... that's a "no" from everybody on the broadheads? They do look like the biohazard symbol so they are probably dangerous.
I would probably shoot them before I picked these.
What the hell would you use that for?
The Duck Hammer wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:The Duck Hammer wrote:3legged_lab wrote:Sooooo... that's a "no" from everybody on the broadheads? They do look like the biohazard symbol so they are probably dangerous.
I would probably shoot them before I picked these.
What the hell would you use that for?
A broadhead dumbass.
NuffDaddy wrote:The Duck Hammer wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:The Duck Hammer wrote:3legged_lab wrote:Sooooo... that's a "no" from everybody on the broadheads? They do look like the biohazard symbol so they are probably dangerous.
I would probably shoot them before I picked these.
What the hell would you use that for?
A broadhead dumbass.
Easy now.
It's just a field tip with some dumb spreader barb thing on it.
The Duck Hammer wrote:assateague wrote:The Duck Hammer wrote:FlintRiverFowler wrote:If you'll notice in the video you have to shoot the hog in the temple to kill it.
Sent using tapatalk
With no exit wound. Bullet hardly enters the skull.
100% energy transfer. Ideal.
Not when that energy transfer is far less than just slinging an arrow at it in the first place.
100% of 5 is less than 20% of 50. Just as a simplified example.
The Duck Hammer wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:The Duck Hammer wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:The Duck Hammer wrote:[quote="3legged_lab"]Sooooo... that's a "no" from everybody on the broadheads? They do look like the biohazard symbol so they are probably dangerous.
I would probably shoot them before I picked these.
What the hell would you use that for?
A broadhead dumbass.
Easy now.
It's just a field tip with some dumb spreader barb thing on it.
AKPirate wrote:This thread was fantastic!
AKPirate wrote:This thread was fantastic!
The Duck Hammer wrote:AKPirate wrote:This thread was fantastic!
What do you mean was?
3legged_lab wrote:The Duck Hammer wrote:Not when that energy transfer is far less than just slinging an arrow at it in the first place.
100% of 5 is less than 20% of 50. Just as a simplified example.
Do you have references for these stats?
undeniableassateague wrote:Bad. Ass.
3legged_lab wrote:The Duck Hammer wrote:assateague wrote:The Duck Hammer wrote:FlintRiverFowler wrote:If you'll notice in the video you have to shoot the hog in the temple to kill it.
Sent using tapatalk
With no exit wound. Bullet hardly enters the skull.
100% energy transfer. Ideal.
Not when that energy transfer is far less than just slinging an arrow at it in the first place.
100% of 5 is less than 20% of 50. Just as a simplified example.
Do you have references for these stats?
AKPirate wrote:The Duck Hammer wrote:AKPirate wrote:This thread was fantastic!
What do you mean was?
With those arrow bullets you would only have to nick an elephant and their would be guts everywhere. Would make the butchering job easier too.
jehler wrote:undeniableassateague wrote:Bad. Ass.
The Duck Hammer wrote:jehler wrote:Better
http://youtu.be/pAFcl3SamHc
Worthless. Why wouldn't you just shoot the mother fucker with a gun in the first place?
The Duck Hammer wrote:3legged_lab wrote:The Duck Hammer wrote:assateague wrote:The Duck Hammer wrote:[quote="FlintRiverFowler"]If you'll notice in the video you have to shoot the hog in the temple to kill it.
Sent using tapatalk
With no exit wound. Bullet hardly enters the skull.
100% energy transfer. Ideal.
Not when that energy transfer is far less than just slinging an arrow at it in the first place.
100% of 5 is less than 20% of 50. Just as a simplified example.
Do you have references for these stats?
Tomkat wrote:The Duck Hammer wrote:jehler wrote:Better
http://youtu.be/pAFcl3SamHc
Worthless. Why wouldn't you just shoot the mother fucker with a gun in the first place?
THIS
The guy I was hunting with Sat was upset I "shot that turkey too soon". Why?, I ask
"I wanted to see the show"
Bullshit,says I. I came to hunt, not play games.
Pissing around with gimmick arrows does not interest me personally. I am a gun guy, arrows are the reason the indians lost.
The Libertarian in me says that if you fellas want to do it, good for you. You know I am never one to judge others.
3legged_lab wrote:I don't need a calculator to figure out 100% of 5, but what I don't know is how you got those numbers. You made em up.
simplified example.