Re: Trap Season Journal Thread...
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 12:09 am
Tiler_J wrote:So you can't guess the number I am thinking of?
36
Duck Hunting Forum, Goose Hunting Forum, Waterfowl Hunting, Duck Boats.
https://www.waterfowlforum.net/
Tiler_J wrote:So you can't guess the number I am thinking of?
straight meat honkerR. Chapman wrote:That's why people miss those hard angles. It's the cause 95% of the time. Ask any professional shooter or instructor, they'll tell you the same thing.
ducks~n~bucks wrote:R. Chapman wrote:That's why people miss those hard angles. It's the cause 95% of the time. Ask any professional shooter or instructor, they'll tell you the same thing.
Um, I usually end up shooting in front of it, trying to over lead.
R. Chapman wrote:ducks~n~bucks wrote:R. Chapman wrote:That's why people miss those hard angles. It's the cause 95% of the time. Ask any professional shooter or instructor, they'll tell you the same thing.
Um, I usually end up shooting in front of it, trying to over lead.
And I'm guessing you're basing this off where the wad was in relation to the target? Wads lie.
R. Chapman wrote:ducks~n~bucks wrote:R. Chapman wrote:That's why people miss those hard angles. It's the cause 95% of the time. Ask any professional shooter or instructor, they'll tell you the same thing.
Um, I usually end up shooting in front of it, trying to over lead.
And I'm guessing you're basing this off where the wad was in relation to the target? Wads lie.
ducks~n~bucks wrote:R. Chapman wrote:ducks~n~bucks wrote:R. Chapman wrote:That's why people miss those hard angles. It's the cause 95% of the time. Ask any professional shooter or instructor, they'll tell you the same thing.
Um, I usually end up shooting in front of it, trying to over lead.
And I'm guessing you're basing this off where the wad was in relation to the target? Wads lie.
No I'm basing this off of I usually shorten my lead and hit the target.
ducks~n~bucks wrote:R. Chapman wrote:ducks~n~bucks wrote:R. Chapman wrote:That's why people miss those hard angles. It's the cause 95% of the time. Ask any professional shooter or instructor, they'll tell you the same thing.
Um, I usually end up shooting in front of it, trying to over lead.
And I'm guessing you're basing this off where the wad was in relation to the target? Wads lie.
No I'm basing this off of I usually shorten my lead and hit the target.
assateague wrote:R. Chapman wrote:ducks~n~bucks wrote:R. Chapman wrote:That's why people miss those hard angles. It's the cause 95% of the time. Ask any professional shooter or instructor, they'll tell you the same thing.
Um, I usually end up shooting in front of it, trying to over lead.
And I'm guessing you're basing this off where the wad was in relation to the target? Wads lie.
Fucking lying wads.
3legged_lab wrote:ducks~n~bucks wrote:R. Chapman wrote:ducks~n~bucks wrote:R. Chapman wrote:That's why people miss those hard angles. It's the cause 95% of the time. Ask any professional shooter or instructor, they'll tell you the same thing.
Um, I usually end up shooting in front of it, trying to over lead.
And I'm guessing you're basing this off where the wad was in relation to the target? Wads lie.
No I'm basing this off of I usually shorten my lead and hit the target.
Well you clearly don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Increase your speed and don't look at the target. Let the Rex be with you.
R. Chapman wrote:That's a good thing you don't swing past the target so far. What you're doing is your eye to target relation is decent. When you swing too far in front, you're trying to aim the gun instead of flowing with the target. Basically you are referring back to the bead(s) which should be a big no-no.
ducks~n~bucks wrote:3legged_lab wrote:ducks~n~bucks wrote:R. Chapman wrote:ducks~n~bucks wrote:[quote="R. Chapman"]That's why people miss those hard angles. It's the cause 95% of the time. Ask any professional shooter or instructor, they'll tell you the same thing.
Um, I usually end up shooting in front of it, trying to over lead.
And I'm guessing you're basing this off where the wad was in relation to the target? Wads lie.
No I'm basing this off of I usually shorten my lead and hit the target.
Well you clearly don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Increase your speed and don't look at the target. Let the Rex be with you.
assateague wrote:Bitches. Never telling me the truth. Got 99 problems, and they're all wads.
DeadEye_Dan wrote:There's some internet gold in these last pages
R. Chapman wrote:Lightbody Memorial
88/100
18-23-24-23
I would of probably done better if I had shot a box or two before but oh well, I got 2nd in the short yardage group anyways.
3legged_lab wrote:R. Chapman wrote:Lightbody Memorial
88/100
18-23-24-23
I would of probably done better if I had shot a box or two before but oh well, I got 2nd in the short yardage group anyways.
Dont look back at the target. You are slowing your swing right before you pull the trigger and shooting behind the clay. And pay no attention to the wad, wads are liars.
3legged_lab wrote:R. Chapman wrote:Lightbody Memorial
88/100
18-23-24-23
I would of probably done better if I had shot a box or two before but oh well, I got 2nd in the short yardage group anyways.
Dont look back at the target. You are slowing your swing right before you pull the trigger and shooting behind the clay. And pay no attention to the wad, wads are liars.
Tiler_J wrote:3legged_lab wrote:R. Chapman wrote:Lightbody Memorial
88/100
18-23-24-23
I would of probably done better if I had shot a box or two before but oh well, I got 2nd in the short yardage group anyways.
Dont look back at the target. You are slowing your swing right before you pull the trigger and shooting behind the clay. And pay no attention to the wad, wads are liars.
3200 Man wrote:Rule # 1 Sustained lead is not for shooting trap targets !
Finding the line and pulling through the target is a better option but it takes proper gun fit and mount !
focusing on the leading edge of the target is habit forming once you learn how .
Wads do lie but Winchester has a shell out now that lies less !
assateague wrote:I still demand that this thread title be changed.
R. Chapman wrote:assateague wrote:I still demand that this thread title be changed.
Quit being intolerant of my thread titles.