(MT)Montanafowler wrote:DeadEye_Dan wrote:(MT)Montanafowler wrote:one2many wrote:so you want all small family farms gobbled up by the large "corporate farms". the small family farms are the ones that cant compete and are disappearing!
i would like your definition of a corporate farm.seeing as almost all family farms are INCs and LLCs and the like.
and what do you feel the states should regulate?
quite the contrary, I think that small farms are held to a standard that they can't survive in, hence why they are going under and being bought out. How are you supposed to grow crops when Monsanto can sue you for everything you're worth because of seed (genetic) drift? The farmer doesn't see more than 8 percent of the profit, most of it goes into the market. I consider farms in excess of 10,000 acres corporate. Places like that are diverse enough that they should be able to stand on their own, without subsidies. Farming practices need to change if we're ever going to have sustainable farming, we need to foster the ag industry by supporting and buying from the smaller farmers who are working toward sustainable farming practices and integrated agroecology. States should regulate whatever the federal system currently regulates, Like jehler said, the federal government is for protection and interstate commerce, we probably can't get back to just those, but the closer the better.
This is quite possibly the most backassward thing I've ever read on this site.
I've got news for you. The govt isn't keeping the 10,000 acre farmer in business. Those guys are sharks. They would love nothing more than the govt to stay the fuck out of their way and stop subsidizing everything. If they did that, the little farms would be gone faster than a blink of an eye.
The big are going to get bigger and the small are going to be acquired and or pushed out. Agriculture is no different than any other industry when it comes to economics.
what i mean is that they need two different levels of regulation. The system in place favors the large "corporate" farms. I'm saying stop subsidizing the farms over 10,000 acres. They are diverse enough to hold their own.
Dan, you and I are in agreement. maybe i worded my last post poorly, and granted, i am not a farmer so i don't know all the ins and outs. But to protect the smaller farms from being absorbed, we should break it into two separate entities of the ag industry. You can't compare a 450 acre farm to something like the Wheat Montana corporation. there are two totally different playing fields that need to be evaluated.
if i'm totally off base, let me know.
Why subsidize either of them?
This is The United States of America.
You are free to make your choices and live with the consequences.
Joe Farmer gets up in the morning and surveys his 400 acres and decides what to do with his day.
John Farmer gets up in the morning and surveys his 16,000 acres and decides what to do with his day.
They both have the same opportunity.
They both have what they have because it's exactly what they chose. If they want something different, then they have to make adjustments, take risks, and bust their ass. Same as any other American.
If Joe or John call me and ask for help, I'll ask the same question within the first 15 minutes. "So why did you choose to get into farming??"
99.9% of the time the "Joes" answer it one of two ways. A) "My family has farmed this land for xxx years. It's just kind of in my blood" or B) "because I was too stupid to do anything else"
90% of the time the "Johns" answer it this way - "Because I can make a lot of money and I enjoy this work"
Guess who I'm going to do business with?
The playing fields are exactly the same. Every 10,000 acre farm was a 100 acre farm at some point.
Every major automotive manufacturer was a little shop at some point.
Every hospital was a doctors office at some point.
Every big bank with offices in 60 countries was a little bank with one office once.
We shouldn't subsidize ANY of those.
Why the fuck should I pump money into a little farmer who doesn't have the drive, desire, business savvy, or ambition to make his business better??
What you are suggesting is communism.
Let the strong survive. Let the weak/lazy/stupid find something else to do.
And before you start making excuses for the little farmer -
One of my best friends is a guy who immigrated here 37 years ago at age 10 with his family. They did not own a farm. He graduated high school at 18. At at age 20 he bought 10 cows and started a little dairy farm.
Today, 27 years after buying his first cow, he owns about 8,000. And farms about 9,000 acres. And owns a transport fleet that hauls milk and feed commodities all over the Eastern US. Last year he bought a Peterbilt dealership. With all his business enterprises, he employs about 200 people. And he started from nothing.
Guess how much government subsidy he took last year?? $0. He's so opposed to the program, he won't even buy crop insurance. He buys irrigation instead.
Don't tell me that the little guy can't play in the big leagues.