gila-river wrote:Great, now the cops want to install dishwashers to. Just do your job Red and stop encroaching on our rights to replace appliances. That is not the responsibility of police.:lol:
jmitch wrote:Wrong. The "authorities" need to stop trying to protect people from themselves. If that guy was willing to die in order to try and save his kid then they have no damned business stopping from going in.
wrongjmitch wrote:Wrong. The "authorities" need to stop trying to protect people from themselves. If that guy was willing to die in order to try and save his kid then they have no damned business stopping from going in.
gila-river wrote:Great, now the cops want to install dishwashers to. Just do your job Red and stop encroaching on our rights to replace appliances. That is not the responsibility of police.:lol:
NuffDaddy wrote:But I guess if there was truly no way to save the kid, it was in the guys beat interest. In a situation like that I'm sure he wasn't thinking at all.
Kind of a rock an a hard place deal.
Redbeard wrote:wrongjmitch wrote:Wrong. The "authorities" need to stop trying to protect people from themselves. If that guy was willing to die in order to try and save his kid then they have no damned business stopping from going in.
how bout the firemen, who dressed in full gear, couldn't enter the building because of the intense heat?jmitch wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:But I guess if there was truly no way to save the kid, it was in the guys beat interest. In a situation like that I'm sure he wasn't thinking at all.
Kind of a rock an a hard place deal.
Who gets to make the decision that its a lost cause? The dude will spend the rest of his life thinking what if. It is a tough situation for everybody
gila-river wrote:Great, now the cops want to install dishwashers to. Just do your job Red and stop encroaching on our rights to replace appliances. That is not the responsibility of police.:lol:
Redbeard wrote:how bout the firemen, who dressed in full gear, couldn't enter the building because of the intense heat?jmitch wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:But I guess if there was truly no way to save the kid, it was in the guys beat interest. In a situation like that I'm sure he wasn't thinking at all.
Kind of a rock an a hard place deal.
Who gets to make the decision that its a lost cause? The dude will spend the rest of his life thinking what if. It is a tough situation for everybody
and I fully get what you're saying and I'd probably try and do the same thing the stepdad did, not thinking. At least he didn't widow his wife because of the actions takenjmitch wrote:Redbeard wrote:how bout the firemen, who dressed in full gear, couldn't enter the building because of the intense heat?jmitch wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:But I guess if there was truly no way to save the kid, it was in the guys beat interest. In a situation like that I'm sure he wasn't thinking at all.
Kind of a rock an a hard place deal.
Who gets to make the decision that its a lost cause? The dude will spend the rest of his life thinking what if. It is a tough situation for everybody
I get what you're saying I just don't think that's anybody else's decision that's all. May be a dumbassed decision but its still is his to make in my opinion
gila-river wrote:Great, now the cops want to install dishwashers to. Just do your job Red and stop encroaching on our rights to replace appliances. That is not the responsibility of police.:lol:
jmitch wrote:Redbeard wrote:how bout the firemen, who dressed in full gear, couldn't enter the building because of the intense heat?jmitch wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:But I guess if there was truly no way to save the kid, it was in the guys beat interest. In a situation like that I'm sure he wasn't thinking at all.
Kind of a rock an a hard place deal.
Who gets to make the decision that its a lost cause? The dude will spend the rest of his life thinking what if. It is a tough situation for everybody
I get what you're saying I just don't think that's anybody else's decision that's all. May be a dumbassed decision but its still is his to make in my opinion
Redbeard wrote:and I fully get what you're saying and I'd probably try and do the same thing the stepdad did, not thinking. At least he didn't widow his wife because of the actions takenjmitch wrote:Redbeard wrote:how bout the firemen, who dressed in full gear, couldn't enter the building because of the intense heat?jmitch wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:But I guess if there was truly no way to save the kid, it was in the guys beat interest. In a situation like that I'm sure he wasn't thinking at all.
Kind of a rock an a hard place deal.
Who gets to make the decision that its a lost cause? The dude will spend the rest of his life thinking what if. It is a tough situation for everybody
I get what you're saying I just don't think that's anybody else's decision that's all. May be a dumbassed decision but its still is his to make in my opinion
AKPirate wrote:The sins of Boot and Gaddy are causing the Cali drought and knowing they have no limits to their depravity... :mrgreen:
Redbeard wrote:Oh shit! Here we go again!
That's a tough one Doc. The stepdad's life was saved. But yes it is a free country.
Pops entering the building coulda put firefighters lives in danger trying to save him as well.
On the other hand, the news story the next morning would've read "last night local fire and police officials allowed a man to enter a home engulfed in flames. The man perished as fire personnel stood by and watched without making an attempt to save him. The local district attorney is filing charges against all fire and police official on scene. The case is currently under review."
AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
everyone knows firemen start fires for the overtimeBootlipkiller wrote:The cops lit the fire I bet!
gila-river wrote:Great, now the cops want to install dishwashers to. Just do your job Red and stop encroaching on our rights to replace appliances. That is not the responsibility of police.:lol:
Flightstopper wrote:Redbeard wrote:Oh shit! Here we go again!
That's a tough one Doc. The stepdad's life was saved. But yes it is a free country.
Pops entering the building coulda put firefighters lives in danger trying to save him as well.
On the other hand, the news story the next morning would've read "last night local fire and police officials allowed a man to enter a home engulfed in flames. The man perished as fire personnel stood by and watched without making an attempt to save him. The local district attorney is filing charges against all fire and police official on scene. The case is currently under review."
I'm with Red on this one, by stopping the guy from entering the building they did exactly what they are trained to do. If they let the step dad in then decide they need to go rescue him as well then at least two firefighters have to enter the structure. With two more ready to go at the door if they go down. As hard as it is there is really no winning in a situation like this.
rebelp74 wrote:Yeah I have a yacht, suck it bitches!
Bootlipkiller wrote:The cops lit the fire I bet!
rebelp74 wrote:Bootlipkiller wrote:The cops lit the fire I bet!
fucking cops
AKPirate wrote:The sins of Boot and Gaddy are causing the Cali drought and knowing they have no limits to their depravity... :mrgreen:
cops are trained for situations exactly like thisFeelin' Fowl wrote:Flightstopper wrote:Redbeard wrote:Oh shit! Here we go again!
That's a tough one Doc. The stepdad's life was saved. But yes it is a free country.
Pops entering the building coulda put firefighters lives in danger trying to save him as well.
On the other hand, the news story the next morning would've read "last night local fire and police officials allowed a man to enter a home engulfed in flames. The man perished as fire personnel stood by and watched without making an attempt to save him. The local district attorney is filing charges against all fire and police official on scene. The case is currently under review."
I'm with Red on this one, by stopping the guy from entering the building they did exactly what they are trained to do. If they let the step dad in then decide they need to go rescue him as well then at least two firefighters have to enter the structure. With two more ready to go at the door if they go down. As hard as it is there is really no winning in a situation like this.
If they already decided they weren't going to enter for the kid, why would they suddenly need to enter because someone else ran in?
I'm not a cop, but I can't imagine that they are trained for situations like this. I'm sure that the LEO's can argue that other training they have recieved can be applied here, but I find it hard to believe that this situation is covered in the academy.
I don't like that the guy wasn't allowed to make an attempt to go in, but on the other hand, I believe that most law enforcement agencies use the motto "To protect and serve". If that's accurate, then I would say that the cop was protecting the dad, and you could make an argument that he was trained to do just that...
I'm not sure how to feel about this one. Prayers for the family involved, and thankful that it wasn't something that I was involved in from either side.
gila-river wrote:Great, now the cops want to install dishwashers to. Just do your job Red and stop encroaching on our rights to replace appliances. That is not the responsibility of police.:lol:
Redbeard wrote:cops are trained for situations exactly like thisFeelin' Fowl wrote:Flightstopper wrote:Redbeard wrote:Oh shit! Here we go again!
That's a tough one Doc. The stepdad's life was saved. But yes it is a free country.
Pops entering the building coulda put firefighters lives in danger trying to save him as well.
On the other hand, the news story the next morning would've read "last night local fire and police officials allowed a man to enter a home engulfed in flames. The man perished as fire personnel stood by and watched without making an attempt to save him. The local district attorney is filing charges against all fire and police official on scene. The case is currently under review."
I'm with Red on this one, by stopping the guy from entering the building they did exactly what they are trained to do. If they let the step dad in then decide they need to go rescue him as well then at least two firefighters have to enter the structure. With two more ready to go at the door if they go down. As hard as it is there is really no winning in a situation like this.
If they already decided they weren't going to enter for the kid, why would they suddenly need to enter because someone else ran in?
I'm not a cop, but I can't imagine that they are trained for situations like this. I'm sure that the LEO's can argue that other training they have recieved can be applied here, but I find it hard to believe that this situation is covered in the academy.
I don't like that the guy wasn't allowed to make an attempt to go in, but on the other hand, I believe that most law enforcement agencies use the motto "To protect and serve". If that's accurate, then I would say that the cop was protecting the dad, and you could make an argument that he was trained to do just that...
I'm not sure how to feel about this one. Prayers for the family involved, and thankful that it wasn't something that I was involved in from either side.
gila-river wrote:Great, now the cops want to install dishwashers to. Just do your job Red and stop encroaching on our rights to replace appliances. That is not the responsibility of police.:lol:
Redbeard wrote:Tazer probably started the fire
Feelin' Fowl wrote:Flightstopper wrote:Redbeard wrote:Oh shit! Here we go again!
That's a tough one Doc. The stepdad's life was saved. But yes it is a free country.
Pops entering the building coulda put firefighters lives in danger trying to save him as well.
On the other hand, the news story the next morning would've read "last night local fire and police officials allowed a man to enter a home engulfed in flames. The man perished as fire personnel stood by and watched without making an attempt to save him. The local district attorney is filing charges against all fire and police official on scene. The case is currently under review."
I'm with Red on this one, by stopping the guy from entering the building they did exactly what they are trained to do. If they let the step dad in then decide they need to go rescue him as well then at least two firefighters have to enter the structure. With two more ready to go at the door if they go down. As hard as it is there is really no winning in a situation like this.
If they already decided they weren't going to enter for the kid, why would they suddenly need to enter because someone else ran in?
I'm not a cop, but I can't imagine that they are trained for situations like this. I'm sure that the LEO's can argue that other training they have recieved can be applied here, but I find it hard to believe that this situation is covered in the academy.
I don't like that the guy wasn't allowed to make an attempt to go in, but on the other hand, I believe that most law enforcement agencies use the motto "To protect and serve". If that's accurate, then I would say that the cop was protecting the dad, and you could make an argument that he was trained to do just that...
I'm not sure how to feel about this one. Prayers for the family involved, and thankful that it wasn't something that I was involved in from either side.
AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
rebelp74 wrote:Yeah I have a yacht, suck it bitches!
Feelin' Fowl wrote:He may have been one of Stan Lee's superhumans...
I'd fully expect this response from you and your avatarFeelin' Fowl wrote:He may have been one of Stan Lee's superhumans...
gila-river wrote:Great, now the cops want to install dishwashers to. Just do your job Red and stop encroaching on our rights to replace appliances. That is not the responsibility of police.:lol:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 108 guests