![:beer: :beer:](./images/smilies/cheers.gif)
jarbo03 wrote:A Thompson, cause you would look badass while spraying lead. If it were me in that situation, I might look at a Rem 7400 or 760 carbine. My dad has both and they are nice shooters.
GadwallGetter530 wrote:jarbo03 wrote:A Thompson, cause you would look badass while spraying lead. If it were me in that situation, I might look at a Rem 7400 or 760 carbine. My dad has both and they are nice shooters.
Thompson would be badass but not very practical.
jarbo03 wrote:GadwallGetter530 wrote:jarbo03 wrote:A Thompson, cause you would look badass while spraying lead. If it were me in that situation, I might look at a Rem 7400 or 760 carbine. My dad has both and they are nice shooters.
Thompson would be badass but not very practical.
Sometimes practicality needs to take a backseat, if you want to kickass. Definitely check out those guns, the 760 is a pump, and the 7400 is an auto. Some see through sight rings and you'd be covered.
DeadEye_Dan wrote:AR platform in .338 Federal
we knew damn well you were. It was written all over your first post. You just wanted someone else to say it firstGadwallGetter530 wrote:DeadEye_Dan wrote:AR platform in .338 Federal
I was thinking about an AR.
gila-river wrote:Great, now the cops want to install dishwashers to. Just do your job Red and stop encroaching on our rights to replace appliances. That is not the responsibility of police.:lol:
assateague wrote:Sometimes the quickest way to put out a fire is with an explosion.
DeadEye_Dan wrote:AR platform in .338 Federal
GadwallGetter530 wrote:I don't want to mess with my 270. Its a great gun. Ive taken lots of deer and hogs with it. I use it as a bush gun. But its not the right gun for that. Most of my shots on deer are with in 50 yards and they are flushing. Most of the time I jump the deer off their beds. I can shoot a bolt action quick but I know for a fact if I could get on target faster and especially with the second shot. I'd of had a hell of a lot more deer hanging over the years.
assateague wrote:Sometimes the quickest way to put out a fire is with an explosion.
R. Chapman wrote:I'm partial to bolt guns, so I'm only going to name bolt guns. If you could find one, how about a Remington 7 in .350 Remington Mag? Or a CZ rifle in 9.3x62mm? Or a Remington 700 Classic in .35 Whelen? Now if your a handloader, you can turn your .270 into a brush gun but shooting heavy bullets like the 160 gr Nosler Partition or 180 gr. Woodleigh Protected Point.
sws002 wrote:R. Chapman wrote:I'm partial to bolt guns, so I'm only going to name bolt guns. If you could find one, how about a Remington 7 in .350 Remington Mag? Or a CZ rifle in 9.3x62mm? Or a Remington 700 Classic in .35 Whelen? Now if your a handloader, you can turn your .270 into a brush gun but shooting heavy bullets like the 160 gr Nosler Partition or 180 gr. Woodleigh Protected Point.
I think you misunderstand the meaning of "brush gun". Brush guns are not shooting big heavy bullets that will "buck the brush", they are short nimble guns that handle easier in tight quarters. Sometimes you will see these paired up with calibers that shoot big, heavy bullets, but that is simply because if it is truly a brush gun, the shots are going to be at minimal ranges, so knockdown power is at a higher demand than range. A 9.3x62? Are you high? Who the hell in North America has ever recommended a 9.3x62? (RMFC, that's who) If you've ruled lever actions out, short of finding a used Ruger Carbine in .44 Mag or .357 (Good Luck!), the AR is going to be your best platform.
assateague wrote:Sometimes the quickest way to put out a fire is with an explosion.
R. Chapman wrote:I'm partial to bolt guns, so I'm only going to name bolt guns. If you could find one, how about a Remington 7 in .350 Remington Mag? Or a CZ rifle in 9.3x62mm? Or a Remington 700 Classic in .35 Whelen? Now if your a handloader, you can turn your .270 into a brush gun but shooting heavy bullets like the 160 gr Nosler Partition or 180 gr. Woodleigh Protected Point.
rebelp74 wrote:30-06 would also be solid choice.
GadwallGetter530 wrote:rebelp74 wrote:30-06 would also be solid choice.
Yup.
Olly wrote: We're still the bastard pirates of the duck forum world.
GadwallGetter530 wrote:With about optics?
GadwallGetter530 wrote:With about optics?
Olly wrote: We're still the bastard pirates of the duck forum world.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests