AKPirate wrote:The sins of Boot and Gaddy are causing the Cali drought and knowing they have no limits to their depravity... :mrgreen:
assateague wrote:So let me get this straight- you guys are for restricting freedom, as long as it's for what you believe to be a "good cause".
Chalk another one up for the "shell limit supporters are exactly the same as gun control advocates".
rebelp74 wrote:I can carry as many shells as I want where I hunt.
Willie wrote:assateague wrote:So let me get this straight- you guys are for restricting freedom, as long as it's for what you believe to be a "good cause".
Chalk another one up for the "shell limit supporters are exactly the same as gun control advocates".
You're free to pick and choose your shots like you've got some damn sense about you. Not spray and pray at every freakin duck that comes within 300 yards of you. Public game lands are a damn nightmare and if you limit the number of times the ass clowns can attempt to sky bust, chances are the hunting will be better for all in the area.
NuffDaddy wrote:rebelp74 wrote:I can carry as many shells as I want where I hunt.
My point exactly.
NuffDaddy wrote:They are bitching about loosing freedoms they don't have.
AKPirate wrote:The sins of Boot and Gaddy are causing the Cali drought and knowing they have no limits to their depravity... :mrgreen:
Bootlipkiller wrote:Where the fuck is Beef? Someone close this thread!!!!
NuffDaddy wrote:I'm done with this thread. Not much else I can say and you guys aren't understating what these places would be like with unlimited shells.
There are 70 parties all spaces out about 150-200 yards apart. 20k ducks flying around the refuge looking for a place to eat. With unlimited shells a guy could easily shoot 100 times in a half day hunt at out of range birds. They might hit 10 and find 2. Unless you've experienced over crowded management hunts you don't know the damage no shell limits would do.
rebelp74 wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:rebelp74 wrote:I can carry as many shells as I want where I hunt.
My point exactly.
You claim I don't have that freedom.NuffDaddy wrote:They are bitching about loosing freedoms they don't have.
AKPirate wrote:The sins of Boot and Gaddy are causing the Cali drought and knowing they have no limits to their depravity... :mrgreen:
rebelp74 wrote:Willie wrote:assateague wrote:So let me get this straight- you guys are for restricting freedom, as long as it's for what you believe to be a "good cause".
Chalk another one up for the "shell limit supporters are exactly the same as gun control advocates".
You're free to pick and choose your shots like you've got some damn sense about you. Not spray and pray at every freakin duck that comes within 300 yards of you. Public game lands are a damn nightmare and if you limit the number of times the ass clowns can attempt to sky bust, chances are the hunting will be better for all in the area.
Everyones health would be better too if it was limited to only healthy foods and products, everyones life would be safer if there weren't private transportation, etc, etc, etc. Your point is that you're against freedom?
Bootlipkiller wrote:
NuffDaddy wrote:rebelp74 wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:rebelp74 wrote:I can carry as many shells as I want where I hunt.
My point exactly.
You claim I don't have that freedom.NuffDaddy wrote:They are bitching about loosing freedoms they don't have.
Do you hunt a refuge?
Willie wrote:rebelp74 wrote:Willie wrote:assateague wrote:So let me get this straight- you guys are for restricting freedom, as long as it's for what you believe to be a "good cause".
Chalk another one up for the "shell limit supporters are exactly the same as gun control advocates".
You're free to pick and choose your shots like you've got some damn sense about you. Not spray and pray at every freakin duck that comes within 300 yards of you. Public game lands are a damn nightmare and if you limit the number of times the ass clowns can attempt to sky bust, chances are the hunting will be better for all in the area.
Everyones health would be better too if it was limited to only healthy foods and products, everyones life would be safer if there weren't private transportation, etc, etc, etc. Your point is that you're against freedom?
Exactly, I'm a COMMIE. I'd bold it too, but don't know how.
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
rebelp74 wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:rebelp74 wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:rebelp74 wrote:I can carry as many shells as I want where I hunt.
My point exactly.
You claim I don't have that freedom.NuffDaddy wrote:They are bitching about loosing freedoms they don't have.
Do you hunt a refuge?
No refuge to hunt here, but I do hunt wma's and the most over crowded public river this side of the mississippi.
NuffDaddy wrote:rebelp74 wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:Do you hunt a refuge?
No refuge to hunt here, but I do hunt wma's and the most over crowded public river this side of the mississippi.
Then no need to worry.
3legged_lab wrote:I've never had the displeasure of hunting a refuge with a shell limit. That said, I could see the pros of limiting the duck dynasties and fowl lifers from sky busting at every bird "they think" is in range but I would still never advocate for more government interference in hunting. They already butt in too much.
rebelp74 wrote:3legged_lab wrote:I've never had the displeasure of hunting a refuge with a shell limit. That said, I could see the pros of limiting the duck dynasties and fowl lifers from sky busting at every bird "they think" is in range but I would still never advocate for more government interference in hunting. They already butt in too much.
My sentiments exactly.
Willie wrote:I think duck stamps should be restricted to only those willing to pay $100 for the stamp. COMMIE!
rebelp74 wrote:Willie wrote:I think duck stamps should be restricted to only those willing to pay $100 for the stamp. COMMIE!
You're no fun
rebelp74 wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:rebelp74 wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:Do you hunt a refuge?
No refuge to hunt here, but I do hunt wma's and the most over crowded public river this side of the mississippi.
Then no need to worry.
It is a matter of principle. Quit trying to further ruin and overpower an already too much ruined and overly powerful government. Go sign up for the obamacare that you are for.
Willie wrote:rebelp74 wrote:Willie wrote:I think duck stamps should be restricted to only those willing to pay $100 for the stamp. COMMIE!
You're no fun
I really don't think that. I get a kick out of people that say that. I don't want to pay another penny.
NuffDaddy wrote:rebelp74 wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:rebelp74 wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:Do you hunt a refuge?
No refuge to hunt here, but I do hunt wma's and the most over crowded public river this side of the mississippi.
Then no need to worry.
It is a matter of principle. Quit trying to further ruin and overpower an already too much ruined and overly powerful government. Go sign up for the obamacare that you are for.
Already did. Thanks man. It's almost free for me thanks to you rich guys. Obama rules!!!!!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 106 guests