Considering a .35?

Place for general and off topic Waterfowl talk.

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby one2many » Thu Oct 24, 2013 8:09 pm

NuffDaddy wrote:I can hit an apple at 100 yards with no problem. But there are too many variables when shooting a living animal in the woods. Maybe there is a little twig you can't see half way between me and the deer...maybe the deer moves his head a little right as you pull the trigger...a chest shot is a lot safer and kills the deer just fine.

a lot safer?? and your chest shot dont kill them like flipping the switch on their central nervous system.you keep tracking then chest shot deer in rifle season. i will save that work for bow season.
maybe it moves? wtf i thought they all stood still while we took aim :roll:
im happy you can shoot an apple. now work hard and someday you will trust yourself
No helicopter looking for a murder
Two in the mornin got the Fatburger
Even saw the lights of the Goodyear Blimp
And it read, "Jeffys a pimp"
User avatar
one2many
 
Posts: 5012
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 5:55 pm
Location: 37 miles from the middle of nowhere

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby one2many » Thu Oct 24, 2013 8:11 pm

huntall6 wrote:
one2many wrote:
Rick wrote:
one2many wrote:2nd why the fuck would you take a chest shot on a squirrel?


Because my grandpa wouldn't give me another bullet that day if I wasted anything but what little meat's on the ribs. And I really wanted to get back out there and shoot another squirrel.

im not into squirrel brains at all



Cheeks. some consider them the best part of the little fuckers.

most animals cheek meat is the best cut,but not enough on a tree rat for me to care about
No helicopter looking for a murder
Two in the mornin got the Fatburger
Even saw the lights of the Goodyear Blimp
And it read, "Jeffys a pimp"
User avatar
one2many
 
Posts: 5012
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 5:55 pm
Location: 37 miles from the middle of nowhere

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby Rick » Thu Oct 24, 2013 8:13 pm

Take out both lungs, and Ray Charles could "track" 'em.
Rick
 
Posts: 12195
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 8:38 pm

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby one2many » Thu Oct 24, 2013 8:18 pm

Rick wrote:Take out both lungs, and Ray Charles could "track" 'em.

drop them where the stand and nobody needs to track anything.
i save all that work for bow hunting.
No helicopter looking for a murder
Two in the mornin got the Fatburger
Even saw the lights of the Goodyear Blimp
And it read, "Jeffys a pimp"
User avatar
one2many
 
Posts: 5012
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 5:55 pm
Location: 37 miles from the middle of nowhere

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby 3legged_lab » Thu Oct 24, 2013 8:22 pm

Rick wrote:Take out both lungs, and Ray Charles could "track" 'em.

I've had the exception happen to me. Although I admit it was a high double lung, it went forever and the deer was another 200 yards beyond the end of the blood trail.
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
User avatar
3legged_lab
WFF Supporter
 
Posts: 17344
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:19 pm
Location: OREGON

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby one2many » Thu Oct 24, 2013 8:30 pm

3legged_lab wrote:
Rick wrote:Take out both lungs, and Ray Charles could "track" 'em.

I've had the exception happen to me. Although I admit it was a high double lung, it went forever and the deer was another 200 yards beyond the end of the blood trail.

you suck :beer: glad you recovered it. can you use dogs to track wounded or downed game out your way? we cant here in Iowa pisses me off.
No helicopter looking for a murder
Two in the mornin got the Fatburger
Even saw the lights of the Goodyear Blimp
And it read, "Jeffys a pimp"
User avatar
one2many
 
Posts: 5012
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 5:55 pm
Location: 37 miles from the middle of nowhere

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby NuffDaddy » Thu Oct 24, 2013 8:33 pm

one2many wrote:
NuffDaddy wrote:I can hit an apple at 100 yards with no problem. But there are too many variables when shooting a living animal in the woods. Maybe there is a little twig you can't see half way between me and the deer...maybe the deer moves his head a little right as you pull the trigger...a chest shot is a lot safer and kills the deer just fine.

a lot safer?? and your chest shot dont kill them like flipping the switch on their central nervous system.you keep tracking then chest shot deer in rifle season. i will save that work for bow season.
maybe it moves? wtf i thought they all stood still while we took aim :roll:
im happy you can shoot an apple. now work hard and someday you will trust yourself

Most flop within sight, and the ones that don't are not that difficult to track.
And like I've said many times, and I'll say it one more, I trust my shooting 100%. What I don't trust is everything between me and the deer I can't control.
Head shots are unethical shots...period. You do what works for you and I'll do what works for me.
User avatar
NuffDaddy
WFF Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 2:05 pm
Location: Saginaw Bay, Michigan

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby 3legged_lab » Thu Oct 24, 2013 8:38 pm

one2many wrote:
3legged_lab wrote:
Rick wrote:Take out both lungs, and Ray Charles could "track" 'em.

I've had the exception happen to me. Although I admit it was a high double lung, it went forever and the deer was another 200 yards beyond the end of the blood trail.

you suck :beer: glad you recovered it. can you use dogs to track wounded or downed game out your way? we cant here in Iowa pisses me off.

It was an archery double lung, my theory is (because when we went to roll the guts he was full of blood) that he bled internally, but ran out before it hit the new "overflow" hole I made.
I give all the credit for the find to my buddy, he was a blood hound on that deer. And I'm actually not sure about the dogs for recovery here.
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
User avatar
3legged_lab
WFF Supporter
 
Posts: 17344
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:19 pm
Location: OREGON

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby one2many » Thu Oct 24, 2013 8:41 pm

NuffDaddy wrote:
one2many wrote:
NuffDaddy wrote:I can hit an apple at 100 yards with no problem. But there are too many variables when shooting a living animal in the woods. Maybe there is a little twig you can't see half way between me and the deer...maybe the deer moves his head a little right as you pull the trigger...a chest shot is a lot safer and kills the deer just fine.

a lot safer?? and your chest shot dont kill them like flipping the switch on their central nervous system.you keep tracking then chest shot deer in rifle season. i will save that work for bow season.
maybe it moves? wtf i thought they all stood still while we took aim :roll:
im happy you can shoot an apple. now work hard and someday you will trust yourself

Most flop within sight, and the ones that don't are not that difficult to track.
And like I've said many times, and I'll say it one more, I trust my shooting 100%. What I don't trust is everything between me and the deer I can't control.
Head shots are unethical shots...period. You do what works for you and I'll do what works for me.

the fuck they are.... period. i help out a company shooting city deer at night and all are head shots with small chambered,silenced rifles. they all go down with out taking a step. no suffering no pain no waiting for death. its done and over then
you havent been deer hunting enough yet or you are the luckiest mother fucker there is.or you dont seem to think you should limit the animals suffering. chest shooting is the most ethical way right?
No helicopter looking for a murder
Two in the mornin got the Fatburger
Even saw the lights of the Goodyear Blimp
And it read, "Jeffys a pimp"
User avatar
one2many
 
Posts: 5012
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 5:55 pm
Location: 37 miles from the middle of nowhere

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby one2many » Thu Oct 24, 2013 8:49 pm

3legged_lab wrote:
one2many wrote:
3legged_lab wrote:
Rick wrote:Take out both lungs, and Ray Charles could "track" 'em.

I've had the exception happen to me. Although I admit it was a high double lung, it went forever and the deer was another 200 yards beyond the end of the blood trail.

you suck :beer: glad you recovered it. can you use dogs to track wounded or downed game out your way? we cant here in Iowa pisses me off.

It was an archery double lung, my theory is (because when we went to roll the guts he was full of blood) that he bled internally, but ran out before it hit the new "overflow" hole I made.
I give all the credit for the find to my buddy, he was a blood hound on that deer. And I'm actually not sure about the dogs for recovery here.

i hate when that happens. glad you got him :thumbsup:
No helicopter looking for a murder
Two in the mornin got the Fatburger
Even saw the lights of the Goodyear Blimp
And it read, "Jeffys a pimp"
User avatar
one2many
 
Posts: 5012
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 5:55 pm
Location: 37 miles from the middle of nowhere

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby The Duck Hammer » Thu Oct 24, 2013 8:55 pm

If you want a blood trail shoot them in the kidneys. All the blood has to go through there so it all has to come out.


Sent from my Vox Mortem
“When you're at the end of your rope, tie a knot and hold on” - Theodore Roosevelt

Olly wrote: We're still the bastard pirates of the duck forum world.


WFF Prostaff
User avatar
The Duck Hammer
 
Posts: 14027
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 7:42 pm
Location: The Chicken House

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby The Duck Hammer » Thu Oct 24, 2013 8:56 pm

one2many wrote:the fuck they are.... period. i help out a company shooting city deer at night and all are head shots with small chambered,silenced rifles. they all go down with out taking a step. no suffering no pain no waiting for death.


Can I come help? That sounds like a blast.
“When you're at the end of your rope, tie a knot and hold on” - Theodore Roosevelt

Olly wrote: We're still the bastard pirates of the duck forum world.


WFF Prostaff
User avatar
The Duck Hammer
 
Posts: 14027
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 7:42 pm
Location: The Chicken House

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby Goldfish » Thu Oct 24, 2013 9:09 pm

Lol, sod poodles

sent from a phancy fone
My absolute favorite time of the day is from just before dawn, until just after. Most folks will spend their entire lives in bed sleeping through that magical hour - Mean Gene
User avatar
Goldfish
 
Posts: 7009
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:33 am
Location: Up Nort Dontchaknow

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby NuffDaddy » Thu Oct 24, 2013 9:09 pm

one2many wrote:
NuffDaddy wrote:
one2many wrote:
NuffDaddy wrote:I can hit an apple at 100 yards with no problem. But there are too many variables when shooting a living animal in the woods. Maybe there is a little twig you can't see half way between me and the deer...maybe the deer moves his head a little right as you pull the trigger...a chest shot is a lot safer and kills the deer just fine.

a lot safer?? and your chest shot dont kill them like flipping the switch on their central nervous system.you keep tracking then chest shot deer in rifle season. i will save that work for bow season.
maybe it moves? wtf i thought they all stood still while we took aim :roll:
im happy you can shoot an apple. now work hard and someday you will trust yourself

Most flop within sight, and the ones that don't are not that difficult to track.
And like I've said many times, and I'll say it one more, I trust my shooting 100%. What I don't trust is everything between me and the deer I can't control.
Head shots are unethical shots...period. You do what works for you and I'll do what works for me.

the fuck they are.... period. i help out a company shooting city deer at night and all are head shots with small chambered,silenced rifles. they all go down with out taking a step. no suffering no pain no waiting for death. its done and over then
you havent been deer hunting enough yet or you are the luckiest mother fucker there is.or you dont seem to think you should limit the animals suffering. chest shooting is the most ethical way right?

Shooting city deer at night isn't hunting, so don't bring that shit into this.
I've been deer hunting for 9 years, so you make that call.
Minimal suffering from a lung shot...but a blown off lower jaw, thats suffering. And if you have been head shooting as long as you claim, I find it hard to believe you've never done it.
User avatar
NuffDaddy
WFF Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 2:05 pm
Location: Saginaw Bay, Michigan

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby one2many » Thu Oct 24, 2013 9:10 pm

The Duck Hammer wrote:
one2many wrote:the fuck they are.... period. i help out a company shooting city deer at night and all are head shots with small chambered,silenced rifles. they all go down with out taking a step. no suffering no pain no waiting for death.


Can I come help? That sounds like a blast.

by far the most fun i have deer hunting. only thing better i would think would be helicopter hog hunting
No helicopter looking for a murder
Two in the mornin got the Fatburger
Even saw the lights of the Goodyear Blimp
And it read, "Jeffys a pimp"
User avatar
one2many
 
Posts: 5012
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 5:55 pm
Location: 37 miles from the middle of nowhere

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby one2many » Thu Oct 24, 2013 9:13 pm

NuffDaddy wrote:
one2many wrote:
NuffDaddy wrote:
one2many wrote:
NuffDaddy wrote:I can hit an apple at 100 yards with no problem. But there are too many variables when shooting a living animal in the woods. Maybe there is a little twig you can't see half way between me and the deer...maybe the deer moves his head a little right as you pull the trigger...a chest shot is a lot safer and kills the deer just fine.

a lot safer?? and your chest shot dont kill them like flipping the switch on their central nervous system.you keep tracking then chest shot deer in rifle season. i will save that work for bow season.
maybe it moves? wtf i thought they all stood still while we took aim :roll:
im happy you can shoot an apple. now work hard and someday you will trust yourself

Most flop within sight, and the ones that don't are not that difficult to track.
And like I've said many times, and I'll say it one more, I trust my shooting 100%. What I don't trust is everything between me and the deer I can't control.
Head shots are unethical shots...period. You do what works for you and I'll do what works for me.

the fuck they are.... period. i help out a company shooting city deer at night and all are head shots with small chambered,silenced rifles. they all go down with out taking a step. no suffering no pain no waiting for death. its done and over then
you havent been deer hunting enough yet or you are the luckiest mother fucker there is.or you dont seem to think you should limit the animals suffering. chest shooting is the most ethical way right?

Shooting city deer at night isn't hunting, so don't bring that shit into this.
I've been deer hunting for 9 years, so you make that call.
Minimal suffering from a lung shot...but a blown off lower jaw, thats suffering. And if you have been head shooting as long as you claim, I find it hard to believe you've never done it.

never done it but then im sort of a big deal, people know me
you are so right shooting park deer at night isnt hunting look back i called it shooting and getting paid to do so
and chest shot deer dont flop like you claim
No helicopter looking for a murder
Two in the mornin got the Fatburger
Even saw the lights of the Goodyear Blimp
And it read, "Jeffys a pimp"
User avatar
one2many
 
Posts: 5012
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 5:55 pm
Location: 37 miles from the middle of nowhere

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby NuffDaddy » Thu Oct 24, 2013 9:19 pm

one2many wrote:
NuffDaddy wrote:
one2many wrote:
NuffDaddy wrote:
one2many wrote:[quote="NuffDaddy"]
I can hit an apple at 100 yards with no problem. But there are too many variables when shooting a living animal in the woods. Maybe there is a little twig you can't see half way between me and the deer...maybe the deer moves his head a little right as you pull the trigger...a chest shot is a lot safer and kills the deer just fine.

a lot safer?? and your chest shot dont kill them like flipping the switch on their central nervous system.you keep tracking then chest shot deer in rifle season. i will save that work for bow season.
maybe it moves? wtf i thought they all stood still while we took aim :roll:
im happy you can shoot an apple. now work hard and someday you will trust yourself

Most flop within sight, and the ones that don't are not that difficult to track.
And like I've said many times, and I'll say it one more, I trust my shooting 100%. What I don't trust is everything between me and the deer I can't control.
Head shots are unethical shots...period. You do what works for you and I'll do what works for me.

the fuck they are.... period. i help out a company shooting city deer at night and all are head shots with small chambered,silenced rifles. they all go down with out taking a step. no suffering no pain no waiting for death. its done and over then
you havent been deer hunting enough yet or you are the luckiest mother fucker there is.or you dont seem to think you should limit the animals suffering. chest shooting is the most ethical way right?

Shooting city deer at night isn't hunting, so don't bring that shit into this.
I've been deer hunting for 9 years, so you make that call.
Minimal suffering from a lung shot...but a blown off lower jaw, thats suffering. And if you have been head shooting as long as you claim, I find it hard to believe you've never done it.

never done it but then im sort of a big deal, people know me
you are so right shooting park deer at night isnt hunting look back i called it shooting and getting paid to do so
and chest shot deer dont flop like you claim[/quote]
Well good for you then. It's gonna happen some day though.
When the hell did I say they flop?? I just got done arguing with TK about how chest shot deer don't flop on the spot.
User avatar
NuffDaddy
WFF Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 2:05 pm
Location: Saginaw Bay, Michigan

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby 3legged_lab » Thu Oct 24, 2013 9:49 pm

I think we can all agree on one thing: deer hunting is like masturbation
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
User avatar
3legged_lab
WFF Supporter
 
Posts: 17344
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:19 pm
Location: OREGON

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby rebelp74 » Thu Oct 24, 2013 10:16 pm

3legged_lab wrote:I think we can all agree on one thing: deer hunting is like masturbation

Nope, masturbation is much more enjoyable than deer hunting.
Reinstate TomKat

4-20MJ
User avatar
rebelp74
 
Posts: 12506
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:49 am
Location: nw louisiana

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby 3legged_lab » Thu Oct 24, 2013 10:48 pm

rebelp74 wrote:
3legged_lab wrote:I think we can all agree on one thing: deer hunting is like masturbation

Nope, masturbation is much more enjoyable than deer hunting.

The funs over once you go bang, all that's left is clean up.
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
User avatar
3legged_lab
WFF Supporter
 
Posts: 17344
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:19 pm
Location: OREGON

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby one2many » Thu Oct 24, 2013 11:53 pm

3legged_lab wrote:
rebelp74 wrote:
3legged_lab wrote:I think we can all agree on one thing: deer hunting is like masturbation

Nope, masturbation is much more enjoyable than deer hunting.

The funs over once you go bang, all that's left is clean up.

yep and take a nap
No helicopter looking for a murder
Two in the mornin got the Fatburger
Even saw the lights of the Goodyear Blimp
And it read, "Jeffys a pimp"
User avatar
one2many
 
Posts: 5012
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 5:55 pm
Location: 37 miles from the middle of nowhere

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby rebelp74 » Fri Oct 25, 2013 1:09 am

Except deer hunting isn't really fun
Reinstate TomKat

4-20MJ
User avatar
rebelp74
 
Posts: 12506
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:49 am
Location: nw louisiana

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby Rick » Fri Oct 25, 2013 6:17 am

3legged_lab wrote:
one2many wrote:
3legged_lab wrote:
Rick wrote:Take out both lungs, and Ray Charles could "track" 'em.

I've had the exception happen to me. Although I admit it was a high double lung, it went forever and the deer was another 200 yards beyond the end of the blood trail.

you suck :beer: glad you recovered it. can you use dogs to track wounded or downed game out your way? we cant here in Iowa pisses me off.

It was an archery double lung, my theory is (because when we went to roll the guts he was full of blood) that he bled internally, but ran out before it hit the new "overflow" hole I made.
I give all the credit for the find to my buddy, he was a blood hound on that deer. And I'm actually not sure about the dogs for recovery here.


I was thinking rifle hunting and use Nosler ballistic tips that mush the lungs and generally drop the animal in its tracks or very close to it.
Rick
 
Posts: 12195
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 8:38 pm

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby Tomkat » Sat Oct 26, 2013 6:36 am

NuffDaddy wrote:
one2many wrote:
NuffDaddy wrote:
one2many wrote:
NuffDaddy wrote:I can hit an apple at 100 yards with no problem. But there are too many variables when shooting a living animal in the woods. Maybe there is a little twig you can't see half way between me and the deer...maybe the deer moves his head a little right as you pull the trigger...a chest shot is a lot safer and kills the deer just fine.

a lot safer?? and your chest shot dont kill them like flipping the switch on their central nervous system.you keep tracking then chest shot deer in rifle season. i will save that work for bow season.
maybe it moves? wtf i thought they all stood still while we took aim :roll:
im happy you can shoot an apple. now work hard and someday you will trust yourself

Most flop within sight, and the ones that don't are not that difficult to track.
And like I've said many times, and I'll say it one more, I trust my shooting 100%. What I don't trust is everything between me and the deer I can't control.
Head shots are unethical shots...period. You do what works for you and I'll do what works for me.

the fuck they are.... period. i help out a company shooting city deer at night and all are head shots with small chambered,silenced rifles. they all go down with out taking a step. no suffering no pain no waiting for death. its done and over then
you havent been deer hunting enough yet or you are the luckiest mother fucker there is.or you dont seem to think you should limit the animals suffering. chest shooting is the most ethical way right?

Shooting city deer at night isn't hunting, so don't bring that shit into this.
I've been deer hunting for 9 years, so you make that call.
Minimal suffering from a lung shot...but a blown off lower jaw, thats suffering. And if you have been head shooting as long as you claim, I find it hard to believe you've never done it.


9 years you say?

I happen to agree with a lot of what you have written. You seem to have an unusually large emotional attachment to this argument. Let it go, there are lots of deer in the world. Jeff is trolling you, and you have taken the hook, line, and sinker.

No to head shots, IMO.
No to neck shots, IMO
YES to boiler room shots...and I aim for the heart.
User avatar
Tomkat
 
Posts: 6869
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 1:46 pm

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby assateague » Sat Oct 26, 2013 8:27 am

I would also argue that aiming for the heart isn't that great of a shot, statistically speaking. It most certainly isn't anywhere near center mass, and is quite low and forward on a standing deer.
User avatar
assateague
 
Posts: 23627
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:52 pm
Location: Eastern Shore, People's Republic of Maryland

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby (MT)Montanafowler » Sat Oct 26, 2013 9:10 am

assateague wrote:I would also argue that aiming for the heart isn't that great of a shot, statistically speaking. It most certainly isn't anywhere near center mass, and is quite low and forward on a standing deer.


and it's fucking delicious, not sure why you would shoot one of the best cuts of meat in the animal.
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:18 pm
huntall6 wrote:MT is right.



totally sig worthy!
User avatar
(MT)Montanafowler
 
Posts: 3707
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 4:19 pm

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby assateague » Sat Oct 26, 2013 10:42 am

I'd rather chew on bacon fat.
User avatar
assateague
 
Posts: 23627
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 4:52 pm
Location: Eastern Shore, People's Republic of Maryland

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby (MT)Montanafowler » Sat Oct 26, 2013 12:29 pm

assateague wrote:I'd rather chew on bacon fat.


also delicious!

hmm, gonna have to do chewy bacon fat wrapped deer heart someday...
Sun Jan 12, 2014 4:18 pm
huntall6 wrote:MT is right.



totally sig worthy!
User avatar
(MT)Montanafowler
 
Posts: 3707
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 4:19 pm

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby NuffDaddy » Sat Oct 26, 2013 3:34 pm

assateague wrote:I'd rather chew on bacon fat.

That's the best part of bacon.
User avatar
NuffDaddy
WFF Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 2:05 pm
Location: Saginaw Bay, Michigan

Re: Considering a .35?

Postby The Duck Hammer » Sat Oct 26, 2013 3:45 pm

NuffDaddy wrote:
assateague wrote:I'd rather chew on bacon fat.

That's the best part of bacon.


Yep, don't get that with crunchy bacon.
“When you're at the end of your rope, tie a knot and hold on” - Theodore Roosevelt

Olly wrote: We're still the bastard pirates of the duck forum world.


WFF Prostaff
User avatar
The Duck Hammer
 
Posts: 14027
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 7:42 pm
Location: The Chicken House

PreviousNext

Return to The Blind

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 81 guests