Anchorman 2 (spoilers!)

by **huntfishnv** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 12:09 am

Kinda feel like they tried to hard with this one. Still thought it was funny, although I could tell most of the people in the theater hadn't seen the first one and were confused the entire time. What do you guys think?

by **GadwallGetter530** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 12:13 am

huntfishnv wrote:Kinda feel like they tried to hard with this one. Still thought it was funny, although I could tell most of the people in the theater hadn't seen the first one and were confused the entire time. What do you guys think?

I will be checking it out soon. My first response to the trailer I saw was similar. Kinda like they might be trying to hard.

by **Redbeard** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 1:13 am

Sam and his buddies love it. Of course they're 13 years old

by **Bootlipkiller** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 1:15 am

Redbeard wrote:Sam and his buddies love it. Of course they're 13 years old

So that basically means ill love it. Thanks for the heads up red.

by **GadwallGetter530** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 1:34 am

Bootlipkiller wrote:
Redbeard wrote:Sam and his buddies love it. Of course they're 13 years old

So that basically means ill love it. Thanks for the heads up red.

Really? Thanks for the heads up Red? It's a fuckin movie that we based our Avatars on. We've only been quoting the fuckin thing for the last decade. Of coarse you "we" are going to see it. :lol:

by **Bootlipkiller** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 1:38 am

GadwallGetter530 wrote:
Bootlipkiller wrote:
Redbeard wrote:Sam and his buddies love it. Of course they're 13 years old

So that basically means ill love it. Thanks for the heads up red.

Really? Thanks for the heads up Red? It's a fuckin movie that we based our Avatars on. We've only been quoting the fuckin thing for the last decade. Of coarse you "we" are going to see it.

I'm just saying... It's nice to see some encouraging reviews.

by **GadwallGetter530** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 1:44 am

We should get jason and juicebox to go see it. Get all drunk before we go. :lol:

by **Bootlipkiller** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 1:51 am

Sounds good to me

by **FlintRiverFowler** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 3:20 am

GadwallGetter530 wrote:We should get jason and juicebox to go see it. Get all drunk before we go.

That's a bad idea, every time Ive gone to a movie drunk I've either passed out or missed the movie bc I was pissing the entire time.

by **GadwallGetter530** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 3:28 am

FlintRiverFowler wrote:
GadwallGetter530 wrote:We should get jason and juicebox to go see it. Get all drunk before we go.

That's a bad idea, every time Ive gone to a movie drunk I've either passed out or missed the movie bc I was pissing the entire time.

Whiskey young man. Drink it straight and bring in a few flasks. Less liquid ingested less likely hood of having to piss. I'm thinking some sort of scotch just for the occasion. :lol:

by **GadwallGetter530** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 3:30 am

I believe this would go nicely. :mrgreen:

by **Feelin' Fowl** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:05 am

Brooklyn Industries? Didn't know you were a designer clothing guy...

by **GadwallGetter530** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:08 am

Feelin' Fowl wrote:Brooklyn Industries? Didn't know you were a designer clothing guy...

I found that on the interwebs.

by **Feelin' Fowl** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:11 am

GadwallGetter530 wrote:
Feelin' Fowl wrote:Brooklyn Industries? Didn't know you were a designer clothing guy...

I found that on the interwebs.

Should have lied and said your wife bought it for you...

by **GadwallGetter530** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:36 am

Feelin' Fowl wrote:
GadwallGetter530 wrote:
Feelin' Fowl wrote:Brooklyn Industries? Didn't know you were a designer clothing guy...

I found that on the interwebs.

Should have lied and said your wife bought it for you...

Not sure why I would.

by **Redbeard** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 9:11 am

GadwallGetter530 wrote:
Bootlipkiller wrote:
Redbeard wrote:Sam and his buddies love it. Of course they're 13 years old

So that basically means ill love it. Thanks for the heads up red.

Really? Thanks for the heads up Red? It's a fuckin movie that we based our Avatars on. We've only been quoting the fuckin thing for the last decade. Of coarse you "we" are going to see it.

yes...really

by **huntfishnv** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 11:17 am

Let's just say there's even less of a story line in the new one than the first anchorman. I didn't think it could be done but they did it.

by **assateague** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 11:54 am

When something is as good as the first one was, you should probably just leave well enough alone and count your duckets, instead of trying to do it again.

by **Feelin' Fowl** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 12:15 pm

GadwallGetter530 wrote:
Feelin' Fowl wrote:
GadwallGetter530 wrote:
Feelin' Fowl wrote:Brooklyn Industries? Didn't know you were a designer clothing guy...

I found that on the interwebs.

Should have lied and said your wife bought it for you...

Not sure why I would.

Phil Robertson doesn't understand you.

by **bill herian** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 12:16 pm

assateague wrote:When something is as good as the first one was, you should probably just leave well enough alone and count your duckets, instead of trying to do it again.

Exactly. It was so funny because it was novel. Look at the Hangover.

When I read duckets I immediately pictured Al Pacino screaming at me. Going to have to watch that movie soon. Not my favorite Shakepeare, but not the worst.

by **sws002** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 1:33 pm

assateague wrote:When something is as good as the first one was, you should probably just leave well enough alone and count your duckets, instead of trying to do it again.

I tend to agree, although I enjoyed all the random Ron Burgundy appearances leading up to the movie

by **(MT)Montanafowler** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 9:58 pm

the first anchorman sucked ass, why would i want to see an even worse version?

by **Bootlipkiller** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 10:09 pm

(MT)Montanafowler wrote:the first anchorman sucked ass, why would i want to see an even worse version?

You're fucking high!

by **Olly** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 10:12 pm

(MT)Montanafowler wrote:the first anchorman sucked ass, why would i want to see an even worse version?

So Damn cool.

by **GadwallGetter530** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 10:15 pm

(MT)Montanafowler wrote:the first anchorman sucked ass, why would i want to see an even worse version?

You might be the winner for the least fun person on the planet award.

by **Redbeard** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 10:26 pm

GadwallGetter530 wrote:
(MT)Montanafowler wrote:the first anchorman sucked ass, why would i want to see an even worse version?

You might be the winner for the least fun person on the planet award.

I second this

by **Bootlipkiller** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 10:30 pm

Redbeard wrote:
GadwallGetter530 wrote:
(MT)Montanafowler wrote:the first anchorman sucked ass, why would i want to see an even worse version?

You might be the winner for the least fun person on the planet award.
I second this

Most definitely agree!

by **(MT)Montanafowler** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 10:32 pm

it honestly takes my #1 spot for shittiest movie ever.

by **AKPirate** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 10:33 pm

(MT)Montanafowler wrote:it honestly takes my #1 spot for shittiest movie ever.

You haven't seen many movies then Idaho

by **bill herian** » Thu Dec 19, 2013 10:35 pm

(MT)Montanafowler wrote:it honestly takes my #1 spot for shittiest movie ever.

It bothered you how they talked about Veronica didn't it?

Anchorman 2 (spoilers!)

Anchorman 2 (spoilers!)

Re: Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Re: Anchorman 2

Who is online