Flightstopper wrote:DeadEye_Dan wrote:So, why kill any of them then?
To quote DeadEye, "God makes more every spring"
FIFY - but the premise was correct
To quote a respected biologist friend of mine..."you can't stockpile birds"
Flightstopper wrote:DeadEye_Dan wrote:So, why kill any of them then?
To quote DeadEye, "God makes more every spring"
DeadEye_Dan wrote:Flightstopper wrote:DeadEye_Dan wrote:So, why kill any of them then?
To quote DeadEye, "God makes more every spring"
FIFY - but the premise was correct
To quote a respected biologist friend of mine..."you can't stockpile birds"
simplepeddler wrote:
If you wife could only shop sixty days a year, and could only buy two, or three or one of a certain thing a day would she be immoral is she "limited" every day?
Bufflehead wrote:You have no idea what my moral boundaries are and I damn sure didn't need any help from the government to establish them.Woody wrote:Bufflehead wrote:So your saying someone that crosses YOUR line, makes them unethical? Each state sets limits within the Federal Guidelines. Some guys travel all over the US and Canada in one season. If they're not breaking the law, how is what they're doing unethical?Woody wrote:blockmaker wrote:Best year ever, 1999/2000 in a 60 day season we killed 2101. And to woody and whomever else it offends that we kill that many, I'm sorry. I do this for a living. Look at numbers at some big hunt clubs. It's unreal.
No problem with a guide taking a hundred people out to kill that many, but if one guy kills 300 that's where I draw the line... If every hunter kills 300 a year there won't be any birds in short order. It's just being responsible.
Lots of legal things are unethical. If you are looking to the government for your moral boundaries, then you're not looking in the right place.
Have you ever killed your limit in one day? If so, why did you do it?
quackhead wrote:Woody wrote:blockmaker wrote:Best year ever, 1999/2000 in a 60 day season we killed 2101. And to woody and whomever else it offends that we kill that many, I'm sorry. I do this for a living. Look at numbers at some big hunt clubs. It's unreal.
No problem with a guide taking a hundred people out to kill that many, but if one guy kills 300 that's where I draw the line... If every hunter kills 300 a year there won't be any birds in short order. It's just being responsible.
Get real! If someone chooses to shoot 300 birds in a season that's their choice. If you don't think 300 is ok doesn't mean everybody else has to follow your rules.
quackhead wrote:This kind of crap gets old. There are way to many variables to come to a conclusion of those sorts.
It's okay if a guy is making a buck on it but not okay if a guy is filling his freezer or even sharing with his friends or family?
quackhead wrote:There are some places that shooting 50 birds a season may hurt and some places that you can't even touch the population by shooting thousands
6 less than there was yesterday.Woody wrote:
Someone remind me how many ducks there are again?
Bufflehead wrote:6 less than there was yesterday.Woody wrote:
Someone remind me how many ducks there are again?
DeadEye_Dan wrote:Sure you can. The average annual harvest per Hunter is like 4.5 birds per season...that's why the limits are set where they are.
Limits aren't set for the average Hunter....they are set for the 10% of the guys that already kill 90% of the ducks.
AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
Goldfish wrote:How do you kill so many birds, and remain in the law, when your possession limit is 3x the daily limit? Are you eating 6 ducks a day?
Flightstopper wrote:I've called the federal warden office before and asked the question on possession limits. They were dumbfounded I even bothered to call and ask. They laughed and said if I were to have a warden go to all the trouble to come to my house and look it's because I was already in hot water for being suspect of breaking other laws. Once you are home in your deep freeze they don't care.
AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
DeadEye_Dan wrote:Truth.
And that was my argument with the committee for 2 hen mallards when setting bag limits for MI this year.
Studies prove Hunter mortality have basically zero effect on the populations. So if you believe things to be so tenuous with the species that it cannot sustain 1 additional bird per hunter, then you should be advocating for a total season closure.
Crickets.
DeadEye_Dan wrote:Ah the old "I can't so no one else should be able to"
Goldfish wrote:How do you kill so many birds, and remain in the law, when your possession limit is 3x the daily limit? Are you eating 6 ducks a day?
Goldfish wrote:If that's the case, I'd imagine they have to be processed as well and not whole, which still puts you at cleaning a shit ton of birds, lol
(I don't know why you'd put birds in the freezer whole, but just saying)
AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
Woody wrote:DeadEye_Dan wrote:Ah the old "I can't so no one else should be able to"
Got nothing to do with it.
If you go back and read everything I wrote, it is my own opinion and I don't expect anyone to hold themselves to the standard I have for myself.
DeadEye_Dan wrote:I hunt with a couple CO's regularly and they both consider possession limits are for when you are in the filed and end when you reach your place of permanent residence.
DeadEye_Dan wrote:Woody wrote:DeadEye_Dan wrote:Ah the old "I can't so no one else should be able to"
Got nothing to do with it.
If you go back and read everything I wrote, it is my own opinion and I don't expect anyone to hold themselves to the standard I have for myself.
Bullshit. You wanted to stand on your soapbox and judge anyone who shoots more than some bullshit number you made up as some kind of game hog lacking morals and conservation ethics.
If you think anyone is buying your angle, then you're the only one because it comes off as jealousy and general whiny bitchiness.
Woody wrote:Also for the record I thought he was claiming 500 birds all to himself for a partial season, not to a group of hunters. If any of you are okay with that kind of behavior... Well I guess I'm happy to know I'll never interact with you more than on an Internet forum.
AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
Flightstopper wrote:Woody wrote:Also for the record I thought he was claiming 500 birds all to himself for a partial season, not to a group of hunters. If any of you are okay with that kind of behavior... Well I guess I'm happy to know I'll never interact with you more than on an Internet forum.Atop your high horse is no better place to base morals than government regulation.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 198 guests