AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
Woody wrote:DeadEye_Dan wrote:Woody wrote:DeadEye_Dan wrote:Ah the old "I can't so no one else should be able to"
Got nothing to do with it.
If you go back and read everything I wrote, it is my own opinion and I don't expect anyone to hold themselves to the standard I have for myself.
Bullshit. You wanted to stand on your soapbox and judge anyone who shoots more than some bullshit number you made up as some kind of game hog lacking morals and conservation ethics.
If you think anyone is buying your angle, then you're the only one because it comes off as jealousy and general whiny bitchiness.
Dan, the more I read what you have to say the more I'm glad I will never hunt with you.
AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
Flightstopper wrote:Then you have the delusion that I am wasting them. Wind up with a pile of duck hunter sticks everyone in the group likes. Eating plenty along throughout the season.
Woody wrote:
Like I said many time already, it isn't opinion based on my experiences and no where did I say anything that contradicts that.
But I guess when Dan is in charge, you might as well be North Korea. Keep opinions to yourself.
DeadEye_Dan wrote:Then feel free to disregard all the advice you've PM'd me for the past 2-3 years and next time I get a text message asking where to go and kill birds, I'll tell the asker to get fucked instead of sending a map.
Woody wrote:Dan, talking to you is like talking to a child. So defensive and argumentative.
Olly wrote:Woody wrote:
Like I said many time already, it isn't opinion based on my experiences and no where did I say anything that contradicts that.
But I guess when Dan is in charge, you might as well be North Korea. Keep opinions to yourself.
I think your opinion is valid for you and not a universal truth. I can see why some of the guys here got defensive.
AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
Woody wrote:
So can I, and that is why I'm keep saying it is my opinion. Nothing more.
Woody wrote:Flightstopper wrote:Then you have the delusion that I am wasting them. Wind up with a pile of duck hunter sticks everyone in the group likes. Eating plenty along throughout the season.
Like I said many time already, it isn't opinion based on my experiences and no where did I say anything that contradicts that.
But I guess when Dan is in charge, you might as well be North Korea. Keep opinions to yourself.
Olly wrote:DeadEye_Dan wrote:I hunt with a couple CO's regularly and they both consider possession limits are for when you are in the filed and end when you reach your place of permanent residence.
It's cool that think that but who gives a damn what one CO thinks? I would like to see the law be more specific. Vagueness of laws is only good for the ones in power.
DeadEye_Dan wrote:Woody wrote:Dan, talking to you is like talking to a child. So defensive and argumentative.
Yeah. I take offense to the implied idea that anyone who kills more than some bullshit made up number of ducks is pitching them.
DeadEye_Dan wrote:Tell me oh great one - eater of all that you kill - what do you do with mice you catch?
Better yet coyotes? Or coons? Or skunks?? As any one truly concerned with bird numbers should actively be killing those animals.
DeadEye_Dan wrote:
This gets lost, and I agree - the down side of no gray area, is that there is no gray area.
I've had bad experiences with law enforcement, but 90% of the time the guys were trying to enforce the spirit of the (game) laws not to the letter of the law.
Flightstopper wrote:You do whatever you want but there are gaping holes in the argument you are trying to justify yourself by.
DeadEye_Dan wrote:Olly wrote:DeadEye_Dan wrote:I hunt with a couple CO's regularly and they both consider possession limits are for when you are in the filed and end when you reach your place of permanent residence.
It's cool that think that but who gives a damn what one CO thinks? I would like to see the law be more specific. Vagueness of laws is only good for the ones in power.
This gets lost, and I agree - the down side of no gray area, is that there is no gray area.
I've had bad experiences with law enforcement, but 90% of the time the guys were trying to enforce the spirit of the (game) laws not to the letter of the law.
DeadEye_Dan wrote:Woody wrote:Flightstopper wrote:Then you have the delusion that I am wasting them. Wind up with a pile of duck hunter sticks everyone in the group likes. Eating plenty along throughout the season.
Like I said many time already, it isn't opinion based on my experiences and no where did I say anything that contradicts that.
But I guess when Dan is in charge, you might as well be North Korea. Keep opinions to yourself.
Feel free to spout stupid opinions as gospel as much as you'd like - just be prepared to defend and support those as gospel or incur the treatment your getting now.
Woody wrote:Flightstopper wrote:Woody wrote:blockmaker wrote:We are having one of the worst years I can remember in my 47 years of water fowling here in west ky and nw tn. Warm weather, no rain and very stale birds. Reminds of the old days of a 30 day season and the point system. Just now getting a little cold but only managed 3 today! Normally by now we are well over 500 birds, this year we have 76.
How many people do you hunt with to put down a number like 500?
Hunting 3-5 we've busted 1000 multiple years, especially drought years.
To be 100% honest, I see that as unnecessary and a not a good ethical practice. Conservation is supposed to be our foremost goal as hunters.
AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
But stating that those that kill more birds than your self imposed magic number are somehow unethical hunters isn't insulting?Woody wrote:You wrongly took offense to something and then went on the attack, Dan.
You are right in saying you have been very willing to help me in the past and like I said it has been greatly appreciated. Nothing said further will take back what I already said to you.
Still I'll say this, maybe I'm not in a good mood or had a bad day, don't know and doesn't matter... The things you said upset me and after a few comments I insulted you back, my bad. I apologize.
Flightstopper wrote:Bit of a difference in having an opinion and flat out calling people unethical for doing what they do.
Bufflehead wrote:But stating that those that kill more birds than your self imposed magic number are somehow unethical hunters isn't insulting?Woody wrote:You wrongly took offense to something and then went on the attack, Dan.
You are right in saying you have been very willing to help me in the past and like I said it has been greatly appreciated. Nothing said further will take back what I already said to you.
Still I'll say this, maybe I'm not in a good mood or had a bad day, don't know and doesn't matter... The things you said upset me and after a few comments I insulted you back, my bad. I apologize.
sws002 wrote:DeadEye_Dan wrote:Truth.
And that was my argument with the committee for 2 hen mallards when setting bag limits for MI this year.
Studies prove Hunter mortality have basically zero effect on the populations. So if you believe things to be so tenuous with the species that it cannot sustain 1 additional bird per hunter, then you should be advocating for a total season closure.
Crickets.
I truly believe MI had the suzie limit at 1 for the ticket revenue.
Woody wrote:Still I'll say this, maybe I'm not in a good mood or had a bad day, don't know and doesn't matter... The things you said upset me and after a few comments I insulted you back, my bad. I apologize.
DeadEye_Dan wrote:sws002 wrote:DeadEye_Dan wrote:Truth.
And that was my argument with the committee for 2 hen mallards when setting bag limits for MI this year.
Studies prove Hunter mortality have basically zero effect on the populations. So if you believe things to be so tenuous with the species that it cannot sustain 1 additional bird per hunter, then you should be advocating for a total season closure.
Crickets.
I truly believe MI had the suzie limit at 1 for the ticket revenue.
Maybe, but from my conversations it was more along the lines of generational beliefs along the same lines of "don't shoot does" that is rampant here in MI.
As soon as the hunters asked for it, the DNR was sort of like "finally"
gila-river wrote:Great, now the cops want to install dishwashers to. Just do your job Red and stop encroaching on our rights to replace appliances. That is not the responsibility of police.:lol:
Redbeard wrote:Hey boys! How goes the hunting? Been great here so far. Between Sam and I, we've harvested 987 birds. Over half have been canvasback and hen mallards. And we still have a month left to hunt. Well...have a nice one
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 186 guests