Moderator: Throbbin Rods
Rick wrote:The fewer we see, the greater the need to improve the percentage of them that end up front and center, for certain.
But a lot of it may just be caving to addiction. One of the things I recall from getting clean and sober is the conclusion a gal drew from her extensive study of addiction in prisoners, which was that those who managed to stay clean channeled their addictive natures into activities they derived a sense of pleasure from. That's me. And as someone recently noted on another board, "If it wasn't for duck hunting, I might have made something of myself."
Duck Engr wrote:They came out with a Brute XL this year that has a bigger exhaust, which I suspect would be more to your liking, though I’ve never blown one. Have tried both a brute and their original call and neither fit me. Realize I’m setting you back a step in your 12 step process…
Rick wrote:Duck Engr wrote:They came out with a Brute XL this year that has a bigger exhaust, which I suspect would be more to your liking, though I’ve never blown one. Have tried both a brute and their original call and neither fit me. Realize I’m setting you back a step in your 12 step process…
Naw, I was chasing a tone or resonance I've not heard from the XL examples I could find. So it's no temptation at all...yet. Might still find it in the R one day, which Spencer and crew rated just a single notch below the ("loud as we can make one without giving up something important") XL on their Brute comparison scale, So I'd not expect the XL to offer volume advantage over the loud-assed Singleton, either. The most tempting, to me, XL claim is for greater "looseness" than their other models, which should translate to greater tonal and volume versatility, which the Singleton has scads and scads more of than the R - at least given my tunings and in my hands.
Will note that I, too, had one of Rolling Thunder's early calls, a BSOD that I purchased along with one of Black Ops DFB and a Mondo when I first gave cutdowns a go. Of those, the Mondo was the closest to right for me out of the box (which still wasn't very without a bit of trimming), so I let the other two go and focused on it. But Spencer was apparently an obscure music fan and was nice enough to include a note about a musician and song he had done about hunting with a now-gone friend of mine here. And that thoughtfulness may have played a bit into my hope that I'd find something special in his more recent call.
Darren wrote:Always have to be tinkering, scheming, bettering our game. It's perhaps at times debatable as to whether I prefer the planning and prep for duck season as much or more than the grind of actually hunting them.
Whatever you come up with, hope its your new ticket to what you at least think might sell another duck or two into buying in. We'll look forward to what comes of the process along the way
Rick wrote:Mike, I got past expecting anything off the shelf to fit my particular physiology, methodology and tone preferences decades ago. All God's little duck and goose callers would be ahead learning to tune their own. Only stock reed in memory that I've been unable to improve on for me and mine was, surprisingly, the one John or Butch (one of whom then did all of their MVPs) cut for the stage.
Ricky Spanish wrote:Rick wrote:Mike, I got past expecting anything off the shelf to fit my particular physiology, methodology and tone preferences decades ago. All God's little duck and goose callers would be ahead learning to tune their own. Only stock reed in memory that I've been unable to improve on for me and mine was, surprisingly, the one John or Butch (one of whom then did all of their MVPs) cut for the stage.
New reeds and cork matters.
I bought a brand new mvp that'd been in the box so long its cork was no good. Remember?
Oh...
The joke goes like this, "that call sounds a bit flat you want me to pitch it for you?".
Do not surrender your call it will get pitched...into the water.
Ducaholic wrote:Darren wrote:Always have to be tinkering, scheming, bettering our game. It's perhaps at times debatable as to whether I prefer the planning and prep for duck season as much or more than the grind of actually hunting them.
Whatever you come up with, hope its your new ticket to what you at least think might sell another duck or two into buying in. We'll look forward to what comes of the process along the way
You sold me on the idea of the agitator duck decoys that squirt water. I found your thoughts on cutting the nozzle just under the water level to be a great idea to create more natural motion so this year I will sport two of them on the mornings where light or no wind at daylight has the spread looking dead and unattractive to wary 2nd split ducks. Just one example of never being to old to tinker
Darren wrote:Now back to uncle Rick's cutdown call tinkering.....I need to look up a few of these brands/names to better understand what the heck is goin on.
The kind y'all are discussing would be clogged three minutes after LST in the mudhole
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 93 guests