MOhuntingGuy wrote:I bet they were home schooled and lack the necessary social skills in life to take a joke.
obxbufflehead wrote:Were those pictures taken on the west side?
DeadEye_Dan wrote:If looks good in your photos, we tried it in 20' and it was marginal- took on a serious hourglass shape. It was definitely better in shallower water.
Bufflehead wrote:obxbufflehead wrote:Were those pictures taken on the west side?
they were taken on the west side of something
fucking cyberscout
there's a load of ducks where you were the day you saw me with my float blind. all the way up in there, not out where i was
MOhuntingGuy wrote:I bet they were home schooled and lack the necessary social skills in life to take a joke.
NuffDaddy wrote:What's the size and kind of the net you used? Looks good.
Sent from my badazz phone using a badazz app
MOhuntingGuy wrote:I bet they were home schooled and lack the necessary social skills in life to take a joke.
Bufflehead wrote:and it's dipped in latex paint
AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
the problem with the hour glass shape is the net will only be spread out a couple feet wide in the middle and all the decoys will be bumping.Flightstopper wrote:Bufflehead wrote:and it's dipped in latex paint
Looks like a clusterfuck of mass proportions at o' dark thirty on the water. "Hour glass shape" turn the birds that bad?
i've got longlines too but i don't usualy use them. only in deep water or if i want a bigger spread, think i used them twice this year. for divers i have around 250-275 on nets, 40 or 50 singles and about 10 dozen on longlines.Eric Haynes wrote:You don't run any lines?
Bufflehead wrote:the problem with the hour glass shape is the net will only be spread out a couple feet wide in the middle and all the decoys will be bumping.Flightstopper wrote:Bufflehead wrote:and it's dipped in latex paint
Looks like a clusterfuck of mass proportions at o' dark thirty on the water. "Hour glass shape" turn the birds that bad?
as fas being a clusterfuck, the singles i spread around it are a bigger pain in the ass and definitely more time consuming.
AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
assateague wrote:Maybe you could just anchor the running side, and let the trailing side float?
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
3legged_lab wrote:I saw some blueheads today.
Olly wrote: We're still the bastard pirates of the duck forum world.
Bufflehead wrote:netting is 1-3/4" strecthed mesh - #15 twine nylon netting . 200 meshes deep. #9 nylon crab pot line for the border. hung in place with #18 tarred twine.
200 mesh deep hangs a net about 13', length depends on how much you buy. the one in the picture is about 22' or 23'. i've a got couple shorter ones and one that is a little longer.
huntfishnv wrote:Bufflehead wrote:netting is 1-3/4" strecthed mesh - #15 twine nylon netting . 200 meshes deep. #9 nylon crab pot line for the border. hung in place with #18 tarred twine.
200 mesh deep hangs a net about 13', length depends on how much you buy. the one in the picture is about 22' or 23'. i've a got couple shorter ones and one that is a little longer.
I like the way that looks. What's the advantage in using something like that? I have a diver spot that I think this would be perfect for...
Return to Diver Duck Hunting Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest