banknote wrote:http://www.statesmanjournal.com/article/20130222/UPDATE/130222029/Verdict-Collier-found-not-guilty-all-charges
Has no bear tag. Shoots at what he thought was a bear in a baited field. Discovers he made a one shot kill on a 20 year old man. Acquitted on all counts.
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
Bulldog0156 wrote:Natural selection for the win!
banknote wrote:He was visiting and "hiking" with an older gentleman described as a friend. Older stories had that he was hunched over picking mushrooms, but testimony indicates otherwise. And yes, he was trespassing, purportedly unknowingly.
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
assateague wrote:Surprised he didn't get a twofer with one shot.
AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
you can tell them you are hunting eagles and there's not any thing they can do until you shoot one.banknote wrote:Dead guy was a 20 year old Marine reservist from CA. He was visiting and "hiking" with an older gentleman described as a friend. Older stories had that he was hunched over picking mushrooms, but testimony indicates otherwise. And yes, he was trespassing, purportedly unknowingly.
Shooter was on his brother's property and admitted to responding officers that he had no bear tag, but thought he was shooting at a bear. In testimony he said "I look and there's something on its hands and knees," which seems to me like an odd way to describe a bear. "It looks like a bear. I adjust to the target, then shoot it. I'm still certain it's a bear." As he approached from 100 yards away he realized it was a person.
Whatever the circumstances, he misidentified a target and killed a person while shooting at what he thought was an animal he was not licensed to hunt. How this equates to multiple acquittals and no convictions of either criminal or hunting violations is beyond me. Probably came down to the lawyering; a bad prosecutor, a good defense, or both.
In any case, I hope I'm never in the woods anywhere near where Mr. Collier is hunting.
Bufflehead wrote:you can tell them you are hunting eagles and there's not any thing they can do until you shoot one.banknote wrote:Dead guy was a 20 year old Marine reservist from CA. He was visiting and "hiking" with an older gentleman described as a friend. Older stories had that he was hunched over picking mushrooms, but testimony indicates otherwise. And yes, he was trespassing, purportedly unknowingly.
Shooter was on his brother's property and admitted to responding officers that he had no bear tag, but thought he was shooting at a bear. In testimony he said "I look and there's something on its hands and knees," which seems to me like an odd way to describe a bear. "It looks like a bear. I adjust to the target, then shoot it. I'm still certain it's a bear." As he approached from 100 yards away he realized it was a person.
Whatever the circumstances, he misidentified a target and killed a person while shooting at what he thought was an animal he was not licensed to hunt. How this equates to multiple acquittals and no convictions of either criminal or hunting violations is beyond me. Probably came down to the lawyering; a bad prosecutor, a good defense, or both.
In any case, I hope I'm never in the woods anywhere near where Mr. Collier is hunting.
he didn't shoot a bear
Bufflehead wrote:you can tell them you are hunting eagles and there's not any thing they can do until you shoot one.banknote wrote:Dead guy was a 20 year old Marine reservist from CA. He was visiting and "hiking" with an older gentleman described as a friend. Older stories had that he was hunched over picking mushrooms, but testimony indicates otherwise. And yes, he was trespassing, purportedly unknowingly.
Shooter was on his brother's property and admitted to responding officers that he had no bear tag, but thought he was shooting at a bear. In testimony he said "I look and there's something on its hands and knees," which seems to me like an odd way to describe a bear. "It looks like a bear. I adjust to the target, then shoot it. I'm still certain it's a bear." As he approached from 100 yards away he realized it was a person.
Whatever the circumstances, he misidentified a target and killed a person while shooting at what he thought was an animal he was not licensed to hunt. How this equates to multiple acquittals and no convictions of either criminal or hunting violations is beyond me. Probably came down to the lawyering; a bad prosecutor, a good defense, or both.
In any case, I hope I'm never in the woods anywhere near where Mr. Collier is hunting.
he didn't shoot a bear
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
Bufflehead wrote:you can tell them you are hunting eagles and there's not any thing they can do until you shoot one.banknote wrote:Dead guy was a 20 year old Marine reservist from CA. He was visiting and "hiking" with an older gentleman described as a friend. Older stories had that he was hunched over picking mushrooms, but testimony indicates otherwise. And yes, he was trespassing, purportedly unknowingly.
Shooter was on his brother's property and admitted to responding officers that he had no bear tag, but thought he was shooting at a bear. In testimony he said "I look and there's something on its hands and knees," which seems to me like an odd way to describe a bear. "It looks like a bear. I adjust to the target, then shoot it. I'm still certain it's a bear." As he approached from 100 yards away he realized it was a person.
Whatever the circumstances, he misidentified a target and killed a person while shooting at what he thought was an animal he was not licensed to hunt. How this equates to multiple acquittals and no convictions of either criminal or hunting violations is beyond me. Probably came down to the lawyering; a bad prosecutor, a good defense, or both.
In any case, I hope I'm never in the woods anywhere near where Mr. Collier is hunting.
he didn't shoot a bear
attempting to take simulated wildlife has the same punnishment as taking wildlife. so does "attempting" to take wildlife.3legged_lab wrote:I don't know buffie, we have some strict game laws in Oregon. I asked a trooper once about the "robo-buck" they use for catching poachers and road hunters, I asked how they can issue a ticket for "shooting a deer from a vehicle" when their "violator" only shot a deer hide wrapped over foam. My cousin can verify that the ticket will hold up in court.
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
3legged_lab wrote:I don't care what they say, if I shoot a yard gnome it doesn't mean jehler's lil buddies are in danger.
3legged_lab wrote:banknote wrote:He was visiting and "hiking" with an older gentleman described as a friend. Older stories had that he was hunched over picking mushrooms, but testimony indicates otherwise. And yes, he was trespassing, purportedly unknowingly.
Ha! My previous joke/prediction is relevent. Pickin mushrooms, eh?
3legged_lab wrote:Bufflehead wrote:you can tell them you are hunting eagles and there's not any thing they can do until you shoot one.banknote wrote:Dead guy was a 20 year old Marine reservist from CA. He was visiting and "hiking" with an older gentleman described as a friend. Older stories had that he was hunched over picking mushrooms, but testimony indicates otherwise. And yes, he was trespassing, purportedly unknowingly.
Shooter was on his brother's property and admitted to responding officers that he had no bear tag, but thought he was shooting at a bear. In testimony he said "I look and there's something on its hands and knees," which seems to me like an odd way to describe a bear. "It looks like a bear. I adjust to the target, then shoot it. I'm still certain it's a bear." As he approached from 100 yards away he realized it was a person.
Whatever the circumstances, he misidentified a target and killed a person while shooting at what he thought was an animal he was not licensed to hunt. How this equates to multiple acquittals and no convictions of either criminal or hunting violations is beyond me. Probably came down to the lawyering; a bad prosecutor, a good defense, or both.
In any case, I hope I'm never in the woods anywhere near where Mr. Collier is hunting.
he didn't shoot a bear
I don't know buffie, we have some strict game laws in Oregon. I asked a trooper once about the "robo-buck" they use for catching poachers and road hunters, I asked how they can issue a ticket for "shooting a deer from a vehicle" when their "violator" only shot a deer hide wrapped over foam. My cousin can verify that the ticket will hold up in court.
assateague wrote:3legged_lab wrote:Bufflehead wrote:you can tell them you are hunting eagles and there's not any thing they can do until you shoot one.banknote wrote:Dead guy was a 20 year old Marine reservist from CA. He was visiting and "hiking" with an older gentleman described as a friend. Older stories had that he was hunched over picking mushrooms, but testimony indicates otherwise. And yes, he was trespassing, purportedly unknowingly.
Shooter was on his brother's property and admitted to responding officers that he had no bear tag, but thought he was shooting at a bear. In testimony he said "I look and there's something on its hands and knees," which seems to me like an odd way to describe a bear. "It looks like a bear. I adjust to the target, then shoot it. I'm still certain it's a bear." As he approached from 100 yards away he realized it was a person.
Whatever the circumstances, he misidentified a target and killed a person while shooting at what he thought was an animal he was not licensed to hunt. How this equates to multiple acquittals and no convictions of either criminal or hunting violations is beyond me. Probably came down to the lawyering; a bad prosecutor, a good defense, or both.
In any case, I hope I'm never in the woods anywhere near where Mr. Collier is hunting.
he didn't shoot a bear
I don't know buffie, we have some strict game laws in Oregon. I asked a trooper once about the "robo-buck" they use for catching poachers and road hunters, I asked how they can issue a ticket for "shooting a deer from a vehicle" when their "violator" only shot a deer hide wrapped over foam. My cousin can verify that the ticket will hold up in court.
Here, you get ticketed for shooting from a road, or hunting after legal hours, no actual "animal" related charges. A couple guys here stole a robo buck a few years back, got away with it, and cut it up with a sawzall, dumped it next to the highway. DNR was set up on the hardball road, but the fellas passed it up, came down an old logging cut, grabbed it and took off. I told you, poaching and disrespect for DNR go back over 150 years around here.
Still makes me laugh.
I strongly disagree. Try telling a game warden you're hunting and shooting at CROWS "out of season" and see what happens. You will get tried and convicted for attempting to take crows out of season. No evidence required.Bufflehead wrote:you can tell them you are hunting eagles and there's not any thing they can do until you shoot one.banknote wrote:Dead guy was a 20 year old Marine reservist from CA. He was visiting and "hiking" with an older gentleman described as a friend. Older stories had that he was hunched over picking mushrooms, but testimony indicates otherwise. And yes, he was trespassing, purportedly unknowingly.
Shooter was on his brother's property and admitted to responding officers that he had no bear tag, but thought he was shooting at a bear. In testimony he said "I look and there's something on its hands and knees," which seems to me like an odd way to describe a bear. "It looks like a bear. I adjust to the target, then shoot it. I'm still certain it's a bear." As he approached from 100 yards away he realized it was a person.
Whatever the circumstances, he misidentified a target and killed a person while shooting at what he thought was an animal he was not licensed to hunt. How this equates to multiple acquittals and no convictions of either criminal or hunting violations is beyond me. Probably came down to the lawyering; a bad prosecutor, a good defense, or both.
In any case, I hope I'm never in the woods anywhere near where Mr. Collier is hunting.
he didn't shoot a bear
3legged_lab wrote:Bufflehead wrote:you can tell them you are hunting eagles and there's not any thing they can do until you shoot one.banknote wrote:Dead guy was a 20 year old Marine reservist from CA. He was visiting and "hiking" with an older gentleman described as a friend. Older stories had that he was hunched over picking mushrooms, but testimony indicates otherwise. And yes, he was trespassing, purportedly unknowingly.
Shooter was on his brother's property and admitted to responding officers that he had no bear tag, but thought he was shooting at a bear. In testimony he said "I look and there's something on its hands and knees," which seems to me like an odd way to describe a bear. "It looks like a bear. I adjust to the target, then shoot it. I'm still certain it's a bear." As he approached from 100 yards away he realized it was a person.
Whatever the circumstances, he misidentified a target and killed a person while shooting at what he thought was an animal he was not licensed to hunt. How this equates to multiple acquittals and no convictions of either criminal or hunting violations is beyond me. Probably came down to the lawyering; a bad prosecutor, a good defense, or both.
In any case, I hope I'm never in the woods anywhere near where Mr. Collier is hunting.
he didn't shoot a bear
I don't know buffie, we have some strict game laws in Oregon. I asked a trooper once about the "robo-buck" they use for catching poachers and road hunters, I asked how they can issue a ticket for "shooting a deer from a vehicle" when their "violator" only shot a deer hide wrapped over foam. My cousin can verify that the ticket will hold up in court.
NuffDaddy wrote:3legged_lab wrote:Bufflehead wrote:you can tell them you are hunting eagles and there's not any thing they can do until you shoot one.banknote wrote:Dead guy was a 20 year old Marine reservist from CA. He was visiting and "hiking" with an older gentleman described as a friend. Older stories had that he was hunched over picking mushrooms, but testimony indicates otherwise. And yes, he was trespassing, purportedly unknowingly.
Shooter was on his brother's property and admitted to responding officers that he had no bear tag, but thought he was shooting at a bear. In testimony he said "I look and there's something on its hands and knees," which seems to me like an odd way to describe a bear. "It looks like a bear. I adjust to the target, then shoot it. I'm still certain it's a bear." As he approached from 100 yards away he realized it was a person.
Whatever the circumstances, he misidentified a target and killed a person while shooting at what he thought was an animal he was not licensed to hunt. How this equates to multiple acquittals and no convictions of either criminal or hunting violations is beyond me. Probably came down to the lawyering; a bad prosecutor, a good defense, or both.
In any case, I hope I'm never in the woods anywhere near where Mr. Collier is hunting.
he didn't shoot a bear
I don't know buffie, we have some strict game laws in Oregon. I asked a trooper once about the "robo-buck" they use for catching poachers and road hunters, I asked how they can issue a ticket for "shooting a deer from a vehicle" when their "violator" only shot a deer hide wrapped over foam. My cousin can verify that the ticket will hold up in court.
came across one of those robo bucks 2 years ago. They had us set up in about a foot of water on the main channel on a WMA. I think it was a mainframe 14 pt with about a 20"spread. It's head moved and it's eyes glowed. Went back and forth 3 or 4 times taking pictures of the deer and it never moved...just kept turning its head back and forth. Decided to go see what was wrong with it (still thinking it was a real deer) got within about 3 feet with the boat and decided to touch it...finally realized it was a sting the DNR had setup. I bet the guys sitting in the bushes on the bank were falling over laughing.
Sent from my badazz phone using a badazz app
Bulldog0156 wrote:NuffDaddy wrote:3legged_lab wrote:Bufflehead wrote:you can tell them you are hunting eagles and there's not any thing they can do until you shoot one.banknote wrote:Dead guy was a 20 year old Marine reservist from CA. He was visiting and "hiking" with an older gentleman described as a friend. Older stories had that he was hunched over picking mushrooms, but testimony indicates otherwise. And yes, he was trespassing, purportedly unknowingly.
Shooter was on his brother's property and admitted to responding officers that he had no bear tag, but thought he was shooting at a bear. In testimony he said "I look and there's something on its hands and knees," which seems to me like an odd way to describe a bear. "It looks like a bear. I adjust to the target, then shoot it. I'm still certain it's a bear." As he approached from 100 yards away he realized it was a person.
Whatever the circumstances, he misidentified a target and killed a person while shooting at what he thought was an animal he was not licensed to hunt. How this equates to multiple acquittals and no convictions of either criminal or hunting violations is beyond me. Probably came down to the lawyering; a bad prosecutor, a good defense, or both.
In any case, I hope I'm never in the woods anywhere near where Mr. Collier is hunting.
he didn't shoot a bear
I don't know buffie, we have some strict game laws in Oregon. I asked a trooper once about the "robo-buck" they use for catching poachers and road hunters, I asked how they can issue a ticket for "shooting a deer from a vehicle" when their "violator" only shot a deer hide wrapped over foam. My cousin can verify that the ticket will hold up in court.
came across one of those robo bucks 2 years ago. They had us set up in about a foot of water on the main channel on a WMA. I think it was a mainframe 14 pt with about a 20"spread. It's head moved and it's eyes glowed. Went back and forth 3 or 4 times taking pictures of the deer and it never moved...just kept turning its head back and forth. Decided to go see what was wrong with it (still thinking it was a real deer) got within about 3 feet with the boat and decided to touch it...finally realized it was a sting the DNR had setup. I bet the guys sitting in the bushes on the bank were falling over laughing.
Sent from my badazz phone using a badazz app
Lol, I hope they have it on video.
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 135 guests