aunt betty wrote:You aren't betting? You dont understand.
I have all the time in the world to bust your balls on this 50/50 bullshit. Just seeing how much time you will waste argueing.
You gunna bet or not? You never have said and you are evading the question so I repeat...bet or not?
I think he said no but my reading comprehension is poor like someone pointed out this am.
AT, Yes or no. Choose.
assateague wrote:Nope. Don't want to bet.
assateague wrote:And now that I've satisfied your "deflecting" issue, here you go:"The earth is going to complete a revolution around the sun in 364 days, 23 hours, and 59 minutes, and 59 seconds from now".
What are the only two possible outcomes involved in that statement?
Mornin Beef wrote:assateague wrote:And now that I've satisfied your "deflecting" issue, here you go:"The earth is going to complete a revolution around the sun in 364 days, 23 hours, and 59 minutes, and 59 seconds from now".
What are the only two possible outcomes involved in that statement?
The only two outcomes were decided when RNA split a billion years ago and we get to rehash it cuz AT had a fossil fart. Just becasue Michelle Obama has a monkey mouth doesn't give AT the free will to kill math.
sws002 wrote:Mornin Beef wrote:assateague wrote:And now that I've satisfied your "deflecting" issue, here you go:"The earth is going to complete a revolution around the sun in 364 days, 23 hours, and 59 minutes, and 59 seconds from now".
What are the only two possible outcomes involved in that statement?
The only two outcomes were decided when RNA split a billion years ago and we get to rehash it cuz AT had a fossil fart. Just becasue Michelle Obama has a monkey mouth doesn't give AT the free will to kill math.
The fuck?
Totally sigworthy!!!!!!!!jarbo03 wrote:sws002 wrote:Mornin Beef wrote:assateague wrote:And now that I've satisfied your "deflecting" issue, here you go:"The earth is going to complete a revolution around the sun in 364 days, 23 hours, and 59 minutes, and 59 seconds from now".
What are the only two possible outcomes involved in that statement?
The only two outcomes were decided when RNA split a billion years ago and we get to rehash it cuz AT had a fossil fart. Just becasue Michelle Obama has a monkey mouth doesn't give AT the free will to kill math.
The fuck?
I don't know, but it was funny. Nice MB!
Mornin Beef wrote:assateague wrote:And now that I've satisfied your "deflecting" issue, here you go:"The earth is going to complete a revolution around the sun in 364 days, 23 hours, and 59 minutes, and 59 seconds from now".
What are the only two possible outcomes involved in that statement?
The only two outcomes were decided when RNA split a billion years ago and we get to rehash it cuz AT had a fossil fart. Just becasue Michelle Obama has a monkey mouth doesn't give AT the free will to kill math.
Olly wrote: We're still the bastard pirates of the duck forum world.
The Duck Hammer wrote:General Science 90
Math Knowledge 100
Word Knowledge 70 (Basically all guesses, they made those words up)
Assembling Objects 90 (Didn't miss any so I don't understand this)
So 350/400
assateague wrote:Because truthfully, any math-oriented probability is based only on variables which are known. And we all admit that there is no possible way to know an infinite amount of variables. So what is the true value of "there's a 20% chance I'll roll a 6", when it only takes into account variables which we are aware of? Nothing, that's what. It's a useless, worthless phrase, as is all probability. UNTIL there's an outcome. At that point, all of the infinite amount of variables have been distilled down to one result- either it did, or it did not. And that's all anyone cares about. The 50/50™ may very well be the essence of the universe.
sws002 wrote:assateague wrote:Because truthfully, any math-oriented probability is based only on variables which are known. And we all admit that there is no possible way to know an infinite amount of variables. So what is the true value of "there's a 20% chance I'll roll a 6", when it only takes into account variables which we are aware of? Nothing, that's what. It's a useless, worthless phrase, as is all probability. UNTIL there's an outcome. At that point, all of the infinite amount of variables have been distilled down to one result- either it did, or it did not. And that's all anyone cares about. The 50/50™ may very well be the essence of the universe.
I shoulda had you on speed dial when I was in my Math Statistics class, fuck that noise. At one point, I actually proved, with known Mathematics Theorems, that you are more likely to win the lottery by using the random pick option than you are by selecting the same numbers week in, week out. Figure that shit out. It's easy, the answer is 50/50 motherfuckers, get on board.
rebelp74 wrote:Yeah I have a yacht, suck it bitches!
Feelin' Fowl wrote:sws002 wrote:assateague wrote:Because truthfully, any math-oriented probability is based only on variables which are known. And we all admit that there is no possible way to know an infinite amount of variables. So what is the true value of "there's a 20% chance I'll roll a 6", when it only takes into account variables which we are aware of? Nothing, that's what. It's a useless, worthless phrase, as is all probability. UNTIL there's an outcome. At that point, all of the infinite amount of variables have been distilled down to one result- either it did, or it did not. And that's all anyone cares about. The 50/50™ may very well be the essence of the universe.
I shoulda had you on speed dial when I was in my Math Statistics class, fuck that noise. At one point, I actually proved, with known Mathematics Theorems, that you are more likely to win the lottery by using the random pick option than you are by selecting the same numbers week in, week out. Figure that shit out. It's easy, the answer is 50/50 motherfuckers, get on board.
How the hell did you prove that? I would think that the chances would be the same each week with random picks, or the same numbers...and the probability is still 50/50 of course.
assateague wrote:Speaking of which, I need to see if I'm a quadruple hundred millionaire. I bought one ticket.
jarbo03 wrote:The Duck Hammer wrote:General Science 90
Math Knowledge 100
Word Knowledge 70 (Basically all guesses, they made those words up)
Assembling Objects 90 (Didn't miss any so I don't understand this)
So 350/400
Fuckin test told me the rotor is what sends power to the spark plugs on a engine, dod not accept my answer of coil.
Olly wrote: We're still the bastard pirates of the duck forum world.
jarbo03 wrote:assateague wrote:Speaking of which, I need to see if I'm a quadruple hundred millionaire. I bought one ticket.
Don't forget who your friend is!
DeadEye_Dan wrote:Feeding babies in the middle of the night still sucks as much as it did 10 years ago.
Just an update.
rebelp74 wrote:Yeah I have a yacht, suck it bitches!
assateague wrote:Mornin Beef wrote:assateague wrote:And now that I've satisfied your "deflecting" issue, here you go:"The earth is going to complete a revolution around the sun in 364 days, 23 hours, and 59 minutes, and 59 seconds from now".
What are the only two possible outcomes involved in that statement?
The only two outcomes were decided when RNA split a billion years ago and we get to rehash it cuz AT had a fossil fart. Just becasue Michelle Obama has a monkey mouth doesn't give AT the free will to kill math.
I'm not killing math, so much as pointing out the fatal flaw of a human invention. Math in general doesn't exist on its own, it was a people-oriented concoction, and probability specifically was invented to make people feel better about their chances in what is inherently an arbitrary, 50/50 universe. The 50/50™ is as much belief system as it is a rejection of the silly notions of manmade probability. Who gives a rat's ass what the chances of something are? When the rubber meets the road, the only thing that matters, and that anyone actually gives a shit about, is the result. And when a result occurs, there are only two possible outcomes, ever- did or did not.
Embrace it, MB. It fits your lifestyle perfectly.
assateague wrote:Speaking of which, I need to see if I'm a quadruple hundred millionaire. I bought one ticket.
jarbo03 wrote:The Duck Hammer wrote:General Science 90
Math Knowledge 100
Word Knowledge 70 (Basically all guesses, they made those words up)
Assembling Objects 90 (Didn't miss any so I don't understand this)
So 350/400
**** test told me the rotor is what sends power to the spark plugs on a engine, dod not accept my answer of coil.
Mornin Beef wrote:Math exists just like mars. its not a human invention. You've done gone drank all your own 50/50 koolaid this time and there's no more left.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 85 guests