by sws002 » Thu Feb 20, 2014 8:13 pm
aunt betty wrote:Bootlipkiller wrote:Juice Box wrote:huntall6 wrote:Juice Box wrote:huntall6 wrote:assateague wrote:vincentpa wrote:Being serious, I doubt a poly frame would hold up to the long term usage you would require as a weapon. It will break. It's just a matter of when. There are too many re entrant corners. Polymers are weak at corners especially as a result of fatigue, which is what frames experience. Go for a metal frame.
You better give Mr. Glock a call, then.
Or Springfield or ruger or smith and Wesson pr sig or cz or fn or Taurus........ok maybe skip that last one. They haven't figured it out yet......@
I've never had a single problem with my Taurus!! Good shooting little gun too.
My next purchase is the same gun as yours, the TCP. I have no bias. Just thought I would make a joke.......
I wish they made one just a smudge bigger that's chambered in the 9mm. I'm very disappointed in the knock down power if the 380.
It's a 380, what did you expect?
9mm=0.3543"
How is .380" < 9mm ?
I don't get it.
38 Special vs. 9mm
Which one hurts more when you get shot? 9mm or .380?
Which round makes a bigger hole?
They are the same diameter bullet (.355), one is just 2mm shorter than the other (.380 is 9x17, 9mm is 9x19).
Funny you should mention the difference between .38 Spcl and .357, as those two cartridges are only separated by 1mm overall length and I'm sure you are aware of the performance difference between those two.
To achieve success, one must possess dedication, passion and a boatload of decoys.
#LagunaMadre2k14