soak it in salt water overnight, soak it in Worcester overnight, fry in pan to medium just like duck. Tastes pretty goodNuffDaddy wrote:Goldfish wrote:Anyone who says coot doesn't taste good, either hasn't had it, or says all duck doesn't taste good. I'll not be passing up those little buggers if they happen by when there are no other birds working anymore.
I've never had it. Everyone just always said they taste like shit. Guess I'll have to try and shoot one next year.
AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
Flightstopper wrote:Worcester overnight?? Seems like a bit overkill.
AKPirate wrote:The sins of Boot and Gaddy are causing the Cali drought and knowing they have no limits to their depravity... :mrgreen:
Bootlipkiller wrote:Flightstopper wrote:Worcester overnight?? Seems like a bit overkill.
Got to kill the coot taste
Goldfish wrote:soak it in salt water overnight, soak it in Worcester overnight, fry in pan to medium just like duck. Tastes pretty goodNuffDaddy wrote:Goldfish wrote:Anyone who says coot doesn't taste good, either hasn't had it, or says all duck doesn't taste good. I'll not be passing up those little buggers if they happen by when there are no other birds working anymore.
I've never had it. Everyone just always said they taste like shit. Guess I'll have to try and shoot one next year.
assateague wrote:Put that in your huff-n-puffer and smoke it, shootin' boy.
Bootlipkiller wrote:Flightstopper wrote:Worcester overnight?? Seems like a bit overkill.
Got to kill the coot taste
AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
Rick wrote:I usually just saute the fillets in butter with a dash of Lawry's seasoning until they're medium rare or the juice just turns clear for those who want "well done". Have also enjoyed them in jambalaya, gumbo and on the grill.
DNB, anyone who can screw up coot should avoid ducks, too.
assateague wrote:Put that in your huff-n-puffer and smoke it, shootin' boy.
ducks~n~bucks wrote:Rick wrote:I usually just saute the fillets in butter with a dash of Lawry's seasoning until they're medium rare or the juice just turns clear for those who want "well done". Have also enjoyed them in jambalaya, gumbo and on the grill.
DNB, anyone who can screw up coot should avoid ducks, too.
I actually think coot tastes good. It was just a joke my dad uses.
AKPirate wrote:The sins of Boot and Gaddy are causing the Cali drought and knowing they have no limits to their depravity... :mrgreen:
Bootlipkiller wrote:Flightstopper wrote:Worcester overnight?? Seems like a bit overkill.
Got to kill the coot taste
Goldfish wrote:Bootlipkiller wrote:Flightstopper wrote:Worcester overnight?? Seems like a bit overkill.
Got to kill the coot taste
Asses, lol. That's how I do all my duck. But usually after I soak it in salt water they go in the freezer and I just thaw them in Worcester
AKPirate wrote:Jason is usually right but sometimes wrong
Goldfish wrote:Anyone who says coot doesn't taste good, either hasn't had it, or says all duck doesn't taste good. I'll not be passing up those little buggers if they happen by when there are no other birds working anymore.
clampdaddy wrote:If a bird sneaks in and lands within range I figure that he beat me fair and square so I won't blast it unless it tries to fly away. If he swims away I'm S.O.L., but if a bird's lands out a ways and I can convince it to swim into range, I'll jump. If he flys, great, if he doesn't, whatever.
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
assateague wrote:I wouldn't be able to shoot anything. I'd be paralyzed with fear that I was going to piss myself off by breaking my own rules, as the birds fly away.
Here's my rule- if it's within range, shoot it. I don't care if it flew, swam, took a bus, whatever.
assateague wrote:I wouldn't be able to shoot anything. I'd be paralyzed with fear that I was going to piss myself off by breaking my own rules, as the birds fly away.
Here's my rule- if it's within range, shoot at it. I don't care if it flew, swam, took a bus, whatever.
Maybe. Not really a set of rules though. Just one. I won't swat a bird that managed to land in my spread because I wasn't paying attention.3legged_lab wrote: Strange set of rules you've made for yourself
DeadEye_Dan wrote:assateague wrote:I wouldn't be able to shoot anything. I'd be paralyzed with fear that I was going to piss myself off by breaking my own rules, as the birds fly away.
Here's my rule- if it's within range, shoot at it. I don't care if it flew, swam, took a bus, whatever.
FIFY
DeadEye_Dan wrote:assateague wrote:I wouldn't be able to shoot anything. I'd be paralyzed with fear that I was going to piss myself off by breaking my own rules, as the birds fly away.
Here's my rule- if it's within range, shoot at it. I don't care if it flew, swam, took a bus, whatever.
FIFY
3200 Man wrote:I can see you wouldn't be worth a damn hunting Sask , as 500 or so Mallards and Sprig come into the decoys at
10 yds ? With that kind of mind-set , you would be done in seconds........with nothing to do but watch ?
3200 Man wrote:I can see you wouldn't be worth a damn hunting Sask , as 500 or so Mallards and Sprig come into the decoys at
10 yds ? With that kind of mind-set , you would be done in seconds........with nothing to do but watch ?
Bootlipkiller wrote: all the mallards I killed today had boners do to my epic calling.
Eric Haynes wrote:3200 Man wrote:I can see you wouldn't be worth a damn hunting Sask , as 500 or so Mallards and Sprig come into the decoys at
10 yds ? With that kind of mind-set , you would be done in seconds........with nothing to do but watch ?
No one is forcing you to stop shooting.
one2many wrote:i have found the odds of me shooting a duck greatly swing to my favor the closer they are, swimming to me.
i aint proud
Return to Puddle Duck Hunting Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests