clampdaddy wrote:Goldfish wrote:To be honest, I can't watch Les Stroud's thing. I tried and turned it off. I can write off the hokey shows as dumb entertainment, but when he was taking about it, it gave me the Willies. I'm already trying to watch my back enough waking thru the dark with only my bow worrying about critters. Adding in freaky beasts gets me too much on edge.

I know what you mean. A few years back I had an intense spitting distance run in with a really big, really pissed off black bear. All I had was my bow in hand, The whole time I was just thinking about how I was about to get in a fight with a bear while a perfectly good .454 was laying under my pillow, 400 yards away back at camp and how I wished this same scenario upon the dick hole who came up with the law that we can't pack heat while bow hunting in Ca. I haven't gone into the woods with a bow or without a heavy revolver, since.
I honestly don't get what you guys are afraid of. I've been hunting in the woods since I was 7 years old. I've been bow hunting probably 35 years or close to that. I have never carried a side arm, ever. My parents never taught me about the boogieman and I never taught my kids that either. For the most part, animals with very few exceptions are more afraid of you than you are of them. Now, if I was on Kodiak Island, I would use common sense and arm myself.
I don't know how California was able to swing it but, Oregon lost the battle of telling archers and bow hunters they couldn't have a side arm. It's a U.S. Constitutional right to bare arms, even when hunting with a bow. Like I said, Oregon lost that battle in court years ago.
With that said though, you will be charged by law enforcement if you use that firearm to dispatch a wounded animal while bow hunting in Oregon.